Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs. 1. P.Rajakumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA C.M.A.(MD).No.770 of 2012 and Cross Objection (MD) No.2 of 2013 C.M.A.(MD) No.770 of 2012 M/s Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., rep.by its Regional Manager 80 Feet Road, Anna Nagar Madura020. ... Appellant vs 1. P.Rajakumar 2. S.Velmurugan ... Respondents Memorandum of Grounds of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the fair and decretal order dated 14.10.2011 made in M.C.O.P.No.954 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Madurai. !For Appellant ... Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan ^For Respondents... Mr.K.Kumaravel for R1 Mr.B.Jeyakumar for R2 Cross.Obj.(MD) No.2 of 2013 P.Rajakumar .. Cross Appellant vs 1. M/s The Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., rep.by its Regional Manager 80 Feet Road, Anna Nagar Madurai 2. S.Velmurugan .. Respondents Memorandum of Grounds of Cross Appeal under Order 41, R...
State Rep. by Vs. 1.Rajamani,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD).No.11 of 2007 State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Uthumalai Police Station, Tirunelveli District. .. Appellant vs. 1.Rajamani, 2.Rajaiah Nadar 3.Thangadurai. .. Respondents Criminal appeal is filed under Section 378 of Criminal Procedure Code to allow this appeal and set aside the judgment of acquittal passed by the Honurable lower Court in S.C.No.120/2005, dated 23.01.2006 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, convict the respondents/accused for the offences as charged, pass sentence against them in accordance with law. !For appellant ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor ^For respondents... Mr.V.Kathirvelu Senior Counsel for Mr.K.Prabhu :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) This is an appeal against acquittal. The State is the appellant. The responde...
Owners Partners Vessel Shbdharti Vs. Seahorse Marine Engineering Pltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA A.No.4265 of 2012 in C.S.No.504 of 2012 Owners Partners Vessel SHBDharti vs. Seahorse Marine Engineering PLtd FOR PETITIONER : Krishna FOR RESPONDENT : notgiven ORDER: VINOD K. SHARMA, J.This application under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act has been moved to refer the dispute raised in the suit for arbitration, in terms of the Dispute Resolution clause in the Work Order dated 15.02.2011.2. The plaintiff/non applicant has filed a suit under Order XLII Rule 1 and 2 of the Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC, for recovery of a sum of Rs.32,09,760/- (Rupees thirty two lakhs nine thousand seven hundred and sixty only), i.e. Rs.29,72,000/- (Rupees twenty nine lakhs seventy two thousand only) towards principal and Rs.2,37,760/- (Rupees two lakhs thirty seven thousand seven hundred and sixty only) with...
V.M.Saineesa Vs. S.Shanthi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. . 01 .2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.286 of 2011 & M.P.No.1 of 2011 V.M.Saineesa .. Appellant -Vs- 1.S.Shanthi 2.The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Building Chenna003. 3.The Chairman Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore Chenna008. .. Respondents Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the decree of the Lower Appellate Court dated 06.07.2010 made in A.S.No.68 of 2008 on the file of V Addl. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai confirming the decree of the Trial Court in O.S.No.2612 of 2003 dated 25.07.2007 on the file of III Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For appellant : Mr.Ashok Rajaraman For Respondent : Mr.R.Manickavel for R1 ----- JUDGMENT The plaintiff in the original suit is the appellant in the second appeal. She filed the suit O.S.No.2612 of 2003 on the file of the III Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai:1) for recovery o...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Vs. 1. Jayanthi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.901 of 2003 & C.M.P(MD).No.6554 of 2003 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Trichy. ... Appellant Vs.1. Jayanthi 2. Minor Durga aged 4 years, 3. Minor Anjali, aged 2 years, Minors are rep. by mother and next friend first respondent all at Serukadambur, Koilramapuram, Thiruvidaimaruthur Taluk, 4. G.Umarani, ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the award and decree dated 20.06.2002 made in M.C.O.P.No.60 of 2000, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional Sub-Judge, Kumbakonam. !For Appellant ... Mr.P.Ramani ^For Respondents... Mr.M.Vinoth Singh Mishra for R-1 to R-3 No appearance for R-4 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.60 of 2000, on the file of the Motor Accidents C...
Peer Moideen Vs. General Manager of Food Corporation of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.Nos.770 and 19159 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2011 and Contempt Petition No.772 of 2012 Peer Moideen Partner M/s.S.P.Transport .. Petitioner in W.P.770/2011 and Cont.Petition.No.772/2012 M/s.S.P.Transport Rep. By Partner, Peer Moideen .. Petitioner in W.P.19159/2011 -vs- 1.The General Manager (TNR) RO-Chennai,Food Corporation of India No.5/54, Greams Road Chennai-602. Area Manager Food Corporation of India District Office, No.1, Bharathi Road Cuddalore-1 .. Respondents in both the Writ Petitions 3.Thulasi Das The General Manager (TNR) RO-Chennai,Food Corporation of Chennai 5/54, Greams Road, Chennai-6 4.Kannan The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India District Office, 1, Bharathi Road, Cuddalore .. Respondents 1 & 2 in Cont.P.No.772/2012 Prayer in W.P.770/2011 :-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamu...
K. Vijaya Prasad Vs. the Union of India, Rep. by Its Secretary, Minist ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
V. Periya Karuppiah-Judicial Member: 1. This application has been filed for grant of disability pension to the applicant from the date of entitlement with all consequential benefits after setting aside the proceedings of the first respondent in discharging the services of the applicant from the respondent department with effect from 16.09.1993 and to declare that the proceedings of MoD Letter No.7 (2659)/99/D (Pen A and AC) dated 14.8.2000 and MoD Letter No.2 (219)/93/D (Pen-C) dated 2.12.1996 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Pension Regulation for the Army, 1961 and violative of the Articles 14 and 20(1) of the Constitution of India with interest at 12% per annum. 2. The case of the applicant as stated in the application would be that the applicant hailed from a poor Dalit family in Gantasalapalem Village, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh and he studied upto XII standard and he was selected for NDA through UPSC in 1987. He joined NDA and studied there for 3 yea...
Sri Balaji Cylinders Pltd Vs. Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :28.01.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.26681 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 The Management of Sri Balaji Cylinders (P) Ltd., M.G.R. Road, Palavakkam Madras 041. Rep. by its Director. ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Tamil Nadu Chennai 104. 2.Sri Balaji Cylinders Employees' Union. Rep. by its Secretary, No.161, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai 001. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 1st respondent dated 25.08.2012 in M.A.No.194 of 2011 in I.D.No.52 of 1993 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ravindran For M/s.T.S.Gopalan and Co. For 2nd Respondent : M/s.R.Jaikumar For M/s.T.Fennwalter Associates O R D E R In this writ petition, the petitioner is a Management. They are seeking to set aside the order passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Tamil Nadu in M.A.No.194 of 2011 in I.D....
R.S.Babu Rao Vs. Air India Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated :28. 1.2013 Coram : The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice R.KARUPPIAH Writ Petition No.14371 of 2012 and MP.No.1 of 2012 R.S.Babu Rao .. Petitioner Vs 1.Air India Limited, rep.by its Chairman & Managing director, Airlines House No.113, Gurudwara Rakabganj Road, New Delhi-110001. 2.The Executive Director, Southern Region Office, Air India Limited, Airlines House, Meenambakkam, Chennai-27. .. Respondents PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of the first respondent in reference not RO/CMD/12/23 dated -nil- received on 22.5.2012, quash the same and consequently forbearing the respondents or their men or agents or subordinates or any person acting on their behalf from taking any action against the petitioner herein in respect of the community certificate furnished by the petit...
Jegajothi Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1539 of 2012 Jegajothi .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Madhukkoor Police Station, Thanjavur District. 3.Vinothkumar .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the body of the petitioner's daugher, Vaishali, aged 19 years old, before this Court and set her at liberty. !For petitioner ... Mr.P.Santhanakrishnan ^For respondents 1 and 2... Mr.R.Ramachandran, Additional Public Prosecutor :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the detenue had been secured and therefore, he is not pressing the present Habeas Corpus Petition. He had also made an endorsement to that effect...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »