Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Arumugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:29. 01.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Writ Petition Nos.25699, 25882, 25889, 25890, 31749, 24817 to 24820, 23753, 23754 , 25824 to 25826, 26005 to 26010, 26193 to 26197, 24793, 24918, 24919, 24917, 25591 to 25594, 27809 to 27834, 28051, 26980, 26467 to 26479, 31934, 25089, 26870, 30542, 25993, 27055 to 27059, 26440, 26441, 27746, 27792, 28530, 28800, 30305, 33951, 25972, 27846, 23528, 23529, 26811, 31066, 31067, 25708, 26047 to 26051, 26076 to 26079, 26080 to 26084, 26134 to 26137, 26138 to 26142, 26171, 26172 of 2012 and W.P.No.491 of 2013, 25343, 25950 to 25952, 26487, 26504, 24187 to 24189, 31020, 26088, 26089,27758, 26342, 24473, 24866, 25173, 25386, 28175, 28176, 29028, 26932, 26851, 27358, 27558, 27700, 28445, 29574, 29630, 34058, 34489 of 2012, W.P.Nos.922, 1126, 1127, 1016 and 1260 of 2013 and W.P.(MD)Nos.12871 and 12273 of 2012 & Connected Miscellaneous Peti...
P.Mala Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU HABEAS CORPUS PETITION (MD) No.42 of 2013 P.Mala .. Petitioner vs 1.The Commissioner of Police, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station - Town, Madurai District. 3.N.Chitra Kala 4.Kannapiran, S/o.Baluchamy ... Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the detenu, Prabu, aged about 33 years, before this Court and setting him at liberty. !For Petitioner ... Ms.A.Rajini ^For Respondents ... Mr.R.Ramachandran, 1 and 2 Addl.Public prosecutor. For Respondent-3 ... Mr.R.Sundar :ORDER (Order of the Court was made byA M.JAICHANDREN,J) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the 1st and th...
S.Rani Vs. A.Gnanaprakasam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU A.S.No.663 of 2009 S. Rani .. Defendant/Appellant vs. A. Gnanaprakasam .. Respondent/Plaintiff Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree passed by the Learned Principal District Judge, Cuddalore in O.S.No.124 of 2007 dated 23.12.2008. For Appellant ... Mr. S.K. Rakhunathan For Respondents ... Mrs. Hema Sampath Senior Counsel for Mrs. R. Meenal JUDGMENT The following are the averments contained in the plaint filed in O.S.No.124 of 2007:1. (a) The defendant is absolute owner of the schedule mentioned property, that on 1.12.2004 he executed an agreement to sell the suit property to the plaintiff for a total value of Rs.6 lakhs, that the said agreement was registered at the office of the Sub-Registrar, Panrutti and the plaintiff had paid the defendant, a sum of Rs.5 lakhs as advance and had to pay the remaining Rs.1,00,000/- within...
Thangapandi, S/O.Pitcha Vs. the State, Through the
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29/01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD) No.306 of 2006 and Criminal Appeal (MD) No.465 of 2006 and Crl.Rc.(MD)No.640 of 2006 Thangapandi, S/o.Pitchai ... Appellant in Crl.A.(MD)No.306/ 2006/Accused No.2 Jeeva, W/o.Rajendran ... Appellant in Crl.A.(MD)No.465/ 2006/Accused No.1/ Respondent-1 in Crl.RC.(MD)640/2006 P.Rajammal, W/o.Pandiya Rajan (Late) ... Petitioner in Crl.RC(MD)640/2006/ P.W.2 vs. The State, through the Inspector of Police, Battalagundu Police Station, Dindigul District. (Cr.No.491/2003) ... Respondent/ Complainant in both the Appeals & Respondent-2 in Crl.RC(MD)640/2006 Crl.A.(MD)No.306/2006: Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 16.05.2006, in S.C.No.90 of 2005 on the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Dindigul. Crl.A.(MD)N...
S.Ramya Devi Vs. D.Madhankumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Crl.O.P. No.37007 of 2007 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2007 and 1 of 2008 S.Ramya Devi .. Petitioner/Accused Vs. D.Madhankumar .. Respondent/Complainant Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records in C.C.No.6066 of 2007 on the file of the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Kumar Talrejaa For Respondent : Mr.R.Lakshmi Narasimhan ***** O R D E R The petition has been filed to quash the proceedings pending against him in C.C.No.6066 of 2007 on the file of the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.2. The facts of the case are as follows: The marriage of the petitioner and the respondent has taken place on 12.9.2003 as per the Hindu Rites and Customs and out of the said wedlock, the petitioner gave birth to a female child on 3.11.2004. Thereafter, due to some difference o...
Sheela Foam Pltd Vs. Assistant Commissioner Ct
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.No.2056 of 2013 M/s Sheela Foam (P) Ltd., rep.by its Head of Department Legal Manufacturers Polyurethane Foam SIPCOT Industrial Growth Centre Perundurai, Erode District .. Petitioner -vs- The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Perundurai Erode District .. Respondent Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN.33292925161/2012-2013, quash the proceedings dated 07.01.2013 issued therein. For Petitioner :: Mr.Chandran Karuppiah for Mr.B.Raveendran For Respondent :: Mr.Aditya Reddy Government Advocate (Taxes) ORDER The writ petition has been filed primarily challenging that portion of the notice calling upon the petitioner to pay the differential value added tax within seven days of receipt of the notice, failing which recovery proceedings would be taken as per law...
New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs. 1. S.Vivek
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.1736 of 2010 & M.P.No.4 of 2010 New India Assurance Company Limited, Bagalur Mansion, II Floor, Doddapet, Kolar. ... Appellant Vs.1. S.Vivek 2. Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Salem.3. C.G.Shamalakumari ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the award dated 29.06.2009 and made in M.C.O.P.No.1914 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, III Additional Sub Court, Trichy. !For Appellant ... Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian ^For Respondents... Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj for R-1 Mr.M.Prakash for R-2 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / third respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.1914 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, III Additional Sub Court, Trichy.2. The short facts of the case are as...
M.Samuel Sekar Vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.9546 of 2012 M.Samuel Sekar .. Petitioner Vs.1. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., (Formerly Thanti Periyar Transport Corporation Ltd.,) Rep.by its Managing Director Villupura602. 2. State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Secretary Transport Department Fort St.George, Chennai-9. .. Respondents Prayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the action of the first respondent in not offering suitable alternate employment to the petitioner with effect from 16.10.1998 i.e. the date of discharge from service by an order dated 15.9.1998 is illegal nad constrary to the provisions of the 1995 Act arbitrary violative of Articl16. and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to provide the petitioner alternate employment commensurate with status with effect from 16.10.1998 conseq...
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Jeyadevi.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS C.M.A.(MD) No.366 of 2010 & M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2010 & Cross Objection (MD) No.27 of 2010 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office - III, Sitalakshmi Complex, Thirunagar, Madurai. ... Appellant/1st respondent in the Cross Obj. Vs. 1.Jeyadevi ...1st respondent/ Cross Objector 2.M/s.Shri Kanniga Parameswari Mills (P) Ltd., Through its Proprietor SIDCO Industry, No.59, Kuthiyar Kundu Post Madurai 3. Ponnammal ... 2nd & 3rd Respondents/ 2nd & 3rd Respondents PRAYER in the C.M.A and the Cross Obj. Appeal and the Cross Objection against the fair and decreetal order dated 07.11.2009 made in M.C.O.P. No.1126 of 2004 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District and Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court), Dindigul. !For Appellant/ 1st respondent in the Cross Obj. ... Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai ^For Respondent -...
S.Ramesh Vs. Chief Engineer Tangedco
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 29 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.32259 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 and 2 of 2012 S.Ramesh .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Engineer (Personnel), Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., No.144, Anna Salai, Chenna002. 2.The Superintending Engineer, Thirupatthur Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO Ltd., Thirupatthur. .. Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for issuance of Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the entire records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the first and the second respondents vide letter No.092449/865/G.33.G.331/2012, dated 22.10.2012 and Memo No.009888-684/NEPE.1/NEU/2/2012, dated 14.11.2012 respectively and the consequential order of reversion reverting the petitioner to the post of Commercial Inspector passed by the second respondent vide memo not KU.No.389/NIP2/NIU/KO.TANI/2012, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »