Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Sambath Vs. Superintendent Engineeri
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :02. 01-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR W.P.No.17691 of 2009 K. Sambath @ Chidambaranathan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent Engineer-I, Puducherry Electricity Board, Uppalam, Puducherry.2. The Junior Engineer, Electricity Board, Vadhanoor, Puducherry.3. The Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Puducherry. .. Respondents (R-3 impleaded as per order of this Court dated 4.12.2012 in M.P.No.1 of 2012) PRAYER : This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation for the death of his wife, which was caused by electrocution due to negligence of the respondents. For Petitioner : Ms.S.Rajeni Ramadass For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.A.Tamilvanan, Government Advocate (Puducherry) O R D E R The prayer in the writ petition is to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the...
M.Ali Baba (Died) Vs. Selvam Thaol Metha (Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.782 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 M.Ali Baba (died) 1.Rabikka Banu 2.Minor Samsu Alam 3.Minor Ansari 4.Minor Soibu 5.Minor Shyer Nisha 6.Minor Mohamed Rafiq 7.Minor Mohamed Sabukhan (Petitioners 2 to 7 are minors and they are rep.by the mother and natural guardian Rabikka Babu 1st petitioner). .. Petitioners Vs Selvam Thaol Metha (died) 1.William Thal Metha 2.Henri Thal Metha 3.Gurusamy 4.Rajendran 5.Kanagavel 6.Sundara Vadivelu 7.Seldan Thal Metha 8.Johnson 9.Ranjan 10.Anandan 11.Karunakaran 12.Mahiban 13.Darwin 14.Premarathi 15.Poonkodi 16.Thangarani 17.Jayaseeli (Respondents 3 to 17 are exparte in Lower Court and they are given up in the CRP.) .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order dated 24.02.2012 made in I.A.No.53 of 2012 in O.S.No.17 of 2002 on the file of the District Munsif Cou...
Mahaveer Finance India Ltd Vs. K.Pandurangan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:2. 1.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)No.4160 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 M/s.Mahaveer Finance India Ltd., rep by its Director, No.151, Mount Road, Chenna002. Petitioner vs. Mr.K.Pandurangan Respondent Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 21.8.2012 in I.A.No.11528 of 2011 in O.S.No.3772 of 2011 passed by the VII City Civil Court, Chennai. For petitioner : Mr.Y.Jyothish Chander For respondent : Mr.T.K.S.Gandhi ORDER Defendant in O.S.No.3772 of 2011 on the file of the VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai is the revision petitioner.2. Respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for declaration declaring that the seizure of the plaintiff's vehicle bearing registration number TN-22-A4260 by the defendant/revision petitioner is illegal, null and void and for mandatory injunction directing the revision petitioner to return the said vehicle in good running condition. In that suit, the revision petitioner fi...
Annajothi Vs. S.Jainston Sigamony
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:2. 1.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)Nos.2410 and 2411 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 to 7 o1. Annajothi 2. H.Selvin Kanaga Rose 3. P.Cyril Raj 4. T.Samuvel Raj 5. P.Johnson 6. A.Wiselin Jayakumar 7. R.John Leeban 8. Suguna Bai (Petitioners 2 to 8 impleaded as party petitioners vide order of the court dated 17.7.2012 in M.P.No.1 of 2012 in CRP PD No.2410 of 2012 and M.P.No.3 of 2012 in CRP PD No.2411 of 2012) Petitioners vs.1. S.Jainston Sigamony 2. The Bishop, Kanyakumari CSI Diocese, No.1, Dennison Street, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.3. The General Secretary, Church of South India, No.5, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chenna014. 4. The Moderator, Church of South India, No.5, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chenna014. Respondents Civil Revision Petition No.2410 of 2012 is to strike down the plaint in O.S.No.3597 of 2012 on the file of the XVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. Civil Revision Petition No.2411 of 2012 is a...
M.P.Jayasekar Vs. R.Robinson
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:2. 1.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)No.2387 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 M.P.Jayasekar Petitioner vs.1. R.Robinson 2. V.Stanley 3. R.Rajadhas Convenor, Commissioner for Settlement of Election, C.S.I.Kanyakumari Diocese, 71, Dennis Street, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.4. M.T.Jegan, Paster CSI Church, Thottavaram, Moovathumugam Post, Athoor Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.5. The Bishop, rep. C.S.I. Kanyakumari Diocese, 71, Dennis Street, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.6. The Moderator, Church of South India, No.5, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chenna014. Respondents Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 20.6.2012 in I.A.No.8689 of 2012 in O.S.No.3604 of 2012 passed by the XVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For petitioner : Mr.J.Ramakrishnan For R1 : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For RR 5 and 6 : Mr.A.R.Nixon For RR 2 and 4 : Mr.S.Conscious Ilango ORDER First defendant in O.S.No.3604 o...
Nagaraj Vs. the Director,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD)No.602 of 2009 and C.M.A(MD)No.692 of 2008 Nagaraj .. Appellant in C.M.A.No.602 of 2009 and 1st respondent in C.M.A.No.692 of 2008 The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Railway Feeder Road, Swathi Complex, Virudhunagar .. Appellant in C.M.A.No.692 of 2008 and 2nd respondent in C.M.A.No.602 of 2009 vs The Director, M/s.Single Widow Securities Limited, 1680/31, Ramani Regency, Trichy Road, S.N.Puram, Coimbatore - 45. .. Both Respondents in C.M.A.No.602 of 2009 and C.M.A.No.692 of 2008 COMMAN PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the order and degree in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.52 of 2006 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court, Fast Track Court, Virudhunagar, dated 12.02.2007. !For Appellant ... Mr.A.Sivaj C.M.A.No.602 of 2008 and C.M.A.No.692 of 2009 ^For Respondent ... Mr...
New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs. 1.Thiru.S.P.Kandasamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.1756 of 2010 New India Assurance Company Limited, 11-19, 20 Government Arts College Road, Coimbatore - 18. ... Appellant vs 1.Thiru.S.P.Kandasamy 2.Nithiya Associates .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act 1923, against the order dated 31.05.2010, passed in W.C.No.223 of 2007, on the file of the Workmen Compensation Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Dindigul. !For Appellant ... Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian ^For Respondent ... Mr.B.Saravanan for R1 Mr.P.Chandra Bose for R2 :JUDGMENT The appellant/2nd respondent has preferred the present appeal in CMA(MD).No.1756 of 2010, against the order passed in W.C.No.223 of 2007, on the file of the Workmen Compensation Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Dindigul.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioner, who is the son of the deceased P...
Sago Serve Vs. Muthuselvi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:2. 1.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)No.3682 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 The Managing Director and Special Officer, Sago Serve, Jagirammapalayam, Omalur Main Road, Salem. Petitioner vs. Muthuselvi Respondent Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 7.9.2012 in I.A.No.1231 of 2012 in O.S.No.755 of 2012 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Salem. For petitioner : Mr.Aravind Pandian, Additional Advocate General for M/s.L.P.Shanmuga Sundaram For respondent : Mr.A.V.Arun ORDER Defendant is the revision petitioner.2. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for an order of injunction restraining the revision petitioner from selling or taking any effort to sell the products lying at its his office for a period of six months and in that suit, the revision petitioner filed application in I.A.No.1231 of 2012 to reject the plaint stating that City Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit having rega...
M.Hakeem Maidheen Vs. G.Murugesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1936 of 2012 and M.P(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2012 M.Hakeem Maidheen ... Petitioner/Respondent/ Respondent Vs. G.Murugesan ... Respondent/Petitioner/ Petitioner Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order of delivery passed by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Rent Controller, Madurai, in E.P.No.136 of 2010 in R.C.O.P.No.232 of 2009, dated 21.07.2012. !For Petitioner ... Mr.C.M.Arumugam ^For Respondent ... Mr.R.Subramanian * * * * * :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is focussed to get set aside the order of delivery passed by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Rent Controller, Madurai, in E.P.No.136 of 2010 in R.C.O.P.No.232 of 2009, dated 21.07.2012.2. Heard both sides.3. The epitome and the long and short of the relevant facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this Civil Revision ...
Dr.Vasanthakumari Vs. 1.Vinoth
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.720 of 2005 Dr.Vasanthakumari ... Appellant vs 1.Vinoth 2.R.Biju 3.The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Anguvilas Building, North Car Street, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, to enhance the award amount made by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District, dated 18.08.2004, made in M.C.O.P.No.6 of 2001, to the restricted claim of Rs.7,00,000/-. !For Appellant ... Mr.M.S.Jawaharlal ^For Respondent ... Mr.K.C.Peter Kanish Kumar for R2 M/s.Uma Ramanathan for R3 R1-Given up :JUDGMENT The appellant/claimant has filed a claim case in M.C.O.P.No.6 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District, against the respondents, stating that on 14.01.1998, ...