Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ma Nithyananda Ekavathi Vs. Srinath Sridevan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:30. 01-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA C.S.No.579 of 2012 and Application Nos.4998 and 4773 o1. MA NITHYANANDA EKAVATHI [ PETITIONER ] ADVOCATE D/O.MR.V.CHANDRAHASAN NO.92 PILLAIYAR KOIL ST VADAPALANI CHENNAI 2 Vs 1 SRINATH SRIDEVAN [ RESPONDENTS ] ADVOCATE HSB PARTNERS SHREYAS VIRAAT 2 D FLOOR 2 (OLD NO.13/14) 3RD CROSS ROAD R.A.PURAM CHENNAI 2 2 MR.HARISANKAR ADVOCATE NO.70 ADDITIONAL LAW CHAMBERS HIGH COURT BUILDINGS CHENNAI 3 M/S. SUDARSHANA SUNDAR ADVOCATE NATARAJ NIVAS 2 D FLOOR 8 12 BALASUBRAMANIAM ST MYLAPORE CHENNAI 4 MR.M.LAXMAN MR.M.MURUGANPPAN NO.21 K.B.DASAN ROAD ALWARPET CHENANI 1 5 MR.AR.L.SUNDARESAN SENIOR COUNSEL 24 ADDL LAW CHAMBERS HIGH COURT MADRAS 6 MR.RAMU MURUGAPPAN NO.48 K.B.DASAN ROAD ALWARPET CHENNAI 1 7 MRS.L.ANNAPURANI NO.21 K.B.DASAN ROAD ALWARPET CHENNAI 1 8 MR.L.RAM LAXMAN S/O.MR.M.LAXMAN NO.21 K.B.DASAN ROAD ALWARPET CHENNAI 1 9 MR.M.SUNDAR ADVOCATE 45 NEW ADDL LAW CHAMBERS CHENNAI HIG...
The Assistant Commissioner of the Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Income Tax, C ...
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
PER BENCH These three appeals i.e. I.T.A. No. 900/Mds/2010 filed by the Revenue and I.T.A. Nos. 905 and 906/Mds/2010 filed at the behest of the assessee, arise from a common order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Tiruchirappalli dated 23.03.2010 in ITA No. 310/07-08 and 254/04-05 for the assessment year 2002-03 in proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961 [in short the "Act"]. The appeals pertain to same assessment year. So they are being adjudicated upon together. We clarify that the Assessing Officer had passed assessment order under section 143(3) of the "Act" on 18.08.2004 making some additions. The assessee challenged those additions before the CIT(A) in ITA No. 254/04-05. Similarly, the Assessing Officer passed another order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 on 31.12.2007. The assessee preferred another appeal No. ITA No. 310/07-08 by challenging the additions made therein. Since, the CIT(A) vide common order has decided both the above appea...
M/S.United India Insurance Company Limited, Vs. 1. S.Antony James
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.94 of 2004 & C.M.P.(MD)No.677 of 2004 M/s.United India Insurance Company Limited, Madurai. ... Appellant Vs.1. S.Antony James 2. S.George Meichael, 3. S.Rosalin Grace Mary 4. S.Jeyam Jeyaseeli 5. S.Antonyraj 6. Laurence Thiyagu 7. S.Gnanasekaran (Ex-parte in the lower Court) 8. The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation, Divisional Office-1, Madras. ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree dated 20.01.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.140 of 1998, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Tiruchirappalli. !For Appellant ... Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai ^For Respondents... Mr.S.Gopalamanikandan for R-1 to R-6 Mr.D.Sivaraman for R-3 R-7 exparte - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the prese...
Mahendra Kumar Bhaiya Vs. the Chairman Cmwssb
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 1.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.Nos.6539, 17466, 17475, 24725 and 27095 of 2005; 28482 and 35202 of 2007; 3796, 4069, 4154, 7629 and 12163 of 2009; 2265, 2266, 3207, 4706, 6106, 6566, 6785, 8972, 16378, 18188 to 18191 and 18926 of 2010; 3201 and 16733 of 2011 and connected miscellaneous petitions W.P.No.6539 of 2005:- Mahendra Kumar Bhaiya No.42, Godown Street, Chennai-600 001. ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Chairman, C.M.W.S.S.B., No.1, Pumping Station Road, Chintadripet, Chennai-600 002. 2.The Senior Accounts Officer VII, Area VII, C.M.W.S.S.B., No.25, Satyamurthi Road, Chetpet, Chenna031. ... Respondents W.P.No.6539 of 2005 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records and quash the demand made in the impugned letter dated 03.02.2005 issued by the second respondent in respect of premises bearing door No.286/22, Puruswalkam High Road,...
Kumaragiri Textiles Vs. Presiding Officer of Labour Court at Salem
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.18582 of 2003 Kumaragiri Textiles P.M.P.Nagar, Thokkampatti Post, Dharmapur705. ... Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem. 2.T.Paramasivam ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the order of the first respondent in I.A.No.170 and 171 of 2003 in I.D.No.251 of 1999 dated 23.06.2003, quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to allow the said applications and permit the petitioner to let in evidence and file additional counter statements. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondents : No appearance O R D E R Heard Mr.R.Parthiban, learned counsel for the petitioner. Though the second respondent has entered appearance through counsel, there was no representation on behalf of the second respondent for the past three occasi...
P.Raju Vs. U.Ram Babu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 01-2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN Criminal Revision Case No. 1745 of 2011 and M.P. No. 1 of 2011 P. Raju .. Petitioner Versus U. Ram Babu .. Respondent Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 02.06.2011 passed in M.P. No. 1642 of 2010 in unnumbered C.C. No. of 2010 on the file of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr. A.A. Lawrence For Respondent : Mr. P. Kumaresan for Mr. C.V. Kumar ORDER The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused in unnumbered C.C. No. 2010 filed by the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, has come forward with this Criminal Revision Case challenging the order dated 02.06.2011 passed in M.P. No. 1642 of 2010 by the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, by which the petition filed by the respondent, for condoning the delay of 67 days in filing the complaint, wa...
J.Akila Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.24690 of 2012 J.Akila .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chenna009. 2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 6. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagapattinam District, Nagapattinam. 4.The District Educational Officer, Mayiladuthurai, Nagapattinam District. 5.The Secretary, Hameediya Higher Secondary School, Thirukalacheri, Tharangambadi Taluk, Nagapattinam District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus as stated therein. For Petitioner : Ms.E.Ranganayaki For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.Digvijay Pandian, AGP For R5 : Mr.P.Ganesan for M/s.C.S.Associates O R D E R The petitioner seeks for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to consider the appeal made by the petitioner date...
Arumugam Vs. Ramachandran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.24 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 Arumugam .. Appellant -Vs- Ramachandarn .. Respondent Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 03.12.2011 in the A.S.No.183 of 2010 on the file of the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Villupuram confirming the judgment and decree dated 01.09.2009 passed in O.S.No.362 of 2007 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif, Ulundurpet. For appellant : Mr. J.R.K.Bhavanantham ----- JUDGMENT The defendant in the original suit is the appellant in the second appeal. The respondent herein, as plaintiff, filed O.S.No.362 of 2007 for the recovery of a sum of Rs.1,04,734/- rounded to Rs.1,00,000/- consisting of Rs.85,000/- as principal component and Rs.19,734/- as interest component calculated at the rate of 9% p.a based on a promissory note from the date of lending till the date of filing of the ...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Mrs.Padmini
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 01.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR C.M.A.No.3638 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Branch, Uthagai, Nilgiri District. ... Appellant ..Vs.. 1.Mrs. Padmini 2.Assistant Manager, Devarsola Estate, Thaisola Plantations (P) Ltd., Devarsol207. Nilgiris District. ... Respondents Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 against the order in W.C.No.3 of 2008, dated 29.07.2011 on the file of Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Coonoor. For Appellant : Mr.M.B.Gopalan For Respondents : Mr.Balan Haridas Challenge in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is to the finding fastening liability on the appellant Insurance company to pay compensation of Rs.1,32,121/- for the death of one Mr.Prahaladan, a Night Watchman in Devarshola Estate, Thasishola Plantation Pvt. Ltd., Devarshola, Nilgiris District.2. As per th...
Sri Vinayaga Agencies Vs. Assistant Commissioner Ct
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.Nos.2036 to 2038 of 2013 Sri Vinayaga Agencies No.4/4B, Nergundram Pathai 100 Feet Road Vadapalani Chennai .. Petitioner in all the writ petitions -vs- 1. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Vadapalani-I Assessment Circle Chenna106. 2. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Palayamkottai Assessment Circle Palayamkottai .. Respondents in all the writ petitions Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned orders in TIN No.33251463587, for the assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 respectively, dated 11.01.2013 received on 18.01.2013 on the files of the first respondent herein, quash the same. For Petitioner :: Mrs.Aparana Nandakumar For Respondents :: Mr.Manohar Sundaram Government Advocate (Taxes) ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »