Chennai Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.G.N.S.Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of the Department of Geology and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:11. 10.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR W.P.No.27870 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2013 R.G.N.S.Enterprises, rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr.M.Gokulakannan ... Petitioner Versus 1. The Commissioner, Department of Geology and Mining, Thiru.Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.2. The District Collector, Nilgiri District.3. The Superintendent of Police, Nilgiri District.4. The District Forest Officer, Gudalur, Nilgiri District.5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gudalur, Nilgiri District.6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Devela and Gudalur, Nilgiri District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writs of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's right to carry on trade and petitioner's customer right to transport sand from Puducherry to Kerala and other States with valid documents checked and vouched by the bord...
New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. G.K.Srinivasan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :11. .10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH C.M.A.Nos.3402 and 3680 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 in C.M.A.No.3402 of 2011 C.M.A.No.3402 of 2011: The New India Assurance Company Limited, No.45, 2nd Line Beach, Moore Street, Chennai-1. ... Appellant vs. 1.G.K.Srinivasan (rep. by his wife Amutha as natural guardian) 2.V.Ramsingh 3.Dhayalan ... Respondents C.M.A.No.3680 of 2011: G.K.Srinivasan (Comatose) rep. by his wife & next friend Amutha ... Appellant vs. 1.V.Ramsingh 2.The New India Assurance Company Limited, No.45, 2nd Line Beach, Moore Street, Chennai-11. 3.Dhayalan ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeals have been filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the fair and decretal order dated 18.4.2011 made in M.C.O.P.No.775 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / VI Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. C.M.A.No.3402 of 2011: For appellant ...
The Branch Manager, M/S. Vrl Logistics Limited and Others Vs. M. Gunas ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Oct-10-2013
(This appeal coming before us for final hearing on 01.10.2013 and on hearing the arguments of both sides and upon perusing the material records, this Commission made the following:) J. Jayaram, Presiding Judicial Member 1. This appeal is filed by the opposite parties against the order of the District Forum, Salem, in C.C.No.102/2010, dated 12.07.2011, allowing the complaint against the opposite parties. 2. The case of the complainant is that on 04.08.2009, he entrusted handloom goods worth Rs.20,880/- to the 1st opposite party for transportation from Salem to Bellary, Karnataka and the consignment was booked as With Pass Booking which means that the opposite party has to deliver the goods booked within three days and the delivery pass (consignee copy) was also entrusted to them. The goods were not delivered to the consignee and when he contacted the 2nd opposite party they were informed that the goods were kept in their godown and due to water flooding the goods were completely damage...
Indian Institute of Technology Madras Office at Guindy, Represented by ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Oct-10-2013
(The complainant filed a complaint before this Commission against the opposite party praying for a direction to the opposite party to settle /pay the insurance claim of Rs.20,00,000/- to the 2nd complainant and to pay Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony and to pay costs. This complaint coming before us for final hearing on 08.08.2013 and heard the arguments on either side, this Commission made the following order:) A.K. Annamalai, Judicial Member The complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act. 1. The complainant praying for direction to the opposite party to settle / pay to the 2nd complainant, the insurance claim dated 2.3.2009 for a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- being the amount payable in respect of Prof.V.Damodara Das, an insured member of the Indian Institute of Technology Madras Group Term Insurance Scheme along with interest at 12% and to pay Rs.5,00,000/- towards mental agony for the wrongful rejection of the claim and to pay costs. 2. The case of the...
Ranganayaki Vs. Valli
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.2433 of 2004 Ranganayaki ... Appellant Vs. 1.Valli 2.United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Nagapattinam ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 19.04.2004, made in M.C.O.P.No.169 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional Sub Court, Nagapattinam. For Appellant : Mrs.S.T.P.Kuilmozhi For Respondents : Mr.P.Kandasamy for R2 R1-Ex parte - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / claimant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 19.04.2004, made in M.C.O.P.No.169 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional Sub Court, Nagapattinam.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The claimant had filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.169 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional Su...
1.K.S.Kuppukannan Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07/10/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.7050 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 of 2013 1.K.S.Kuppukannan 2.G.Nagarathinam 3.M.K.J.J.Abraham 4.S.Bharathi 5.T.Palanivel 6.R.Pugalendhi 7.R.Subburaj 8.S.Sridharan 9.P.Chellakumari ..Petitioners vs 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Finance (T & A) Department, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015. 3.The Director of Social Welfare Department, Sindadiripet, Chennai-600 002. 4.V.Kasthuri 5.N.Sekar 6.S.Kadhiravan 7.T.K.Lalitha 8.A.Vadivel 9.K.B.Rajendran 10.C.Meena 11.R.Sridharan 12.B.Poongothai 13.C.Senthil Kumar 14.N.Nirmala 15.N.E.Chitra 16.R.Arasu 17.N.Jayanthi 18.G.Indira 19.T.G.Jeyasankar 20.K.Gunasekari 21.S.Sasikala 22.G.Govindaraj 23.S.Karthick 24.V.Sundararaman 25.G.Kannan Udaya Singh 26.S.Rajalakshmi 27.V.Nagalingam 28.M.Viswanathan 29.T.Leela Vinodhini (R4 to R29 implea...
C.B.Shankar Vs. Managing Director of Metropolitan Transport Corpn. Ltd ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :07. 10.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Nos.2081 and 2605 of 2011 1.C.B.Shankar 2.S.Dachayani 3.C.M.Mohan Raj 4.C.M.Lekha .. Appellants in CMA.No.2081/2011 and Respondents 1 to 4 in CMA.No.2605/2011 vs. The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corpn. Ltd., Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2. .. Respondent in CMA.No.2081/2011 and Appellant in CMA.No.2605/2011 Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Order dated 30.11.2010 made in M.C.O.P.No.4098 of 2009 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes]., Chennai. For Appellants : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram in CMA.2081/2011 & Respondents 1 to 4 in CMA.2605/2011 For Respondent in : Mr.B.Vijayalakshmi CMA.2081/2011 & Appellant in CMA.2605/2011 COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.BANUMATHI,J) Being diss...
T.Sankaralingam Vs. Director of Public Health
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :07. 10.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.1194 of 2009 T.Sankaralingam .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Teynampet Chennai 6 2. The Deputy Director of Health Services, Sivakasi Virudhunagar District .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to grant Selection Grade, Special Grade and bonus increments to the petitioner counting 10 years, 20 years, and 30 years from the date of regularisation of the petitioner in the post of Basic Health Inspector along with Health Inspector as has been done in similar cases and as ordered by the Government in the case of Health Assistants absorbed as Multipurpose Health Supervisors with effect from the date fixed by Government in the pay commission G.O's for grant of such conferment and consequently refix the scale of pay of...
Pattammal Vs. Shahul Hameed
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.2432 of 2004 Pattammal ... Appellant Vs. 1.Shahul Hameed 2.New India Assurance Co., Ltd., Nagapattinam ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 07.04.2004, made in M.C.O.P.No.167 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional Sub Court, Nagapattinam. For Appellant : Mrs.S.T.P.Kuilmozhi For Respondents : Mr.P.Kandasamy for R2 R1-Ex parte - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / claimant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 07.04.2004, made in M.C.O.P.No.167 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional Sub Court, Nagapattinam.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The claimant had filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.167 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional...
R.Gopal Vs. E.Thirunavukkarasu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.1168 of 2009 R.Gopal ... Appellant Vs. 1.E.Thirunavukkarasu 2.The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Chennai-1 ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 05.09.2008, made in M.C.O.P.No.3689 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Small Causes Court No.II, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.Um.Ravichandran For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh Babu for R2 R1-Served - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / claimant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 05.09.2008, made in M.C.O.P.No.3689 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Small Causes Court No.II, Chennai.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The claimant had filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.3689 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sma...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »