Skip to content

Chennai Court October 2013 Judgments

Oct 31 2013

A. Murugan Vs. Union of India Rep. by Chief of Army Staff Ministry of ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on: Oct-31-2013

L.t. Gen Anand Mohan Verma, Member-Administrative: 1. This application has been filed seeking relief of quashing first respondents letter No.C/07564/DV-3(B), dated 3.5.2003 and to direct the respondents to treat the order of dismissal as one of compulsory retirement to enable the petitioner to get pension and other terminal benefits. 2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner, who was enrolled in Aug 1989, was granted leave from 3.8.1999 to 14.8.1999, but he failed to rejoin Unit on expiry of theleave and rejoined on 10.3.2000. Thereafter, he again absented himself without leave with effect from 30.4.2000 and rejoined on 19.8.2000 , whereafter Summary of Evidence was recorded following which he was tried by a Summary Court Martial on 30.9.2000 in which a sentence was inflicted on the applicant as dismissed from service. He filed a petition against the dismissal order which was rejected by the then Chief of Army Staff on 3.5.2003. The petitioner filed O.A.No.36 of 2012 along with ...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2013

C.John Masilamani Vs. Tncivil Supply Corporation Ltd

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 10-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. Justice S.TAMILVANAN W.P.No.11394 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.12415 of 2005 C.John Masilamani ..Petitioner Vs. 1.Chairman Cum Managing Director Tamil Nadu Civil Supply Corporation Limited No.41, Thambusami Road Kilpauk, Chennai 10. 2.The General Manager (Administration) Tamil Nadu Civil Supply Corporation Limited No.41, Thambusami Road Kilpauk, Chennai 10. 3.The Senior Regional Manager Tamil Nadu Civil Supply Corporation Limited No.7, Constranswimth Road Gopalapuram Chennai - 86. ...... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. R.N.Amarnath For Respondents : Mr. V.Selvanayagam Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking an order in the nature of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the third respondent in proceeding No.A17/194/2001 dated 15/3/2004 and the consequential order passed by the second respondent in A.D.No.1/...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2013

1.Katturaja Vs. State, Rep.by

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29/10/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Referred Trial (Md.No.1 of 2013 and Crl.A.(MD)No.19 of 2013 & M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 R.T.(MD)No.1/2013 1.Katturaja 2.Vettum Perumal @ Krishnan, @ Kitchi ..Accused vs State, rep.by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Valliyoor Sub-Division, Nanguneri Sub-Division (i/c) Kalakkadu Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Cr.No.111/2007) .Complainant Referred Trial under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the judgment of the learned II-Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, made in S.C.No.59/2007, dated 26.12.2012. Crl.A.(MD)No.19/2013 1.Katturaja 2.Vettum Perumal @ Krishnan, @Kitchi ..Appellants/ Accused 1&2 . vs State, rep.by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Valliyoor Sub-Division, Nanguneri Sub-Division (i/c) Kalakkadu Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Cr.No.111/2007) .Respondent/ Complainant Crimina...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2013

Poonkothai Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Habeas Corpus Petition (Md.No.942 of 2013 Poonkothai ..Petitioner versus 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise (IX) Department, Fort St. Ceorge, Chennai - 9. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai District. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, calling for the entire records connected with the detention order of the second respondent in No.64/BDFGISSV/2013, dated 14.08.2013 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu by name Azhagar son of Raman aged about 34 years detained in Madurai Central Prison before this Court and set him at liberty fo...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2013

B.William Vs. Inspector of Police of E4 Abiramapuram Police Station

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 10/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI Crl.O.P.No.24092 of 2013 P-1 B.WILLIAM P-2 P.M.BASIL P-3 P.PONSWAMY P-4 J.MARY PUSHPAM P-5 P.M.BORIS P-6 P.ANNAPAZHAM P-7 A.YESURAJAN VS R-1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE E4 ABIRAMAPURAM POLICE STATION, ABIRAMAPURAM, CHENNAI ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the offence punishable under Sec.307, subsequently altered into 302 IPC, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.2. The petitioners are accused for offence under Sec.307, subsequently altered into 302 IPC. The case relates to murder of one Doctor S.B. Subbiah, a retired Neuro Surgeon from Government General Hospital, Chennai, who has subsequently joined as a consultant in a private hospital at Raja Annamalaipuram.3. According to the prosecution, the deceased was owning 2 acres of land in a village at Kanyakumari District and there is a property dispute subsisting between the deceased and one Ponnusamy ...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2013

Management of Erode District Vs. C.Kuttiappan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.A. NOS.1220 & 1221 OF2010& M.P.NOS.1 & 1 OF2010W.A. NO.1220 OF2010The Management of Erode District, Central Co-operative Bank, Bhavani Main Road, P.B.No.558, Erode 3. Rep.by its Special Officer .. Appellant Versus 1.C.Kuttiappan 2.L.S.Sengottaiyan 3.M.Sivasubramaniam 4.M.Manickam 5.A.Lakshmanan 6.S.Natarajan 7.S.Ranaganathan 8.P.Pattapah 9.C.Sengotaiah 10.P.Periyasamy 11.K.Natarajan 12.S.R.Gopal 13.T.S.Velusamy 14.S.A.Dhandapani 15.Tmt.Chinnammal 16.The Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Joint Commissioner, Coimbatore. 17.The Controlling Authority, Under PG Act 1972 / Asst. Commissioner of Labour, Salem 7. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order of the learned single Judge dated 25.11.2009 in W.P.No.2069 of 2005. For Appellant : Shri...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2013

Kavitha Vs. S.Padmanaban

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 10.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.3004 of 2009 1.Kavitha 2.Makesh 3.Minor.Logesh ... Appellants (3rd appellant rep.by his mother natural guardian and next friend 1st appellant Kavitha) Vs. 1.S.Padmanaban 2.The Managing Director M.G.R.Transport Ltd., Kanchipuram ... Respondents (R1-ex part) PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 02.03.2007, made in M.C.O.P.No.198 of 2002, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court, Fast Track Court No.II, Chennai. For Appellants : Mr.N.M.Elumalai For Respondents : Mr.S.Sairaman for R2 R1-Ex parte - - - JUDGMENT The appellants / claimants have preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 02.03.2007, made in M.C.O.P.No.198 of 2002, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court, Fast Track Court No.II,...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2013

V.T.Mahendran Vs. Director of Collegiate Education

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 10.2013 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Writ Petition No.15996 of 2011 V.T.Mahendran .. Petitioner Vs 1. The Director of Collegiate Education, College Road, Chennai-6.2. The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Chennai Zone, Saidapet, Chennai-15.3. Gurunanak College rep. by Secretary and Correspondent, Velacherry Main Road, Chennai-42.4. D.Umarani ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Proceedings in No.GNC/A3/NTS/Appt. Compassionate Grounds/2010 of the 3rd respondent and to quash the same and Consequently, direct the respondents 1 to 3 to promote the petitioner as Junior Assistant in the 3rd respondent college w.e.f. 12.6.2009 and to grant the petitioner all service and monetary benefits including arrears together with DCRG and Pensionary benefits, within a time frame to be fixed by thi...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2013

Ahamed Khan Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Its

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.10.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Habeas Corpus Petition (Md.No.869 of 2013 Ahamed Khan ..Petitioner versus 1.State of Tamil Nadu rep by its Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XVI) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Office of the District Collector and District Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records, connected with the detention order of the respondent No.2 in Cr.M.P.No.19/F.O./2013, dated 30.07.2013 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu, by namely Ahamed Khan, son of Naina Mohamed, aged about 49 years detained in Madurai Central Prison, before this court an...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2013

Elavarasan Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 10-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN C.R.P. (NPD) Nos. 3711, 3712, 3713, 3714, 3798, 3799, 3800, 3801, 3802, 3803, 3804, 3805 and 3806 of 2011 and M.P. No.1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 and 1 of 2012 Elavarasan @ Sivagnanaprakasam .. Petitioner in CRP No.3711 Versus The Secretary Neyveli Lignite Corporation Neyveli Cuddalore District .. Respondent in CRP No.3711 CRP (NPD) No.3711 of 2011:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of The Constitution of India praying to set aside the order dated 21.06.2011 passed in I.A. No.221 of 2010 in LAOP No.1656 of 2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Neyveli. For Petitioner : Mr. R. Margabandhu in all the Revision Petitions For Respondent : Mr. N.A.K. Sharma in all the Revision Petitions COMMON ORDER All these Civil Revision Petitions have been filed questioning the correctness of the order dated 21.06.2011 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Neyveli, whereby the applications...

Tag this Judgment!

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial