Chennai Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Agoram Vs. V.Sekar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.2706 of 2009 V.Agoram ... Appellant Vs. 1.V.Sekar 2.National Insurance Company Ltd., Chennai-2 ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 23.02.2006, made in M.C.O.P.No.3722 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District Court), Fast Track Court No.II, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.S.Natarajan For Respondents : Mr.J.Chandran for R2 R1-Served - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / claimant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 23.02.2006, made in M.C.O.P.No.3722 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District Court), Fast Track Court No.II, Chennai.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The claimant had filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.3722 of 2001, on the file of the Motor...
V.Boovaraghamoorthy Vs. District Revenue Officer of Villupuram Distric ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :24. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.15885 of 2013 V.Boovaraghamoorthy .. Petitioner -vs- 1. The District Revenue Officer Villupuram District, Villupuram 2. Kannappa Chettiar .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned notice dated 05.06.2013 in Na.Ka.No.A2/18838/12 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner :: Mr.S.Silambanan Senior Counsel for Mr.J.Bharathi Raja For Respondents :: Mr.R.Vijayakumar Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.C.Prakasam for R2 ORDER This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Mr.V.Boovaraghamoorthy challenging the impugned notice dated 5.6.2013 issued in Na.Ka.No.A2/18838/12 by the first respondent-District Revenue Officer, Villupuram inter alia, among other grounds, that the suit property covered i...
Sheikh Abdul Khader Vs. Balu and United India Insurance
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.959 of 2007 Sheikh Abdul Khader ... Appellant Vs. 1.Balu 2.United India Insurance Co., Ltd., rep.by it's Branch Manager Madurai Taluk and District ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 24.04.2006, made in M.C.O.P.No.193 of 2004, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tiruvarur. For Appellant : Mr.N.Anand Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.S.Arunkumar for R2 R1-Served - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / claimant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 24.04.2006, made in M.C.O.P.No.193 of 2004, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tiruvarur.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The claimant had filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.193 of 2004, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tiruvarur, claimi...
Chelladurai Alias Alex Vs. State Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-24-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:24. 10/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY Criminal Appeal (MD).No.206 of 2012 Chelladurai alias Alex .. Appellant vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Tenkasi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. Crime No.312 of 2010. .. Respondent Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. against the conviction and sentence passed in the judgment dated 9.8.2011 in S.C.No.107 of 2011 by the Additional Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court No.II, Tirunelveli District. !For appellant ... Mr.S.Durairaj ^For respondent ... Mr.K.S.Duraipandi Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT M.DURAISWAMY, J This appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence ordered against the first accused in the judgment dated 9.8.2011 made in S.C.No.107 of 2011 by the Additional Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court No.II, Tirunelveli District. By this judgment, the first accused/appellant in this appe...
All India Overseas Bank Employees Union Vs. R.Shankar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 10/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Application No.4867 of 2013 and O.A.No.808 of 2013 in C.S.No.711 of 2013 P-1 ALL INDIA OVERSEAS BANK EMPLOYEES UNION REP.BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY NO.763, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI06Vs R-1 R.SHANKAR INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, PRINTING AND STATIONERY DEPT NARAGANA SABHA CHENNAI18R-2 M.VENKATACHALAM INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, STAFF COLLEGE, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI40R-3 A.ASHOK KUMAR INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK AMBATHUR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BRANCH, CHENNAI R-4 P.S.VASUNDARAMANI SARJOO VILLA P/2, RAMASAMY STREET, T.NAGAR, CHENNAI17R-5 K.RAJAMANICKAM NO.34/14, 1ST STREET NETAJI NAGAR, ENNORE, CHENNAI57R-6 N. SRIDHARAN CHARIMAN ELECTION COMMITTEE34H GENERAL COUNCIL MEETING AIOBEU763ANNA SALAI CHENNAI2R-7 INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR763ANNA SALAI CHENNAI R-8 MR L BALASUBRAMANIAN8BHOPATHY ST VIRUGAMBAKAM CHENNAI92R-9 MR. S. SRINIVASAN NL6/20/4 SECTOR9NERUL EAST NAVI MUMBAI400706 ORDER Applica...
M.Arumugham Vs. S.Nanam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.188 of 2009 1.M.Arumugham 2.A.Krishnaveni ... Appellants Vs. 1.S.Nanam 2.The United India Ins.Co.Ltd., Anna Salai, Chennai-2 ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 18.02.2008, made in M.C.O.P.No.2009 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Small Causes Court No.IV at Chennai. For Appellants : Mr.T.G.Balachandran For Respondents : Mr.J.Chandran for R2 R1-Ex parte - - - JUDGMENT The appellants / claimants have preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18.02.2008, made in M.C.O.P.No.2009 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Small Causes Court No.IV at Chennai.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- Originally, one Mrs.A.Lakshmi had filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.2009 of 2003, on the file of...
Macro Marvel Projects Ltd. Glenden Place Vs. V. Vijayanarayanan
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Oct-23-2013
(This appeal coming before us for final hearing on 25.09.2013 and on hearing the arguments of both sides and upon perusing the material records, this Commission made the following Order:) J. Jayaram, Judicial Member This appeal is filed by the opposite party against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chennai [North]) in C.C.214/2007, dated 8-12-2008, allowing the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant is that the opposite party is engaged in selling plots for constructing houses. The complainant paid an advance of Rs.1 Lac to the opposite party in the month of March 2006 for a plot. The complainant is an NRI based at Singapore and for the purpose of purchasing a plot and constructing a house, he had to come over to Chennai several times to meet the opposite party. He was initially allotted plot No.77 and later when he met the opposite party, he said that plot No.77 which was originally allotted to him was not available then and so he was allotted another pl...
Mrs. N. Thulasimani Vs. Senior Divisional Manager, the New India Assur ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Oct-23-2013
(This appeal coming before us for final hearing on 19.08.2013 and on hearing the arguments of both sides and upon perusing the material records, this Commission made the following Order:) J. Jayaram, Judicial Member This appeal is filed by the complainant against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Coimbatore in C.C.380/2008, dated 11-05-2010, dismissing the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant is that her husband was an Advocate at Coimbatore, who met with road accident on 17-08-2004 and sustained head injuries and was admitted in Ramakrishna Hospital, Coimbatore, where he expired on 7-10-2004 leaving behind his wife who is the complainant herein and his minor daughter, as his legal heirs. Her husband had joined the Group Insurance Scheme of the 1st opposite party / Insurance company, but her claim was repudiated by the 1st opposite party which amounts to deficiency in service on the part of the 1st opposite party. Hence the complaint praying for directio...
investment Funds Manager, Standard Chartered Bank Vs. Anandha Krishnan
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Oct-23-2013
(This appeal coming before us for final hearing on 25.09.2013 and on hearing the arguments of both sides and upon perusing the material records, this Commission made the following Order:) J. Jayaram, Judicial Member This appeal is filed by the opposite party against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chennai [North] in C.C.102/2008, dated 02-03-2010, allowing the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant is that he had invested Rs.4,50,000/- in Mutual Funds through the opposite party on 16-12-2004 and he redeemed the same on 31-12-2005 and he was entitled to receive the sum of Rs.4,84,218/-, but he was paid only a sum of Rs.4,66,843-50 and the amount was credited to his Coimbatore account on the same day. He further invested in the mutual fund through the opposite party an amount of Rs.72,000/- on 21-12-2005 and the amount was redeemed on 2-2-2006 but the amount was credited to his account only on 16-02-2006. He had further invested an amount of Rs.3,44,787-20...
Madras Race Club Vs. M.Victor
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:23. 10.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN Application No.1207 of 2013 in C.S.No.72 of 2013 The Madras Race Club rep. by its Secretary Guindy Chennai 600 032. .. Applicant Vs.1. M.Victor 2. M.Guru 3. V.Sivan 4. E.Rajini 5. A.Elumalai 6. V.Manoharan 7. K.Veeran 8. M.Pattu 9. K.Shanmugam 10.R.Kesavan 11.E.Ravi 12.M.Padma 13.N.Selvam 14.S.Shantha 15.K.Asai 16.V.Mani 17.R.Sudhar 18.V.Jayaraman 19.S.Venkatesh 20.M.Chellappan 21.R.Perumal 22.D.Ravi 23.M.Rajendran 24.S.Rajapeter 25.M.Jesudoss 26.V.Gipsonraj 27.S.Mahendran 28.P.Punniyakoti 29.G.M.Murugan 30.M.Murugan 31.V.Venkatesan 32.G.Mani 33.J.Mohanraj 34.S.Shanmugham 35.M.Srinivasan 36.R.Srinivasan 37.A.Sekar 38.N.Sekar 39.G.K.Rajendran 40.K.Samuel 41.K.Thirunavukarasu 42.D.Loganathan 43.M.Jesudoss 44.V.Kotti 45.R.Selvam 46.M.Mani 47.D.Madhan Mohan 48.M.Murali Krishnan 49.M.Maridoss 50.D.Suguna 51.M.Krishnan 52.N.Raja 53.S.Sivaprakasam 54.R.A.Arumugam 55.E.Manonmani 56.E.Vija...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »