Chennai Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Subashsunder Vs. Commissioner of Salem City Municipal Corporation
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY W.P.No.2417 of 2007 and M.P.No.2 of 2007 ---- 1. A.Subashsunder 2. P.Ravichandran 3. K.A.Balakrishnan 4. G.Dhanaseelan 5. M.Sureshkumar 6. R.Radha 7. R.Madhu 8. C.Sridharan 9. N.Ramesh 10.S.R.Rajeshkannan 11.T.Rajagopal 12.S.Selvakennadi 13.S.Srinivasan 14.P.Umamaheswari 15.G.Sivakumar ... Petitioners Vs.1. The Commissioner, Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem.2. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.C3/4395/06 dated 31.5.2006 and quash the same and to regularise the petitioners in the post of Technical Assistant in the Salem City Municipal Corporation ...
J.Alex Ponseelan Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE: 07/11/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.8345 of 2011 and W.P.(MD)Nos.13148 and 13149 of 2012, 85, 3287, 5055, 5717, 6717, 6799, 6800, 7211, 7813, 7838, 9398, 9861, 11794 and 16635 of 2013 W.P.(MD)No.8345/2011 J.Alex Ponseelan ..Petitioner vs 1.The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai. 2.The Director, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Annasalai, Chennai. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.540/117953/ appointment 1(2)/2011, dated 19.05.2011, setting aside th same an consequently directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Constable Grade-II in the recruitment of the year 2009-2010. !For Petitioner in .Mr.T...
Arputham Vs. Zonal Officer of Zone Xi of the Corporation of Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :07. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Writ Petition No.29485 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 Arputham ..Petitioner .vs.1. The Zonal Officer, Zone XI Corporation of Chennai Ripon Building Chennai 3 2. The Tahsildar Ambattur Taluk Ambattur Chennai 3. P.Deivendran .. Respondents Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issue of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the including the impugned notice of the first respondent vide No.Zone XI/Na.Ka.No.5936/04/2013 dated 7.9.2013 and quash the same. For petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For respondents : Mr.A.Nagarajan for R1 Mr.R.Ravichandran, AGP for R2 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR,J) Mr.A.Nagarajan, learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation of Chennai takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.R.Ravichandran, learned Additional Government Pleade...
1.S.Ramadorai Vs. 1.M/S.Citizen Mills2.R.Shrinivasan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:07. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.1750 of 2012 1.S.Ramadorai 2.S.Balachandran .. Petitioners Vs. 1.M/s.Citizen Mills Partnership Firm rep.by it's partner Sanjay Dachand Ghodawat 2.R.Shrinivasan ..Respondents PRAYER Civil Revision is under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to E.P.No.332 of 2005 in Special Suit No.119 of 2001 (J.T.Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangli, State of Maharastra), pending on the file of the 1st Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruchirapalli and strike of the E.P.No.332 of 2005 in the Special Suit No.119 of 2001. !For petitioners .. Mr.A.Natarajan, Senior Counsel for M/s.K.K.Hema Karthikeyan & M.Karuppasamy ^For respondents .. No appearance - - - :ORDER The revision petitioners have preferred the above revision petition seeking a direction to call for the records relating to E.P.No.332 of 2005 in Special Suit No.119 of 2001 (J.T....
Muthusamy Vs. Managing Director of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporat ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.Nos.2546 of 2007 & 569 of 2002 Muthusamy ... Appellant in C.M.A.No.2546 of 2007 & R1 in C.M.A.No.569 of 2002 Vs. 1.The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., (Salem Division), Salem ... R1 in C.M.A.No.2546 of 2007 & Appellant in C.M.A.No.569 of 2002 2.P.Chandran 3.The United India Insurance Co., Salem-7 ... R2 & R3 in both C.M.A.Nos.2546 of 2007 & C.M.A.No.569 of 2002 PRAYER (in C.M.A.Nos.2546 of 2007 & 569 of 2002): Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 07.09.2001, made in M.C.O.P.No.1537 of 1998, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, III-Additional District Court, Salem. C.M.A.No.2546 of 2007: For Appellant : Mr.T.Murugamanickam For Respondents : Mr.S.S.Swaminathan for R1 Mr.C.R.Krishnamoorhi for R3 R2 - Given up C.M.A.No.569 of ...
Sankaralingam Vs. S.Rajasekaran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.3867 of 2008 Sankaralingam ... Appellant Vs. 1.S.Rajasekaran 2.The New India Assurance Co., Ltd., Chennai-1 ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 21.02.2008, made in M.C.O.P.No.3002 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Small Causes Court, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.A.N.Viswanatha Rao For Respondents : Mr.S.Subbiah for R1 Mr.M.Krishnamoorthy for R2 - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / claimant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 21.02.2008, made in M.C.O.P.No.3002 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Small Causes Court, Chennai.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The claimant, who is the grandfather of the deceased Sheema, had filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.3002 of 2006, on t...
N.C.Vijayaraghavan Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:07. 11.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Review Application No.128 of 2012 in Writ Petition No.2905 of 1996 N.C.Vijayaraghavan .... Petitioner Vs.1. Union of India, rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, Insurance Division, Lok Nayak Bhavan, Khan Market, New Delhi 110 003.2. General Insurance Corporation of India, rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, No.117, Jamshedji Tata Road, Church Gate, Bombay 400 020.3. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., rep. by its Chairman cum Managing Director, No.24, Whites Road, Madras 600 014. .... Respondents PETITION under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure to review the order dated 11.6.2012 made in W.P.No.2905 of 1996. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Yashod Vardhan, SC for M/s.K.Moorthy For Respondents: No appearance R1 & R2 Mrs.Rita Chandrsekaran for M/s.Aiyar &a...
S.Charulatha Vs. the Commissioner Hrce
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.No.26644 of 2013 S.Charulatha D/o.P.Sarojini Amma ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Energy Department, Chennai 600 009. 3.The Executive Engineer, O & M/Adayar, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Taramani Road, Chennai 600 113. 4.The Executive Engineer, Arulmighu Dhandeeswarar Thirukkovil, Velachery, Chennai 600 042. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus to direct the third respondent herein to enquire and submit a report upon the petitioner's representation dated 03.06.2013 which has been forwarded by the Vigilance Commission to the second respondent to take necessary action through their letter dated 19.06.2013 with letter No.2216/VC-1/2013-1 and pass such ...
1.The District Collector, Vs. Pala Nedumaran,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:07. 11.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.A.(MD).No.1186 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.The District Collector, Thanjore District, Thanjore. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjore District, Thanjore. 3.The Inspector of Police, Thanjore Taluk Police Station, Thanjore. 4.The President, Thanjore Panchayat Union, Vilar Village Panchayat, Thanjore District. .. Appellants Vs. Pala Nedumaran, Chairman, Board of Trustees of Ulagath Thamizhar Peramaippu Trust, No.6, South Lock Street, Kotturpuram, Chennai 84. .. Respondent PRAYER Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 05.11.2013 made in W.P.(MD).No.17942 of 2013 on the file of this Court. !For Appellants .. Mr.AL.Somayaji Advocate General Assisted by Mr.K.Chellapandian Additional Advocate General and Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader ^For Respondent .. Mr.K.M.Vijayan Senior Coun...
Jayalakshmi Vs. Ganapathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:05. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.369 of 2004 1.Jayalakshmi 2.Minor.Vinoth 3.Muthammal ... Appellants (minor 2nd appellant rep.by his next friend 1st appellant Jayalakshmi) Vs. 1.Ganapathy 2.The Branch Manager National Insurance Co., Ltd., Dharmapuri ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 04.07.2002, made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.330 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Additional Court, Dharmapuri. For Appellants : Mr.V.Kumaravelan For Respondents : Mrs.D.Kamatchi for R1 Mrs.R.Sreevidhya for R2 - - - JUDGMENT The appellants / claimants have preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 04.07.2001, made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.330 of 2002, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Additional Court, Dharmapuri.2. The short facts of the case are as...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »