Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chitra Construction Company Vs. Addl Commissioner of Customs
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:4. 1-2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.20943 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 and W.P.No.22902 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Chitra Construction Company represented by its proprietor Sunil Kumar Shah Centre Point Building 4th Floor, Room No.405, 21,Hemanta Basu Sarani Kolkat001. .. petitioner in W.P.No.20943 of 2012 Chitra Builders Private Limited represented by its Managing Director Sunil Kumar Shah 119, Guruswamy Nagar Amaravathi Street Bharathiar University Post Coimbator046. .. Petitioner in W.P.No.22902 of 2012 vs.1. The Additional Commissioner of Customs Central Excise & Service Tax Head Quarters Preventive Unit 6/7, ATD Street Race Course Road Coimbator018. 2. The Superintendent of Central Excise & Service Tax Head Quarters Preventive Unit 6/7, ATD Street Race Course Road Coimbator018. .. Respondents in both the writ petitions W.P.No.20943 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitu...
Yasodha Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 01.2013 CORAM The Honourable Mr. Justice M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.18997 of 2010 Yasodha .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri. 2.The Tahsildar, Krishnagiri Dist. 3.Lakshmi Devi 4.Minor Manjamma 5.Minor Rajamani 6.Minor Amsa 7.Minor Venkatesh 8.Minor Bakkiyalakshmi .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent, to consider and decide the appeal filed by the petitioner on 1.9.2009, against the proceedings of the Tahsildar of Krishnagiri, for issuance of Legal Heir Certificate, dated 28.3.2006, in D.D.No.3517/2005/B.2, within a time frame. ----- For petitioner : Mr.V.Nicholas For respondents : Mr.P.Karthikeyan, Government Advocate for R.1 & R.2. ----- O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of res...
1.Panjavarnam Vs. Visuvasam Jeyaseeli
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2192 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 o1. Panjavarnam 2.Sankar 3.Sarathkumar .. Petitioners Vs Visuvasam Jeyaseeli .. Respondent Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order in I.A.No.914 of 2011 in O.S.No.115 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Paramakudi, dated 11.01.2012. !For petitioners... Mr.D.Senthil ^For respondent ... Mr.R.Sathish :ORDER Heard both the sides. The epitome and the long and short of the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition would run thus: The respondent / plaintiff filed the suit seeking declaration and permanent injunction in respect of the suit property on the main ground that it is a vacant site. Whereas, the defendants filed the written statement contending that they have been in possession and enjoyment of the suit property by co...
Dr.P.G.Viswanathan Vs. Director of Income Tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:4. 1-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.20073 and 20074 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.Nos.25070 and 25071 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.No.3362 and 3363 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.24563 and 24564 of 2005 and W.P.Nos.1279 to 1282 of 2005 W.P.No.20073 of 2003 Dr.P.G.Viswanathan .. Petitioner. Versus 1. Director of Income Tax (Investigation) 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.2. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle IV, 67A, Race Course Road, Coimbatore. .. Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Declaration, declaring the said search and seizure conducted by the department commenced on 12.9.2002 and concluded on 13.9.2002 against the petitioner in the premises of the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, void and without jurisdiction. For Petitioner : Mr.N.V.Nagasubramaniam, Senior Advocate for M/s.A.L.Gandhimathi For Respondents : Mr.Pramo...
Meeran Vs. 1.The General Manager,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P(MD)No.7940 of 2010 Meeran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, (Madurai Division), Bye-Pass Road, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai Division) Bye-Pass Road, Madurai. 3.The Administrator, Tamilnadu State Transport Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvallur Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay pension every month from 01.10.1999 with all arrears and with interest of 16% p.a. and other consequential benefits. !For Petitioner ... Mr.A.Shajahan ^For 1st Respondent... Mr.S.C.Herold Singh :ORDER The petitioner is seeking for a mandamus directing the respondents to pay the pension every month from 01.10.1999 with all arrears ...
M.Rajammal Vs. State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 01.2013 CORAM The Honourable Mr. Justice M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.27793 o1. M.Rajammal 2.M.Selvaraj 3.K.M.Anandhan .. Petitioners vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu, rep. the Secretary to Govt., Education Dept., Secretariat, Chennai-9. 2.The Director of School Education, [Higher Secondary], Chennai-6. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvannamalai Dist. 4.The District Educational Officer, Thiruvannamalai Dist. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, for the relief stated within. ----- For petitioners : Mr.R.Singgaravelan For respondents : Mr.P.Karthikeyan, Government Advocate. ----- O R D E R This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners to direct the respondents, to pass orders regularising the service of the father of the 2nd petitioner, from 2.6.1976 to 3.7.2007, notionally, and to pay his retirement benefits, along with the arrears of ...
Selvi Spinning Mill Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Date ::04. .01..2013 Coram :: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Dhanapalan Writ Petition Nos:28429. 28667, 28668, 30409, 30410, 30411, 30454, 30455, 30456, 30090, 30091, 30092, 30141, 30067, 30089, 30122, 29167, 29168, 29169, 29170, 29171, 30148, 30149, 30271, 30272, 30283, 30284, 30336, 30451, 30611, 30612, 30628, 30661, 31219, 31058, 31562, 31670, 31671, 31672, 9581, 9582, 9599, 9600, 9601, 9604, 9862, 9925, 9926, 9927, 9999, 10344, 10345, 14953, 18268, 4677, 4678, 4679, 4680, 4681, 4682, 4683, 5093, 5094, 5095, 5096, 5955, 5956, 7222, 7237, 7238, 7239, 7240, 7241, 7242, 7361, 7636, 7637, 31903, 31904, 32011, 32012, 32154, 32180, 32270, 32271, 32272, 32273, 32805, 3293833067. 32748, 32749, 7065, 8467, 8468, 24877, 30662, 33451, 33697, 7254, 7255 and 34688 of 2012 W.P. No:28429. of 2012 M/s. Selvi Spinning Mill No:27. 5, T.P. Road Kumarapalayam Post Annu653. ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Secretary Department of Energy For...
J.Sekar Vs. Metropolitan Transport Corporation
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 01.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.A.NO.349 OF 201.J.Sekar ... Appellant Vs. 1.Metropolitan Transport Corporation, (Chennai Division) Limited, rep.by its Managing Director, Pallavan Illam, Chenna002. 2.Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai Division) Limited, rep.by its General Manager, Pallavan Illam, Chenna002. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Appeal against the Order dated 10.12.2010 made in W.P.No.49656 of 2006 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.S.Vaidyanathan for M/s.C.S.Monica and Mr.V.T.Arun Thomas For Respondents : Mr.G.Muniratnam JUDGMENT R.BANUMATHI,J.The Writ Appeal is preferred against the Order passed by the learned single Judge dated 10.12.2010 in W.P.No.49656 of 2006.2. The writ petition is filed by the appellant against the order of the second respondent dated 22.11.2006 bearing Ref. Memorandum...
i.Ravichandran Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN W.P.No.2592 o1. I.Ravichandran @ Ravi Sam 2. Savithri Sam ... Petitioners vs.1. State represented by The Principal Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.2. The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Nandhanam, Chenna035. 3. The Special Tahsildar, (Land Acquisition), Housing Scheme Unit I, Coimbatore 18.4. The Executive Engineer, Special Division (II), Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Kowli Brown Board, R.S.Puram, Coimbator002. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in Letter No.20438/LA3(2)/08 dated 15.10.2009 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to exclude the lands in Survey Nos.46/2, 47/1, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 73/1, 2, 3, 74/1, 2, 3, ...
Sriram Ganapath Vs. State Represented by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL CRL.RC(MD)No.1 of 2013 Sriram Ganapathy .. Petitioner/Accused Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thirunagar Police Station, (In Crime No.714/2009), Madurai. .. Respondent/Complainant Prayer Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in C.C.No.363 of 2010 dated 11.07.2012 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.6, Madurai and set aside the finding of the 'Benefit of Doubt' pronounced in the Judgment and grant the relief of Honourable Acquittal. !For Petitioner ... Mr.A.John Vincent ^For Respondent ... Mr.P.Kandasamy Government Advocate (Crl.Side) :ORDER The Petitioner/Accused has preferred the instant Criminal Revision Petition as against the Judgment dated 11.07.2012 in C.C.No.363 of 2010 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate not VI, Madurai.2. The Learned Judicial Magistrate not VI...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »