Chennai Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kandasamy Vs. Syed Hashim
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN C.R.P.(PD).Nos.4167 of 2011 and 266 of 2012 & M.P.Nos.1 of 2011 and 1 of 2012 1. Kandasamy 2. Latha .. Petitioners in both the CRP vs. Syed Hashim .. Respondent in both the CRP Prayer in C.R.P (PD).No.4167 of 2011 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.502 of 2011 pending on the file of the I Additional District Court, Coimbatore. Prayer in C.R.P (PD).No.266 of 2012 : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order, dated 21.11.2011 made in I.A.No.810 of 2011 in I.A.No.679 of 2011 in O.S.No.502 of 2011 on the file of the I Additional District Court, Coimbatore. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Krishnamoorthy, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Sithirai Anandan For Respondent : Mr.K.N.Nataraj for Mr.M.Parthasarathy COMMON ORDER C.R.P (PD) No.4167 of 2011 has been preferred under...
J.Sivakumar Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-19-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.16711 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 J.Sivakumar ..Petitioner versus 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director of Rural Development, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai-600 005. 3.The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 4.The Block Development Officer, Sethupava Chathiram, Thanjavur District. 5.The Accountant General, No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 015..Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 5th respondent in Pen 2/ VI/10208541/Rev/2012-13/ADK dated 05.10.2012, quash the same and consequently direct the 5th respondent to count 50% of service of the petitioner as Part-Time Panchayat C...
Chennai City Auto Ottunargal Sangam Vs. Chief Secretary to the State G ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 11.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.Nos.27310, 27311 and 27700 of 2013 and connected M.Ps. CHENNAI CITY AUTO OTTUNARGAL SANGAM REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY MR.J.MANOHAR NO.33, HANUMANTHARAYAN KOIL STREET OTTERI , CHENNAI-12. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.27310/2013 VADA CHENNAI MAVATTA AUTO OTTUNARGAL PADUGAPPU SANGAM REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY M.ANANDAN NO.29, II STREET, ANANDA NAYAKI NAGAR C.B.ROAD, KORRUKKUPET CHENNAI-21. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.27311/2013 MADRAS METRO AUTO DRIVERS ASSN. (AFFILIATED TO AITUC) REP BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY MR.J.SESHASAYANAM NO.48, PRAKASAM SALAI (JEEVA HALL) BROADWAY, CHENNAI 108. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.27700/2013 -Vs.- 1 THE CHIEF SECRETARY STATE GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI-9 2 THE SECRETARY HOME (TRANSPORT III) DEPARTMENT STATE GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-9. 3 THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-5. ..Respondents in all W.Ps. P...
K.Madhavan Naidu Vs. Rajini Balakrishnan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :18. 11/2013 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH A.No.4029 of 2013 in C.S.No.474 of 2013 K.MADHAVAN NAIDU S/O. M.K.RAJAGOPAL NAIDU MRS. K.SHAKILA K.RITHISH ALL ARE RESIDING AT PLOT NO.16/A-2 AKSHAYA COLONY, FIRST AVENUE, MOGAPPAIR CHENNAI50MRS. K.RADHADEVI K.RAMESH MS. K.RAMYA .. PETITIONERS VS. MRS. RAJINI BALAKRISHNAN NO.83, MAYOR RAMANATHAN ROAD, CHETPET, CHENNAI31MRS. V.REVATHI NALLUR KAMARAPALAYAM VILLAGE, PONNERI TALUK, THIRUVALLUR DT MRS. RAMA GUNASEKARAN NO.HIG102 NEW ASTC HUDCO HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRI DT .... RESPONDENTS For petitioner : Mr.R.THIAGARAJAN For 1st respondent : Mr.T.V.KRISHNAMACHARI ORDER: R.SUBBIAH, J The present application has been filed to pass an order revoking the leave granted in Application No.2901 of 2013 in C.S.Diary No.193113 of 2013 dated 10.7.2013 and dismiss the suit.2. For the sake of convenience, the applicants are referred to as the defendants and the respondents are referred to as the plaintiffs.3. The ...
S.Arulappan Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :18. 11.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition Nos.4505 of 2012, 4506, 21188, 26744 of 2012, 1395 to 1398 of 2013, 4352, 4354, 4355, 5078, 5328, 5335, 5336, 5426, 5497, 5920, 5925, 6809, 7483, 8476, 8668, 8669, 9001, 9026, 9188, 9390, 9605, 9917, 9995, 10212, 10648, 10792, 11015, 11017, 11108, 11215, 11558, 11575, 11578, 11589, 11990, 12429, 12434, 12436, 12464, 12492, 12507, 12508, 13394, 14243, 15067 to 15069, 15433, 15557, 15765, 15778, 15782, 16019, 16131, 16135, 16142 to 16145, 16156, 16232, 16261, 16327, 16343, 16348 & 16349, 16449, 16846, 17313, 17318, 17369, 17514, 17591, 17610, 17612, 17885, 18180, 18184, 18222, 18373, 18484, 18836, 19025 to 19030, 19287, 19300, 19967, 20005, 20157, 20304, 20468, 20655, 20656, 20698, 21000 to 21005, 21247, 21339, 21957, 21958, 21960, 21964, 22236, 22238, 22616, 22626, 23397, 23421, 23490, 23796, 23797, 23805, 24111, 24112, 24122, 24345 and 24382 of 2013 and con...
Sivaji Rao Vs. 1.Eswari Bai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Appeal Suit No.1078 of 1995 and CMP No.14626 of 1995 Sivaji Rao ... Appellant/Plaintiff Vs. 1.Eswari Bai 2.Sumathy Bai 3.Suguna 4.Suresh 5.Ramesh 6.Kumar 7.Manjula 8.Lakshmi 9.C.Rajendran 10.C.Swaminathan (alias) C.Shanmugam 11.Lakshmi 12.Maheswari 13.Parameswari 14.Vasanthi 15.Sarojini ...Respondents/Defendants Prayer.. Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.121 of 1990 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam, dated 28.04.1995. !For Appellant .. Mr.S.Natesh Raja ^For R1 to R11 .. Mr.R.Rajaraman R12 to R15 .. Given up :JUDGMENT The Appellant/Plaintiff filed this Appeal Suit as against the decree and judgment made in O.S.No.121 of 1990 on the file of Sub Court, Kumbakonam, dated 28.04.1995. 2.The Appellant/Plaintiff filed a suit seeking the following reliefs: a. for declaration of title in respect of 'A' schedule prope...
G.Sritharan Vs. Commercial Tax Officer Rural
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 11.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN CRP.NPD.No.330 of 2010 G.Sritharan .... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commercial Tax Officer (Rural) Cuddalore 1 Having Office at Commercial Tax Office Sub Jail Road, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore -1. 2.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by Collector, Cuddalore District, Having Office at Collectorate, Cuddalore 1. .... Respondents Prayer : This civil revision petition is filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., against the fair and decretal order dated 13.11.2009 and made in I.A.No.637 of 2009 in O.S.No.524 of 2006 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Cuddalore. For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan For Respondent : Mr.T.Jayaramaraj (GA) ORDER1 Challenge has been made in this memorandum of civil revision to the fair and decretal order dated 13.11.2009 and made in I.A.No.637 of 2009 in O.S.No.527 of 2006, on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Cuddalore. The matrix of the case....
A.Sunil Kothari Vs. Chairman of Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.No.27845 of 2013 A.Sunil Kothari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. 2.The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Superintending Engineer, Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle/West, Thirumangalam, Chennai 600 040. 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, O & M, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Thiruverkadu, Chennai. 4.The Assistant Engineer, O & M, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Puliyampattu, Chennai. 5.The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Rep. by its Member Secretary, No.1,Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to provide elect...
Perumal Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.11.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.R.C.Nos.831 and 864 of 2007 Perumal .Petitioner in Crl.RC.No.831/2007 S.V.Krishnamurthy .Petitioner in Crl.RC.No.864/2007 versus The State rep. by its Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Chengalpet Range, Chennai and Criminal Investigation Department, Crime Branch, Villupuram.Respondent in Crl.RC.No.831/2007 The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Villupuram.Respondent in Crl.RC.No.864/2007 Criminal Revisions are filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the common judgment dated 9.6.2007 made in Crl.A.Nos.43 and 42/2006 respectively on the file of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Tindivanam confirming the judgment dated 21.8.2006 made in CC.No.52/1998 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vanur. For Petitioners : Mr.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj in Crl.RC.831/2007 Mr.N.R.Elango, SC for M/s.P.V.Rajeswari in Crl.RC.864/2...
M.Kumar Vs. M.Mohankumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18/11/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Application No.1458 of 2013 in Civil Suit No.873 of 2010 MR.M.KUMAR4355, MC.NICHOLES ROAD, CHETPUT, CHENNAI-31. versus M.MOHANKUMAR NO.5, NEW NO.9, SEETHAMMAL COLONY, 3RD CROSS STREET, ALWARPET, CHENNAI-18. 2. M.RAJKUMAR NO.5, NEW NO.9, SEETHAMMAL COLONY, 3RD CROSS STREET, ALWARPET, CHENNAI-18. 3. HEMA RAJAMOHAN NO.528, TTK ROAD, ALWARPET, CHENNAI-18. ORDER Application No.1458 of 2013 in Civil Suit No.873 of 2010 R.SUBBIAH, J., This application has been filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with order VI Rule 17 of C.P.C.to amend the plaint. 2.The applicant herein has originally filed the suit for the following reliefs:- a)for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants etc., in any manner from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property bearing No.43/55, Mc.Nicholes Road, Chetput, Chennai-600 0...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »