Skip to content

Chennai Court October 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 29 2013

K.Parthasarathy Vs. Insepctor of Police of Kannankuruchi Police Statio ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 10/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI Crl.O.P.No.21582 of 2013 K.PARTHASARATHY . VS THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, KANNANKURUCHI POLICE STATION SALEM DISTRICT. ( CR.NO.132/2013 ) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the offence punishable under Secs.294(b), 342, 324 IPC @ 294(b), 342, 324 and 302 IPC in Cr.No.132 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is as follows: The deceased Sirajudeen borrowed a sum of Rs.25,000/- from one Balu (A.1) and he did not repay the loan. On 29.4.2013, the deceased was taken to a remote place by A.1 and by one Elumalai (A.2). They demanded the repayment of the loan. In the process, the deceased was tide up to a mango tree and was beaten up by A.1 and A.2 and was illegally detained and such assault continued till 6.5.2013. The deceased was left unconscious and on regaining consciousness, he himself went to the Government Hospi...


Oct 29 2013

Gnanasekaran Vs. Assistant Director of Fisheries

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 29.10.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice R.BANUMATHI and The Honourable Mr.Justice R.SUBBIAH W.A.No.2164 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Gnanasekaran ...Appellant/Petitioner ..vs.1.The Assistant Director of Fisheries, (Aqua Culture).Chidambaram-608 001, Cuddalore Disrict. 2.The Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 3.The Tahsildar, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Kurinjipadi, Cuddalore District. 4.The Village Administrative Officer, Serakuppam, Vadalur, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District...Respondents/Respondents Prayer:- Writ Appeal has been filed under Clause 15 of Letters of Patent against the order dated 03.08.2012 made in W.P.No.18175.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.R.Gururaj For Respondents : Mr.N.Sakthivel, Government Advocate. JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBBIAH, J.,) Being aggrieved over the order of dismissal dated 03.08.2012 made in W.P.No.18175 of 2012 passed by the ...


Oct 29 2013

Samsudeen Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Habeas Corpus Petition (Md.No.949 of 2013 Samsudeen ..Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai District. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, calling for the entire records connected with the detention order of the second respondent in No.37/BDFGISSV/2013, dated 21.05.2013 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu by name Tajudeen @ PEI Tajudeen son of Samsudeen, aged about 24 years detained in Madurai Central Prison before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith. !For Petitioner .Mr.T.J...


Oct 29 2013

Mangaleswari Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.10.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Habeas Corpus Petition (Md.No.871 of 2013 Mangaleswari ...Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector cum the District Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records, connected with the detention order of the respondent No.2 in Cr.M.P.No.20/F.O./2013, dated 31.07.2013 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner's husband Villayutham, Son of Veluthevar, aged 47 years detained in Madurai Central Prison, before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith. !...


Oct 29 2013

A.Shivaiah Vs. Fues Gear Electrical Limited

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.2479 of 2006 A.Shivaiah ... Appellant Vs. Fues Gear Electrical Limited Velthangai Village Thangalam Ani Sriperumbuthur-602 105 ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1925, against the order dated 24.05.2004, made in W.C.No.195 of 2003, on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II / Commissioner for Workmen Compensation-2, Chennai-6. For Appellant : Mr.T.Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.T.S.Murthi - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / applicant has preferred the present appeal against the order dated 24.05.2004, made in W.C.No.195 of 2003, on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II/Commissioner for Workmen Compensation-2, Chennai-6.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The applicant had filed a claim petition in W.C.No.195 of 2003, on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II / Commissio...


Oct 29 2013

Sathasivam Vs. Shanmugam

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.2044 of 2009 Sathasivam ... Appellant Vs. 1.Shanmugam 2.The Manager New India Assurance Company Arakkonam-631 001 ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2005, made in M.C.O.P.No.796 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court, Fast Track Court No.V, Tiruvallur. For Appellant : Mr.G.Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh Babu for R2 Not ready notice for R1 - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / claimant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2005, made in M.C.O.P.No.796 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court, Fast Track Court No.V, Tiruvallur.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The claimant had filed a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No....


Oct 29 2013

Pentasoft Technologies Ltd Vs. Dycommissioner of Income Tax

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :29. 10.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Appeal) No.1195 of 2008 M/s.Pentasoft Technologies Ltd., 'Taurus', No.25, I Main Road United India Colony Kodambakkam Chennai 600 024. ... Appellant vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle V (2) Chennai 600 034. ... Respondent Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench dated 06.02.2008 in ITA No.1540/Mds/2006 for the assessment year 2002-2003. For appellant : Dr.Anita Sumanth For respondent : Mr.N.V.Balaji Standing counsel for Income Tax Department JUDGMENT (The Judgment of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.) This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 06.02.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [Tribunal]. in ITA No.1540/Mds/2006 for the assessment year 20...


Oct 29 2013

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shabidha

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Civil Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Appeal No.2782 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 M/s.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., No.45, Moore Street, Chennai. ... Appellant/2nd Respondent vs. 1.Shabidha, 2.Minor Sathish Kumar, 3.Minor R.Gokulnath, 4.Vanathatchi, 5.Kwality Building Products, No.5, Alapakkam, Maduravoyal, Chennai-116. (Minors 2 and 3 are represented by their mother and next friend, the first petitioner). (5th respondent remained ex parte in lower court. Hence notice may be dispensed with) ... Respondents/Petitioners 1 to 4 and 1st Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award and decree dated 24.11.2012 passed in M.C.O.P.No.1059 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Court of Small Causes), Chennai. For appellant : Mr.M.B.Raghavan For respondents...


Oct 29 2013

N.Sundar Vs. N.Suresh Babu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 10-2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN Tr.C.M.P.No.29 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1. N.Sundar 2. N.Chandrasekaran ............ Petitioners vs.1. N.Suresh Babu 2. C.Muruganandham .......... Respondents Petition filed under Section 24 (1) (b) of CPC, seeking an order to withdraw and transfer the suit in O.S.No.45 of 2012 from the file of the Principal District Court, Thanjavur to the file of this Court (Original side). For Petitioners : Mr.M.Kalyanasundaram Senior Counsel for Mr.G.Sethuraman For Respondents : Mr.A.Seshan for R1 No appearance for R2 ORDER This Tr.C.M.P has been filed under Section 24 (1) (b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking an order to transfer the suit in O.S.No.45 of 2012 from the file of the Principal District Court, Thanjavur to the file of the Original side of this Court.2. The suit was filed by the first respondent herein against the petitioners and the second respondent herein, seeking par...


Oct 29 2013

Dr.C.Athimuthu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 10.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Writ Petition No.18039 of 2011 1. Dr.C.Athimuthu 2. Dr.S.Ilangovan 3. Dr.R.Geetha 4. Dr.S.Uthaya Sankar 5. Dr.P.Pandiarajan 6. Dr.S.Mathiazhagan 7. Dr.R.J.Ranimuthulakshmi 8. Dr.R.K.Murugalakshmi 9. Dr.P.Ravi 10. Dr.Hajamoideen 11. Dr.P.Raja 12. Dr.R.Rajendran 13. Dr.V.Mohandas 14. Dr.A.Selvam 15. Dr.Karmegaraj 16. Dr.Sivasubramanian ... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Chenni-9.2. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.3. The Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Department, Panagal Palace, Saidapet, Chennai-15. ... Respondents Prayer:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents herein to direct the respective District Colle...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial