Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Mohammed Ismail Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.110 of 2013 A.Mohammed Ismail .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, Oddanchatram Police Station, Dindigul, Dindigul District. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2, particularly, the second respondent to produce the detenues or their body, namely, the petitioner's father Anwar Batcha, aged about 57 years, and the petitioner's younger brother Mohammed Ali, aged about 22 years, residence at 1025/4, Society Colony, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District, before this Court and set them at liberty forthwith. !For petitioner ... Mr.B.Jeyakumar ^For respondents ... Mr.R.Ramachandran, Additional Public Prosecutor :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J)...
S.Sivasankar Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1555 of 2012 S.Sivasankar .. Petitioner vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 9. 2.The District Magistrate and District Collector, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the Detention Order M.H.S.Confdl No.91/2012, dated 29.11.2012 passed by the second respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and quash the same and direct the respondent to produce the detenue Rajagopal, aged 28 years, S/o. Navaneethakrishnan at liberty. !For petitioner ... Mr.P.Mahendran ^For respondents ... Mr.C.Ramesh, Additional Public Prosecutor :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J) Today, when the Habeas Corpus Petition was taken u...
Abani Ranjan Bhuyan Vs. Chief of the Air Staff
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.2411 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 Abani Ranjan Bhuyan .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Chief of the Air Staff Air Headquarters, Vayu Bhavan New Delh011. 2. The Air Officer Commanding Air Force Record Office Subroto Park New Delh010. 3. The Air Officer Commanding No.23, Equipment Depot Air Force Station Avadi IAF Avadi Post Chenna055. .. Respondents Prayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records leading to the impugned order (Signal) not AFRO/RDB/458 Jan/03 dated 3.1.2013 passed by he 2nd respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 10th Jan 2013, pending before the 2nd respondent and not to post out the petitioner from the present unit till 12th June 2013 or the petitioner may be given discharge from service with immedia...
Venkatesh Vs. M.K.Udayakumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED:30. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR C.M.A.Nos.3391 of 2012 and 997 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 in CMA No. 997 of 2013 CMA No.3391 of 2012 ------------------- Venkatesh .. Appellant Vs. 1.M.K.Udayakumar 2.The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, Micro Office, No.212, SFS 407.1st 'A' Main Road, New Town, Yelahanka, Bangalor064. .. Respondents For Appellant : Mr.Mukund R.Pandiyan For Respondents : Mr.M.B.Gopalan (for R2) CMA No. 997 of 2013 ------------------- The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, Micro Office, No.212, SFS 407.1st 'A' Main Road, New Town, Yelahanka, Bangalor064. .. Appellant Vs.1. Venkatesh 2.M.K.Udayakumar .. Respondents For Appellant : Mr.M.B.Gopalan For Respondents : Mr.Mukund R.Pandiyan (for R1) Common Prayer : These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Decree and Judgment passed by the...
Donatus Tony Ikwanusi Vs. Investigating Officer Ncb
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR . JUSTICE K.N.BASHA THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.SUDANTHIRAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DEVADASS CRL.A.No.417 of 2012 Donatus Tony Ikwanusi .. Appellant Vs. The Investigating Officer, NCB, South Zonal Unit, Chennai 90. .. Respondent * * * Prayer : Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and under Section 36-B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, against the judgment made in C.C.No.11 of 2010 on the file of the learned Principal Special Judge for NDPS Act Cases, Chennai, dated 04.08.2011. * * * For Appellant : Mr.T.S.Sasikumar For Respondent : Mr.N.P.Kumar Special Public Prosecutor for NCB Cases Amicus Curiaes : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel Mr.A.Ganesh and Mr.C.R.Malarvannan K.N.BASHA, J.This Full Bench is constituted by the Hon'ble The Chief Justice on the basis of the reference made by one of us (Hon'ble Mr.Justice T.Sudanthiram)...
T.ElwIn Vs. 1. Sreekumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.2830 of 2002 & C.M.P.(MD)No.19161 to 19163 of 2002 T.Elwin ... Appellant Vs.1. Sreekumar 2. R.Lathika 3. United India Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office, Post Box No.5521, IInd Floor, Malankara Buildings, V.J.T.Hall Road, Palayam, Trinvandrum 034. ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the award and decree dated 08.02.2002 made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.72 of 1994, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Sub Judge), Padmanabhapuram. !For Appellant ... Mr.G.Sam Edwin Raj (No appearance) ^For Respondents... Mr.A.S.Mathialagan for R-3 R-1 and R-2 - dismissed for default - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / petitioner has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.72 of 1994, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Judge, Padmanabhapuram.2....
P.Pugalenthi Vs. High Court of Judicature at Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. /1/2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.ELIPE DHARMA RAO, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN Writ Petition No.991 of 2013 P.Pugalenthi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.High Court of Judicature at Madras, represented by the Registrar General, High Court, Chennai-600104. 2.Tmt.V.Subbulakshmi 3.Thiru T.Naga Dhanunjaya Rao .. Respondents - - - Writ Petition filed as Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of quo Warranto, calling upon respondents 2 and 3 to show under what authority of law they are holding the public office of the Assistant Registrar, High Court of Judicature, Madras and consequently declare the posts of Assistant Registrar presently occupied by respondents 2 and 3 vacant. - - - For petitioner - Mr.M.Radhakrishnan For R.1 - Mr.Haja Mohideen Gisthi and Mr.A.Navaneethakrishnan, Advocate General, assisted by Mr.A.Venkatesan, GP - - - ORDER ARUNA JAG...
1.Balasekar Vs. State by Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD) No.800 o1. Balasekar 2.Shanthi .. Appellants vs. State by Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.73 of 2001 on the file of Keelavalavu Police Station, Melur Circle, Madurai District.) .. Respondent Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Cr.P.C against the Judgment dated 09.06.2004 made in S.C.No.314 of 2002 on the file of the Additional District Sessions Court, Madurai. !For 1st appellant...Mr.A.R.Jeya Rhuthran State Brief Counsel For 2nd appellant ...Mr.R.Manickaraj ^For respondent ...Mr.C.Ramesh, Addl.Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) The appellants are the accused in S.C.No.314 of 2002 on the file of the learned Additional District Sessions Judge, Madurai. They stood charged for the offence under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC. Tota...
M/S.National Insurance Company Limited, Vs. 1.Ganesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.1100 of 2010 & M.P(MD)No.3 of 2010 M/s.National Insurance Company Limited, through its Divisional Manager, 92, Devarpuram Road, Tuticorin. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Ganesan 2.Muthulakshmi 3.J.Andrew Masilamani ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree dated 12.06.2008 passed in M.C.O.P.No.292 of 2003 (129/04 Subordinate Court, Thoothukudi), on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Thoothukudi. !For Appellant ... No appearance ^For Respondents... Mr.R.Vijayakumar for R-1 and R-2 Mr.A.Thiruvudaikumar for R-3 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent Insurance Company has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.292 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,...
R.Bhanumathy Vs. Director of Treasuries and Accounts
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.9842 of 2012 R.Bhanumathy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Chenna015. 2.Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Finance (T&A) Department, Chenna009. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of certiorarified mandamus as stated therein. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, Spl.GP O R D E R The petitioner seeks for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the order passed by the first respondent / the Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai, in Pro.Pdl.No.180/08/N2, dated 26.11.2008, insofar as it relates to non-inclusion of the petitioner's name therein and consequently, to direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the said panel for the year 2008-2009 for promotion from the p...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »