Chennai Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Venkatesan Vs. V.Jaganathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 11.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.M.A.No.695 of 2009 R.Venkatesan ... Appellant ..Vs..1. V.Jaganathan 2. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., 45 Moore Street, Chennai 600 001 3. P.S.Krishnan 4. The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., No.38 Anna Salai, Chennai 2 (Respondents 1 to 3 given up in CMA) ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the fair and decreetal order, dated 16.09.2008 in MCOP No.1438 of 2005 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (II Judge, Court of Small Causes), Chennai. For Appellant : Mr. A.N.Viswanatha Rao For Respondents : Mr. V.Kabirdoss - - - JUDGMENT A person injured in an accident leaves his family in greater distress, vis-a-vis a family in a case of death. In the latter case, the initial shock gives way to a feeling of resignation and acceptance, and in time, compels the family to move on. The case of an injured and ...
R.Natarajan Vs. Commissioner and Director of Survey and Settlement
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 11.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.A.NO.2149 OF2012AND M.P.NO.1 OF2012R.Natarajan ... Appellant Vs.1. Commissioner an Director of Survey and Settlement, Chepauk, Chennai-5 2. Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records Kancheepuram Kancheepuram District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 19.7.2012 made in W.P.No.23330 of 2008 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.R.Malaichamy For Respondents: Mr.R.Ravichandran,AGP JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR,J.) This Writ Appeal is filed against the Order dated 19.7.2012 made in W.P.No.23330 of 2008, wherein the appellant challenged the order of the 2nd respondent in proceedings Na.Ka.Aa4/3633/2007 dated 1.9.2008 cancelling the leave of 809 days on medical grounds from 23.6.1997 to 9.9.1999 and the consequential terminatio...
G.Gnanaprathayini Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.19196 of 2013 W.P.(MD)Nos.19197 to 19199 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1, 1, 1 and 1 of 2013 G.Gnanaprathayini ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.19196 of 2013 M.Jeyachithra ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.19197 of 2013 V.Raja Rajeswari ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.19198 of 2013 KR.Vellipusari ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.19199 of 2013 Vs The Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, EVK Sampath Maligai, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai - 06. ... Respondent in all the Writ Petitions Prayer This Writ Petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to award the marks to the petitioners Written in the Paper-II, B-Series and Paper-I, D-Series by the Tamil Nadu Teacher Eligibility Test - 2013 held on 18.08.2013 conducted by the respondent and consequently to direct the respondent to include the petitioners' nam...
Arunagiri Vs. 1.Ayyar Muthuraja
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :27. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI Appeal Suit (MD)No.266 of 2009 and MP(MD)Nos.2 of 2010 & 1 of 2012 Arunagiri .. Appellant/Plaintiff Vs 1.Ayyar Muthuraja 2.Natesan (died) 3.Subramanian 4.Muruganantham 5.N.Lalitha 6.Karuppayee .. Respondents/Defendants 7.Senthilkumar 8.Shanthi 9.Thilakam (RR - 7 to 9 Brought on record as LRs of deceased R2 vide order dated 17.06.2013) .. Respondents Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 19.09.2008 passed in Original Suit No.215 of 2004 by the Additional District & Sessions Court/Fast Track Court No.I, Tiruchirapalli. !For Appellant ... Mr.R.Kannan for Mr.K.K.Senthil ^For R - 1 ... No appearance For RR - 2 to 9 ... Mr.G.R.Swaminathan :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.SELVAM, J.) Challenge in this Appeal Suit is to the Judgment and decree dated 19.09.2008 passed in Original Suit...
Nirmala Devadoss Vs. Rt.Rev.V.Devasagayam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :27. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN Cont.P.No.1580 of 2013 in M.P.No.1 of 2011 in Tr.C.M.P.No.836 of 2011 and Tr.C.M.P.No.836 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Cont.P.No.1580 of 2013 Nirmala Devadoss ... Petitioner versus 1. Rt. Rev.V.Devasagayam Bishop of CSI, Diocese of Chennai, 226, Cathedral Road, Chennai 600 089.2. Mercy David ... Respondents The Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for committing contempt, on the ground that there is willful disobedience of the order, dated 23.12.2011 passed by this Court in M.P.No.1 of 2011 in Tr.C.M.P.No.836 of 2011, on the file of this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Su.Srinivasan For Respondents : Mr.B.Rabu Manohar for R1 Mr.R.Amizhdhan for R2 Tr.C.M.P.No.836 of 2011 Nirmala Devadoss ... Petitioner versus 1. Rt. Rev.V.Devasagayam Bishop of CSI, Diocese of Chennai, 226, Cathedral Road, Chennai 600 0...
Karthik Vs. State Represented by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Criminal Appeal (MD) No.110 of 2012 Karthik S/o.Sathiyamurthy 5/15 Bharathi Nagar, Thennur, Trichy. ... Appellant Vs State Represented by Inspector of Police, Thiruverambur Police Station, Trichy District. Crime No.147/2011 ... Respondent PRAYER This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment passed in S.C.No.119 of 2011 dated 18.04.2012 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Trichy. !For Appellant ... Mr.T.Senthilkumar ^For Respondent ... Mr.K.S.Duraipandian (Additional Public Prosecutor) * * * * * :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.KARUPPIAH, J.) The appellant who is the sole accused in S.C.No.119 of 2011, has filed this criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence imposed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Trichy, dated 18.04.2012.2. Heard Mr.T.Sen...
T.Selvam Vs. R.Venkateswaralu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 11.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.M.A.No.3167 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 T.Selvam ... Appellant ..Vs..1. R.Venkateswaralu 2. National Insurance Co. Ltd., 762, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002 (R-1 remained exparte in MCOP) ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (IV Court of Small Causes), Chennai in MCOP No.4514 of 2004, dated 02.04.2009. For Appellant : Mr. A.Jothi For Respondents : Mr. C.R.Krishnamoorthy, for R-2, Exparte, for R-1. - - - JUDGMENT This Appeal is filed by the claimant, seeking enhancement of compensation. In respect of the claim made for a sum of Rs.2,40,000/-, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.1,04,000/-. Contending that the amount of compensation awarded is inadequate, the claimant has filed this Appeal.2. The claimant has suffered fractures on 5th, 6th and 7th rib...
G.Amsaveni Vs. Mrs.V.Komala
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.11.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.M.A.No.2144 of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006 G.Amsaveni, Proprietor, Sree Harikrishna Brick Works, No.125, Chinthamani Road, Chennai 600 102 ..Appellant ..Vs.MRS.V.Komala Wife of (Late) Varadhan @ Varadharajulu ..Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of The Workmen Compensation Act, to set-aside the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour I, Chennai 6, the authority under the Workmen Compensation Act, dated 26.09.2005, in W.C.No.357 of 2003 (order copy being served on 31.03.2006).For Appellant : Mr.Balan Haridas For Respondent : Mr.S.Haridoss - - - JUDGMENT Murder, whether tantamounts to accident, is the issue raised in this Appeal?. If so, whether the accident (of murder) arose out of and in the couRs.of employment, is yet another issue raised. 2. The applicant (respondent herein) filed W.C.No.351 2003, claiming compensation of Rs.8,00,000/-, in respect of de...
D.Poongothai Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.17585 of 2013 W.P.(MD)No.17802 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1, 1, 2 & 2 of 2013 D.Poongothai ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.17585/2013 P.Mariyammal ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.17802/2013 Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai-09. 2.The Teachers Recruitment Board, rep. by its Chairman, 4th Floor, E.V.K.Sampath Maaligai, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai - 600 006. ... Respondents in both the writ petitions Prayer in W.P.(MD).No.17585 of 2013 This Writ Petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the communication issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings Nil dated Nil and quash the same as illegal and consequentially to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for appointment to t...
Adithyaa Vs. Food Corporation of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :27. .11..2013 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.S.Ramanathan A.S.Nos.167, 206 and 207 of 2002 and CMP.Nos.13770 & 13771 of 2012 A.S.No.167 of 2002 M/s.Adithyaa rep. by Prop. N.Santhanam ...Appellant Vs. Food Corporation of India, Regional Office by Senior Regional Manager, Chennai 600 006. ...Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the common judgment and decree, dated 29.04.2002, passed in O.S.No.8 of 2002, on the file of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Cuddalore. For Appellant : Mr.M.S.Sundarajan For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Thambuswamy A.S.No.206 of 2002 1. Food Corporation of India, rep. by Senior Regional Manager, Madras.2. Food Corporation of India, rep. by the District Manager, Cuddalore. ...Appellants Vs. M/s.Adithyaa rep. by Prop. N.Santhanam, No.24, West Mada Church Street, Royapuram, Madras 13 ...Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »