Chennai Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Murali Vs. R.Shyamala
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED1912.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN C.M.A. NO.3652 OF2010R.Murali .. Appellant Versus 1.R.Shyamala KRB Transport, No.1, Rettaimalai Srinivasan Street, Puzhal, Chennai 600 066. 2.United India Insurance Co. Ltd., No.44, Whites Road, Sudarsan Buildings II Floor, Chennai 600 014. .. Respondents PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the judgment and decree in W.C.No.280 of 2009 dated 11.05.2010 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II, (Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation II), Chennai 600 006. For Appellant : Mr.U.M.Ravichandiran For Respondent-1 : No Appearance For Respondent-2 : Mr.C.Paranthaman * * * * * JUDGMENT Against the order passed in W.C.No.280 of 2009 by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II (Commissioner for Workmens Compensation-II), Chennai-600006, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed.2. A claim of Rs.6,00,000/- under the...
Owners and Persons Interested in the Vessel Mt Titan Vision Vs. 3f Ind ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH A.Nos.5357, 5358 and 5690 of 2013 in C.S.No.740 of 2013 A.Nos.5357 and 5358 of 2013: Owners and persons interested in the vessel MT Titan Vision, now lying at The Port of Krishnapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, represented by its master. ... Applicant. vs. 3F Industries Ltd., 36, CP Ramaswamy Road, Alwarpet, Chennai 600 018 rep. By its Vice President and Company Secretary S.Rangarajan ... Respondent A.No.5690 of 2013: PROFESSIONAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PVT. LTD., rep. By its Director, Mr.Anil Kumar, 116, Skylark Building, Polot No.63, Sector 11, CBD, Belapur, Navi, Mumbai. ... Applicant vs. 3F Industries Ltd., 36, CP Ramaswamy Road, Alwarpet, Chennai 600 018 rep. By its Vice President and Company Secretary S.Rangarajan ... 1st respondent Owners and persons interested in the vessel MT Titan Vision, now lying at The Port of Krishnapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, represented by its master. ... 2nd respondent....
Anusuya Vs. Dhanalakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 12.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN C.R.P.NPD No.88 of 2011 1. Mrs.Anusuya 2. Mrs.Tamil Selvi [ Appellants ]. Vs 1. Smt.Dhanalakshmi @ Lakshmi 2. Alamelu 3. Sumathi No.10/2, Teeds Garden 2nd Street Perambur, Chennai 600 011 4. Corporation of Chennai rep by its Commissioner Rippon Buildings, Park Town Chennai 600 003 [ RESPONDENTS ]. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order passed in C.A.No.23 of 2004 dated 2.7.2009 on the file of the Administrator General of Tamil Nadu, Chennai. For Appellants : Mr.M.L.Ramesh For respondents : M/s.Indirani for R1 to R3 Mr.V.Bharathidasan for R4 ORDER This Civil Revision Petition was referred for mediation to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, by the order of this Court, dated 22.2.2013.2. A communication, dated 5.11.2013, of the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, enclosing a copy of its Mediatio...
V.Saraswathy Vs. Corporation of Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 12.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN C.R.P.NPD No.89 of 2011 1. V.Saraswathy 2. Anusuya 3. Mrs.Tamil Selvi [ Appellants ]. Vs 1. Corporation of Chennai rep by its Commissioner Rippon Buildings, Park Town Chennai 600 003 2. Smt.Dhanalakshmi 3. Alamelu 4. Sumathi No.10/2, Teeds Garden 2nd Street Perambur, Chennai 600 011 [ RESPONDENTS ]. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order passed in C.A.No.18 of 2004 dated 2.7.2009 on the file of the Administrator General of Tamil Nadu, Chennai. For Appellants : Mr.M.L.Ramesh For respondents : Mr.V.Bharathidasan for R1 M/s.Indirani for R2 to R4 ORDER This Civil Revision Petition was referred for mediation to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, by the order of this Court, dated 22.2.2013.2. A communication, dated 5.11.2013, of the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, enclosing a copy of its Mediat...
Ravichandran Vs. Paramasivam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P.(NPD). No.2430 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 1. Ravichandran 2. Selvakumar 3. Tamilarasi 4. Alamelu 5. Shanthi ... Petitioners vs Paramasivam ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 27.02.2012 made in I.A.No.51 of 2011 in A.S.No.173 of 2008 by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Ariyalur. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Thiagarajan For Respondent : Mr.P.Murugan for Mr.S.Kamadevan ORDER This Revision is preferred against the order of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Ariyalur, dated 27.02.2012 made in I.A.No.51 of 2011 in A.S.No.173 of 2008 on the file of the above said Appellate Judge.2. One Elanchezhiyan filed the Suit O.S.No.11 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif, Ariyalur, against the respondent herein for declaration that the suit property belonged to him and ...
K.Rajendran Vs. Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 12.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN W.P.No.34656 of 2013 K.RAJENDRAN ADVOCATE2203 SOUTH STREET, MAYILADUTHURAI609003 NAGAI DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER Vs. 1 THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF TAMILNADU, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI9 2 THE SECRETARY GOVT. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, GOVT. OF TAMIL NADU, FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI9 3 THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, HIGHWAYS (KOTTAPORIYALAR (NE), NABARD AND RURAL ROADS SECTION, NAGAPATTINAM. 4 THE DIVISIONAL ENGIEER HIGHWAYS DEPT. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS SECTION TANJORE. 5 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR NAGAPATTIANAM DISTRICT, NAGAPATTINAM. ... RESPONDENTS Writ Petition filed under under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to immediately lay Mayiladuthurai Bye-Pass road Phase I and Mayiladuthurai to Vaitheeswaran koil Bye Pass Road Phase II. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vaithiyalingam For Respondent : Mr.V.Jayaprakashnarayanan Spl.Govt. Pleader ORDER By conse...
G.Lakshmanan Vs. State Rep by Insp.of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 12.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Crl.O.P.No.10159 of 2013 G.Lakshmanan .. Petitioner vs.1. State rep by Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Perambalur 2. P.Sumathi .. Respondents This criminal original petition has been filed to quash the FIR in crime No.23 of 2011 on the file of DCB, Perambalur, against the petitioner. For petitioner : Mr.D.Sreenivasan For respondent : Mr.K.Gandhikumar ORDER This criminal original petition was referred for mediation to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, by the order of this Court, dated 19.4.2013.2. A communication, dated 3.10.2013, of the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, enclosing a copy of its Mediation Report, dated 6.9.2013, has been received, and in the said Mediation Report, it is stated as follows:- ".Both the parties appeared before the Centre alone with their Counsel. Matter has been settled ...
G.Lakshmanan Vs. P.Sumathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 12.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Crl.O.P.No.9055 of 2013 G.Lakshmanan .. Petitioner vs. P.Sumathi .. Respondent This criminal original petition has been filed to quash the complaint in STC No.648 of 2012 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ariyalur, against the petitioner. For petitioner : Mr.D.Sreenivasan For respondents : Mr.K.Gandhikumar ORDER This original petition has been filed seeking to quash the complaint in STC No.648 of 2012, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ariyalur, against the petitioner.2. This criminal original petition was referred for mediation to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, by the order of this Court, dated 12.4.2013.3. A communication, dated 3.10.2013, of the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, enclosing a copy of its Mediation Report, dated 6.9.2013, has been received, and in the said Mediation ...
S.Bhaskaran Vs. R.Loganathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 12.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS O.S.A.No.392 of 2013 And M.P.No.1 of 2013 1. S.Bhaskaran 2. Shweta Narayan ... Appellants Vs. R.Loganathan (deceased) 1. Mrs. Savithri 2. L.Kannamurthy 3. P.Hemavathy 4. T.saraswathy ... Respondents PRAYER: Appeal against the Order dated 22.11.13 made in A.No.4809 of 2013 in T.O.S.No.23 of 2008 on the file of the High Court, Madras. *** For Appellants : Mr.S.Parthasarathy Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Rajasekar JUDGMENT P.DEVADASS, J., As this appeal lies on a narrow campus, we have decided to dispose of it at the admission stage itself.2. This Original Side Appeal arises out of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Application No.4809 of 2013 filed by the plaintiffs in T.O.S.No.23 of 2008, whereunder P.W.3 Rajakumari has been recalled to enable the plaintiffs to cross examine her.3. One Loganathan is the father of respondents (plaintif...
K.Arasu Vs. K.N.Murali
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date:- 18.12.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice P.R.SHIVAKUMAR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.47 of 2011 K.Arasu ... Petitioner ..vs..1. Mr.K.N.Murali The Assistant Commissioner of Police Law & Order Thuraippakkam Chennai 41.2. Mr.G.K.Venkatkumar Inspector of Police Neelangarai Police Station Chennai 41. ... Respondents Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for having committed contempt of Court by violating and disobeying the order dated 05.08.2009 made in Crl.O.P.No.12854 of 2009. For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Saravanan for M/s.A.Kumara Guru For Respondents : Mr.N.Anand Venkatesh ORDER The Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for non-compliance with the order of this Court dated 05.08.2009 made in Crl.O.P.No.12854 of 2009.2. The first and second respondents are present in person. They are represented by counsel. They have also filed separate affidavits stating that the order of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »