Skip to content

Chennai Court October 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 21 2013

A.Pandi Vs. 1.The Managing Director,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-21-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21. 10/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P(MD)No.15620 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2013 A.Pandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd, Head Office, No.12,Thambusami Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 2.Christy Friedgram Industry, A-2&A-3, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Andipalayam, Tiruchengode-637 214. 3.Rasi Nutri Foods, 1/67-A & 1/67-B, Salem-Trichy Main Road, Ayeepalayam, Athanur Post, Namakkal District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first Respondent to continue with the tender proceedings as per proceedings RC NO.BS6/ 98682/2012 dated 20.06.2013 and the proceedings RC.No.BS6/98682/2012 dated 21.06.2013 respectively on the file of the 1st Respondent and submit the evaluation report to this Hon'ble Court for appropri...


Oct 21 2013

Maheswari Vs. Supreme India Roadlines

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-21-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :21. 10.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.395 of 2009 1.Maheswari 2.Guhan 3.Diwakar 4.Padmavathi ... Appellants. 2nd and 3rd Appellants declared as major as per the order in M.P.No.1 of 2013 dt. 10.10.2013 vs. 1.M/s.Supreme India Roadlines, No.303/1, Sydenhams Road, Nehru Timber Market, Chennai-600 112. 2.The New India Assurance Company Ltd., No.156, C.S.T. Road, Hotel Yogi International Buildings, First Floor, Kalina, Mumbai. ... Respondents. Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Order dated 28.08.2008 made in M.C.O.P.No.512 of 2004 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Principal Subordinate Judge]., Tindivanam. For Appellants : Mr.R.Natesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Manohar No.2 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by R.BANUMATHI,J) Being dissatisfied with the quantum of compe...


Oct 21 2013

Annammal Vs. K.Velyuda Mudaliar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-21-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.10.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.503 of 2005 1.Annammal 2.Ashokan 3.Elumalai 4.Valliammal .Appellant vs 1.K.Velyuda Mudaliar 2.The United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office, Ranipet.Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated 05.11.2003 made in M.C.O.P.No.934 of 2002 (Ranipet Sub-Court M.C.O.P.No.363/99) on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District and Sessions Judge / Fast Track Court No.II ).Ranipet, Vellore District so far as awarding lesser compensation. For Appellant : Mr.N.S.Sivakumar For Respondents: R1 & R2 Served JUDGMENT The claimants stated that on 28.06.1999, at about 5.30 p.m., when the 1st claimant's husband namely Raji was proceeding on his bicycle on the Katpadi Main Road, the 1st respondent's lorry bearing Registration No.TN-23-A-5256, driven by its driver in a neglige...


Oct 21 2013

N.Sivasakthivel Vs. Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-21-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :21. 10.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.3062 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009 N.Sivasakthivel ... Petitioner vs.1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.2. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai.3. The Executive Officer, Kurinchi Third Grade Municipality, Kurinchi, Coimbatore. .. Respondents * * * Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the proceedings of the second respondent in N.K.No.14521/06/S4 dated 22.05.2008 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner by appointing him as Junior Assistant/Bill Collector as per G.O.Ms.No.125 (MAWS Department), dated 27.05.1999. * * * For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vijay Shankar For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Dhan...


Oct 18 2013

Aandi Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-18-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 10/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.18327 of 2013 Aandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police Tuticorin District, Tuticorin 2.The Inspector of Police Sipcot Police Station Sipcot, Tuticorin 3.The State rep.by it's the Inspector of Police Thattapparai Police station Tuticorin District ... Respondents PRAYER Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second and third respondents herein to conduct further investigation in Crime No.511 of 2005, on the file of the third respondent herein as per the orders passed in Crl.M.P.No.6088 of 2006, dated 03.03.2006, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Tuticorin. !For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Vijayakumar ^For Respondents ... Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate - - - :ORDER The petitioner herein has filed the above criminal original petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a d...


Oct 11 2013

M.Thonthi Vs. Presiding Officer of Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-11-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:- 11-10-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.12196 of 2005 M.Thonthi ... Petitioner Versus 1. The Presiding Officer, Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court Shastri Bhavan Haddows Road Chennai 6.2. The Management of Central Bank of India Rep. By its Zonal Manager 48/49 Montieth Road Egmore Chennai 8 ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records from the first respondent in I.D.No.423 of 2001 and quash its impugned Award dated 24.12.2001 insofar as the 1st respondent has denied and negatived the claim of the petitioner for reinstatement in service, with continuity of service, with back wages and with all other attendant and consequential benefits. For Petitioner :- Mr.K.M.Ramesh For Respondents :- Mr.V.Karthic for M/s.T.S.Gopalan for R2 ORDER The challenge in this writ petition is again...


Oct 11 2013

Prema Balasubramanian Vs. Union of India

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-11-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.20883 of 2013 Prema Balasubramanian .Petitioner ..vs.1.The Union of India, Rep. By the Chief Administrative Officer (Construction).Southern Railways, Chennai 600 008. 2.The Divisional Railway Manager/ Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Railway, Salem Division, Salem 635 005. 3.The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, (Chennai Bench).High Court Buildings, Chennai 108...Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent relating to the order dated 12.06.2013 passed in O.A.No.1397 of 2011 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents 1 and 2 to pay a sum of Rs.34,952/- to the petitioner being the difference in Gratuity payable by the respondents 1 and 2 as per the pr...


Oct 11 2013

S.Sivasubramaniam Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-11-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:11. 10.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.M.A.No.1443 of 2006 and C.M.P.No.6470 of 2006 S.Sivasubramaniam .. Appellant/appellant ..Vs.. 1.Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Cum Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028. 2.District Revenue Officer, (Stamps) Coimbatore. 3.Sub-Registrar, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore District. .. Respondents/respondents Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under sub Section (10) of Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 against the proceedings of the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Cum Inspector General of registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028 and made in No.15666/N2/2005, dated 13.2.2006 in confirming the proceedings of the District Revenue Officer (Stamps), Coimbatore made in Mu.Pa.No.391/M/03, dated 24.12.2004. For Appellant :Mr. S.Muthiah for Mr.N.Damodaran For Respondent : Ms.M.Jayashree, Spl.Govt.Pleader ------ JUDGMENT The appellant has c...


Oct 11 2013

K.Swaminathan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-11-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :11. 10.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.14018 of 2010 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2010 1. K.Swaminathan 2. R.Soundararajan .. Petitioners Vs.1. State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Department Fort St.George, Chennai 9 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Mayiladuthurai Nagapattinam.3. The Tahsildar Kuttalam Mayiladuthurai Nagapattinam District 4. The Tahsildar Mayiladuthurai Taluk Nagapattinam District .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records which culminated in passing of G.O.(D) No.470 Revenue Department dated 16.11.2009 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same in so far as it denies the petitioners annual increments and other monetary benefits which the petitioners received till 2004 and consequently direct the respondents to disburse...


Oct 11 2013

S.Valaiyapathy Vs. Indian Overseas Bank

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-11-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:11/10/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN Writ petition No.23609 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 S.Valaiyapathy .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Indian Overseas Bank, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Central Office, No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. 2.The General Manager, Personnel Administration Department, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Office, No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. 3.Mr.L.Balasubramanian 4.Mr.S.Srinivasan .. Respondents Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus, to forbear the first respondent-Bank from permitting the respondents 3 and 4 to participate in the negotiations and discussions with the Bank-Management in respect of any matter pertaining to employer-employee relations of the Bank. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathia Chandran For Respondents : Mr.N.G.R.Prasad for R-1 and R-2 For Mr.K.Srinivasamurthy Mr.A.L.Somaiyaji, Senior C...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial