Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Thomas Vs. P.Sivasubramaniam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED:03. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR C.M.A.No.3290 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Thomas ... Appellant Vs. 1.P.Sivasubramaniam 2.G.Velumani 3.United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office IV, Door No.1940-B, Trichy Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbator045. 4.R.S. Creation Office at No.15, Kamaraj Nagar, 3rd Street, P.N.Road, Tiruppu602. 5.United India Insurance Company Ltd., No.280, Ooty Main Road, Mettupalaya301. ... Respondents [R1, R2 and R4 were set exparte] The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the award & Decree dated 01.12.2011 made in MCOP No.575 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Court, FTC No.1), Erode. For Appellant : Mr.Ma.P.Thangavel for M/s.M.Guruprasad JUDGMENT Though the appellant has sustained injures and assessed by PW2, Doctor, to have suffered 30% permanent disability, by fixing negligence on the appellant/...
M.Rajarathinam Vs. J.Babu Shanthi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.412 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 M.Rajarathinam .. Petitioner Vs J.Babu Shanthi .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, against the fair and decreetal order made in R.C.A.No.3 of 2008 dated 29.10.2011 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority / Principal Sub-Court, Madurai by confirming the fair and decreetal order made in R.C.O.P.No.31 of 2003 dated 20.12.2007 on the file of the Rent Controller / Additional District Munsif, Madurai. !For petitioner ... Mr.M.C.Swamy ^For respondent ... Mr.R.Manoharan :ORDER Compendiously and concisely, the germane facts which are absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition would run thus: The parties are referred to hereunder, as follows; the revision petitioner herein, M.Rajarathinam is referred to as the tenant and the...
Kaya Infraatech Projects Vs. Uco Bank
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:03. 01.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Writ Petition No.21344 of 2012 & M.P.No.1 of 2012 M/s.Kaya Infraatech Projects rep. by its Partner Mr.Renga Reddy .... Petitioner Vs. Authorised Officer, UCO Bank, Mid Corporate Unit, T.Nagar, No.67, Burkit Road, T.Nagar, Chenna017. .... Respondent PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records related to the impugned possession Notice dated 7.7.2012, issued by the respondent, invoking Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Vijay Narayanan, S.C. for M/s.Rathina Asohan For Respondent: Mr.V.Suthakar ---------- O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J.) The petitioner has come before this Court challenging t...
R.Maheswaran Vs. Managing Director Papsco
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :3. 1.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.31912 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 R.MAHESWARAN ... Petitioner Vs 1 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR PAPSCO (PUDUCHERRY AGRO PRODUCTS FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD.) PAPSCO AGRICULTURE COMPLEX THATTANCHAVADY PUDUCHERRY 009. 2 THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER PAPSCO (PUDUCHERRY AGRO PRODUCTS FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. ) PAPSCO AGRICULTURE COMPLEX THATTANCHAVADY PUDUCHERRY 60...
R.Ganapathy Vs. 1.M.Kamaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1784 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 R.Ganapathy .. Petitioner Vs 1.M.Kamaraj 2.Chithra .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.448 of 2012 in I.A.No.415 of 2012 in O.S.No.201 of 2012 dated 10.08.2012 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Aruppukottai. !For petitioner ... Mr.A.Abdulkadar for M/s.Eddy & Emboss Law Firm ^For respondents... Mr.C.M.Marichelliah Prabhu for R1 Mr.J.Bharathan for R2 :ORDER A resume of the germane facts which are absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition would run thus: The first respondent herein filed the suit in O.S.No.201 of 2012 seeking the following reliefs of permanent injunctions such as (i)restraining the first defendant from making any construction; (ii)not to issue any plan approval and also (iii)not...
Sri Vageesa Vidhyashram Vs. Spl. Officer of Private School Fee Determi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :03. 01.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN Writ Petition No.22776 of 2012 Sri Vageesa Vidhyashram rep. by its Correspondent, Melur Road, Srirangam, Tiruchirapall006. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Special Officer, Private School Fee Determination Committee, P.T.A. Building, D.P.I. Campus, Chennai-600 006. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai. 3.The Central Board of Secondary Education, rep. by its Chairman, Shiksha Kendra, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, New Delh092. .. Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ or Direction to call for the records on the file of the 1st Respondent in Proceedings NIL dated 27.5.2011 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction. For Petitioner : Mr.Raguvaran Gopalan For Respon...
1.Sivasamy Vs. Subramanian
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2678 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 o1. Sivasamy 2.Balasubramanian 3.Ganesan .. Petitioners Vs Subramanian .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., against the fair and decreetal order in I.A.No.836 of 2011 in O.S.No.103 of 2006 dated 19.10.2012 on the file of the Sub-Court, Pudukottai. !For petitioners... Mr.K.N.Govardhanan ^For respondent ... No appearance :ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioners. Despite printing the name of the respondent, there is no response from him. 2.The learned counsel for the revision petitioners / defendants 1 to 3, would echo the heart-burns of his clients to the effect that the I.A.No.836 of 2011 filed by the petitioners herein to get the delay of 149 days condoned in filing the I.A. to get set aside ex-parte decree under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC, was dismissed. The reason for the delay was jaundice of...
J.Anantha MercelIn Vs. M.Baraniraj Udaiyar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No. 2757 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 J.Anantha Mercelin ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Defendant Vs. M.Baraniraj Udaiyar ... Respondent/Respondent/ Plaintiff Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2012 in O.S.No.269 of 2010 dated 06.09.2012, on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli. !For Petitioner ... Mr.H.Arumugam ^ * * * * * :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 06.09.2012, passed in I.A.No.4 of 2012 in O.S.No.269 of 2010, by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.2. Heard the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner.3. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner would echo the cri de coeur and heart burns of his client to the effect that his client filed an application under Order VIII Rule 9 ...
1.K.Chithiraiselvam Vs. 1.C.Veerabathiran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2694 of 2012 and C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2695 o1. K.Chithiraiselvam 2.K.Adaikkan 3.K.Veeramahali @ Veeramani 4.Veerabathiran @ A.K.Gopalan .. Petitioners in both the CRPs. Vs 1.C.Veerabathiran 2.V.Adaikkan @ Chellakkannu 3.K.Chidambaram 4.K.Vellaiyammal 5.K.Alagar 6.M.Rajasekar 7.Minor M.Saroja represented through her brother and guardian M.Rajasekar 8.Minor M.Raja represented through her brother and guardian M.Rajasekar .. Respondents in CRP(MD) No.2694 o1. K.Chidambaram 2.K.Vellaiyammal 3.K.Alagar 4.M.Rajasekar 5.Minor M.Saroja represented through her brother and guardian M.Rajasekar 6.Minor M.Raja represented through her brother and guardian M.Rajasekar 7.C.Veerabathiran 8.V.Adaikkan @ Chellakkannu .. Respondents in CRP(MD) No.2695 of 2012 Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal orders passed on 06.11.2012 in I.A....
Ansari Vs. 1.M.Thavamani..
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2115 of 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012 Ansari ... Petitioner/1st Respondent/ Defendant Vs. 1.M.Thavamani ... 1st Respondent/Petitioner/ Plaintiff 2.Garnishee, The Sub Judge, Ramanathapuram. ... 2nd Respondent/ Garnishee Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 10.08.2012 passed in I.A.No.217 of 2012 in O.S.No.49 of 2012, on the file of the Sub Court, Ramanathapuram. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Pandian ^For Respondent ... Mr.K.Govindarajan for R.1 * * * * * :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 10.08.2012 passed in I.A.No.217 of 2012 in O.S.No.49 of 2012, on the file of the Sub Court, Ramanathapuram.2. Heard both sides.3. The epitome and the long and short of the relevant facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Civil ...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »