Chennai Court November 2013 Judgments
Food Corporation of India Vs. K.M.George
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.A. NOS.2173 & 2174 OF2011& M.P.NOS.1 & 1 OF2011W.A. NO.2173 OF20111.Food Corporation of India, Rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director, Headquarters, 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi 110 001. 2.The Executive Director (South), Food Corporation of India, Zonal Office, No.3, Haddows Road, Chennai 600 006. 3.The General Manager, Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006. .. Appellants Versus 1.K.M.George 2.V.Swaminathan 3.V.S.Viswanathan 4.S.Vanchesan 5.V.Madhavan 6.S.Kameswaran 7.K.Krishnaswamy 8.A.Francis Dhanasingh 9.Jayasingh Lazarus 10.D.Alagappan 11.R.Subramaniam 12.K.Parthasarathy 13.M.S.Samppornam 14.C.Seeralan 15.T.P.Devarajan 16.M.K.Akthar Basha .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order of the learned single Judge d...
Tag this Judgment!Nadeem Leatherware Exports Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :29. 11.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Revision) No.28 of 2012 M/s.Nadeem Leatherware Exports No.23, Covelong Muthu Gramani Street, Periamet, Chennai 600 003. ... Petitioner -vs- The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Deputy Commissioner (CT) Now designated as Joint Commissioner (CT), Chennai (Central) Division PAPJM Buildings Greams Road, Chennai. ... Respondent Tax Case Revision filed under Section 38 of Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, (Additional Bench), Chennai dated 10.04.2012 passed in STA No.313 of 2007 for the assessment year 2001-02. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sundareswaran For Respondent : Mr.Manokar Sundaram Additional Government Pleader (Taxes) ORDER (The Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) Raising the following questions of law, the assessee is on revis...
Tag this Judgment!Sathiya Vs. Deputy Commissioner Excise
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 29.11.2013 CORAM: The Honourable Mr.Justice K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.Nos.31175 & 31176 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 and 2 & 2 of 2013 Sathiya .Petitioner in both W.Ps versus The Deputy Commissioner (Excise).Office of the Deputy Commissioner (Excise).Govt. of Puducherry, Puducherry.Respondent in both W.Ps Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the notification bearing No.7052/ThuAa(Ka)/Kisti/2013-14 dated 14.11.2013 on the file of the respondent and quash the same in so far as the same is relating to the Arrack Shop Nos.4(O).Karuvadikuppam and 3(O).Pillaichavady leased out to the petitioner and consequently, direct the respondent to adjust the monthly lease amounts of Rs.18,02,000/- and Rs.9,01,590/- payable by the petitioner to the above Arrack Shop for the months of July & August 2013 and (and a sum of Rs.1,46,41...
Tag this Judgment!The Divisional Manager, Vs. 1.G.Maheswari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 11/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.1227 of 2005 and C.M.P.(MD)No.8373 of 2005 & M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2007 The Divisional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, 618, Chamaraja Double Road, Mysore - 570 024. ... Appellant Vs. 1.G.Maheswari 4.Vijay ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the award of Rs.66,000/- (Rupees Sixty Six Thousand only) passed in M.C.O.P.No.1536 of 2001, dated 29.04.2005, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum I Additional District Judge, Madurai. !For Appellant ... Mr.K.Bhaskaran ^For Respondents ... Mr.L.Shaji Chellan for R-1 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.1536 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum I Additional District Judge, Madurai.2. The short fa...
Tag this Judgment!Ameer Haja Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29/11/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN Writ petition No.19277 of 2013 Ameer Haja ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Additional Chief Secretary to Government Environment and Forests Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Jeans Road, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai- 600 015. ... Respondents Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Proc.No.B1/66895/2008 dated 31.05.2013 quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to correct the petitioner's date of birth in the service register as 28.06.1957 instead of 08.11.1955 allowing the petitioner to continue in service till 30.06.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Selvaraj For Respondents : Mr.P.H.Aravind Pandian Additional Advocate General Assisted by...
Tag this Judgment!T.P.Mayavan Vs. Sowcar Gopaldass Dwaragadas Family Trust
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :29.11.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH A.S(MD)No.63 of 2012 T.P.Mayavan ... Appellant/Defendant vs. Sowcar Gopaldass Dwaragadas Family Trust Estate, Rep by its Managing Trustee, G.D.Ramdas, No.145, North Chithirai Street, Srirangam, Trichy - 6. ... Respondent/Plaintiff Prayer.. Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.29 of 2009, dated 26.04.2011, on the file of Additional District Court, Tiruchirappalli !For Appellant .. Mr.Amjadkhan, for Mr.N.Ananthapadmanathan ^For Respondent .. mr.T.S.R.Venkatramana :JUDGMENT The appellant who is defendant in the original suit filed this appeal suit against the judgment and decree of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Tiruchirappalli made in O.S.No.29 of 2009, dated 26.04.2011. 2.For the sake of convenience, the defendant in the suit referred as appellant herein and the plaintiff in the above said suit...
Tag this Judgment!Annammal Vs. B.R.Syan Larel Rex
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU S.A.No.1301 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.Annammal Bala Xavier (died) 2.S.Francis 3.Rita 4.Amul 5.S.Arokyasamy 6.Nirmala 7.Chritary 8.Bibiane Seline 9.A.Maartha Mary 10.Lilli 11.S.B.Robin 12.S.B.Johyny ... Appellants/Defendants vs.1. B.R.Syan Larel Rex 2. Minor B.R.Akash Noyal Rex (Minor represented by his mother, next friend Guardian T.L.Arokyamary) ... Respondents/Plaintiffs Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2013 in A.S.No.19 of 2003 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur confirming the judgment and decree dated 13.4.1998 passed in O.S.No.801/1982 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruvallur. For Appellant : Mr.M.S.Subramanian For Respondent : Mr.D.Gopinath for Caveator. JUDGMENT The defendants are the appellants and the plaintiffs are the respondents. The second appeal is filed against the judgment and decree ...
Tag this Judgment!T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.No.18548 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 T.Bhuvaneswari .. Petitioner Versus 1. The District Collector cum District Magistrate, Erode District. Erode.2. The Deputy General Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., K.R.Thoppu, Konakkapadi (PO), Karukalwadi Village, Tharamangalam (Via), Omalur Taluk, Salem District, Salem.3. The Chief Engineer, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. 765 KV DC Line, 17/4, Vivekanandar Street, Ghandi Nagar, Naciyanoor Road, Erode. .. Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the 1st respondent proceeding in Na.Ka.No.354/2013/k4 dated 13.06.2013 and quash the same and forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from in any manner erecting or installing, High Tension Electricity Line 765 Kilo Volt DC Line, above the pet...
Tag this Judgment!Thayanban Vs. Ponnammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT MADRAS DATED:29. .11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN C.R.P.(PD).Nos.2574, 2575 and 2900 to 2906 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 (9 Nos.) Thayanban .. Petitioner in all the C.R.Ps vs.1. Ponnammal 2. Rajeswari 3. Vasantha 4. Kumar Viswanathan 5. Siva Subramanian 6. Jayshree 7. Dr.Ravi K.Viswanathan 8. Land Acquisition Officer & Special Tahsildar (L.A) Kancheepuram Unit, Chennai Metro Rail Limited, Gopalapuram, Chennai - 600 086. .. Respondents in all the C.R.Ps (Respondents 4 & 6 represented by Their Power of Attorney Agent Dr.Ravi K.Viswanathan) Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order, dated 19.06.2013 passed in I.A.No.25 of 2013 in L.A.O.P.No.10 of 2012, I.A.No.26 of 2013 in L.A.O.P.No.11 of 2012, I.A.No.27 of 2013 in L.A.O.P.No.13 of 2012, I.A.No.28 of 2013 in L.A.O.P.No.14 of 2012, I.A.No.29 of 2013 in L.A.O.P.No.27 of 2012, I.A.No.30 of 2013 in L.A.O...
Tag this Judgment!G.Uthiramuthu Vs. M.C.Sugumaran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 11.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.M.A.No.1646 of 2004 G.Uthiramuthu ... Appellant ..Vs..1. M.C.Sugumaran 2. V.M.Nazar 3. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., RVR Buildings, 2nd Floor, No.4, Head Quarters Road, Coimbatore 641 018 (Notice to R-1 given up) ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree, dated 29.09.2003, made in MCOP No.8 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Sub Court, Bhavani. For Appellant : Mr. C.Deivasigamani For Respondents : Mr. R.Sreevidhya, for R-3 R-2 exparte, R-1 given up - - - JUDGMENT This case highlights the highly insensitive and apathetic attitude harboured by some of us, living a normal healthy life, towards those unfortunate fellowmen who fell victim to some incapacitating disability. The facts of the case reveal that officers of the Punjab State Electricity Board were quite aw...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »