Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hindustan Uniliver Limited Vs. Sree Annapoorna Foods
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:31. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN O.S.A.No.277 of 2012 & M.P.No.1 of 2012 Hindustan Uniliver Limited No.101, Santhome High Road R.A. Puram, Chennai-600 028. Rep.by its Chairman ..Appellant -Vs.- 1. Sree Annapoorna Foods No.643/3-B Vanaprastha Edyarpalayam Road Vadavalli Coimbator004. Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr.R.Velumani 2. R. Velumani ..Respondents Prayer:- Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original Side Rules read with clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 28 February 2011 in A.No.5296 of 2010 in C.S.No.674 of 2010 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.Sathish Parasaran For Respondents : Mr. T.R.Rajagopalan Senior Counsel for Mr.A.A.Mohan ----- JUDGMENT K.K.SASIDHARAN, J This appeal is at the instance of the unsuccessful petitioner in Application No.5296 of 2010 in C.S.No.674 of 2010 and the challenge is t...
A.P.Constructions Vs. Nirmala Kumari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :31. 01-2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN Criminal Revision Case No. 142 of 2006 and Crl.O.P. No. 12255 of 2007 Crl. O.P. No.142 of 2006 ------------------------ 1. A.P. Constructions rep. by its Managing Director A. Palanisamy 2. A. Palanisamy Managing Partner A.P. Constructions No.18, 4th Cross Street Dhandeeswar Nagar .. Petitioners Versus Nirmala Kumari Proprietix M/s. Sanjay Finance Sowcarpet, Chenna079. rep. by her Power of Attorney Holder Prakashchand Lalwani .. Respondent Crl. O.P. No.12255 of 2007 -------------------------- 1. Pannalal Kothari 2. Prakashchand Lalvani 3. Mrs. Nirmala Kumari .. Petitioners Versus 1. State by : Inspector of Police (Team III) Central Crime Branch Egmore, Chenna008. 2. Palanisamy (R2 impleaded as per the order dated 24.11.2009 in M.P. No. 1 of 2009 in Crl.O.P. No. 12255 of 2007) .. Respondents Crl.R.C. No. 142 of 2006:- Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C....
Startrek Logistics Pvt Ltd Vs. Check Post Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:31. 1.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.2611 and 2612 of 2013 Startrek Logistics Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Regional Manager-South Operations, R.Hariharan, No.521, Deccan heritage, 3rd Floor, Anna Salai, Chenna035. ... Petitioner in both W.Ps. vs. The Check Post Officer, Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Pethikuppam Check Post, Gummudipoond201. ... Respondent in W.P.No.2611 of 2013 The Commercial Tax Officer, Roving Squad-IV, (Enforcement), Chennai(South), Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. ... Respondent in W.P.No.2612 of 2013 Writ Petition No.2611 of 2013 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent passed in G.D.No.4980/2012-13 dated 27.12.2012 and quash the impugned proceedings dated 27.12.2012 and further direct the respondent to release the goods detained. Writ Petition No.2612 of 2013 is filed under Articl...
Anbu Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1118 of 2012 Anbu .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai District. 4.The Secretary, Advisory Board, Singaravelar Maligai, Ground Floor (Backside Entrance), Chennai Collectorate, No.32, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the entire records, connected with the detention order of the respondent No.2 in C.M.P.No.20 of 2012, dated 29.08.2012 and quash the same and direct the Respondents to produce the detenu namely Anbu, Son of Rajangam, aged about 27 years detained in Madurai Central Prison before this ...
C.Kavitha Vs. 1.The Joint Director of School Education,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P(MD)No.5314 of 2009 C.Kavitha ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Joint Director of School Education, Employees Division, D.P.I, College Road, Chennai-6. 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3.The District Educational Officer, Dindigl District. Dindigul. ... Respondents Prayer Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records from the third respondent relating to the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.7313-Aa1-2008, dated 19.11.2008 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to appoint the petitioner as Junior Assistant on compassionate ground. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Durairaj ^For Respondents ... Mr.R.Anandaraj Government Advocate :ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the third respondent, dated 19.11.2008, whereby her claim for compassionate appointmen...
Laser Soft Infosystems Ltd. Vs. the Income Tax Officer, Prince Info Pa ...
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
Vikas Awasthy, JM. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee impugning the order of the CIT(A)-IV, Chennai dated 1.11.2011 relevant to the assessment year 2007-08. The only issue involved in the appeal is whether the product development cost is revenue or capital in nature? 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a company engaged in the business of development and export of computer software mainly for the Banking and Financial service sector. For the assessment year 2007-08, the assessee filed its return of income on 31.10.2007 admitting income of ` 3,38,58,500/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer vide order dated 24.12.2009 disallowed certain expenses and made additions in the income returned by the assessee. The Assessing Officer inter-alia made additions on account of expenditure incurred by the assessee on product development. The assessee claimed the expenditure to be Revenue in nature. The stand of the assessee before...
A.Fathima Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.29618 of 2012 and M.P.No.2 of 2012 A.Fathima .. Petitioner Versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Chennai. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to treat the petitioner as Backward Class (Muslim) and include her name in the selection list published by the 2nd respondent on 16.10.2012 and appoint the petitioner in common degree past. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Devaraj For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Sivashanmugha Sundaram, AGP (For R1) Mr.N.S.Nandakumar (For R2) ORDER The petitioner applied for the post of Assistant in the Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, for which advertisement was given by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Co...
Ayyalusam Vs. State by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD).No.310 of 2008 and Criminal Appeal (MD).No.311 of 2008 and Crl.R.C(md).No.650 of 2008 Criminal Appeal (MD).Nos.310 and 311 of 2008: Ayyalusamy .. Appellant/Accused No.1 in C.A.310/08 Seetharaman .. Appellant/Accused No.2 in C.A.311/08 vs. State by the Inspector of Police Thiruvengadam Police Station, Sankarankovil, In Cr.No.32/2007, Tirunelveli District... Respondent/Complainant in both Crl.As Crl.R.C(md).No.650 of 2008: Laxmi Narayan ...petitioner/defacto complainant vs- 1.The State through the Inspector of Police, Thrivenkatam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (In Cr.No.32 of 2007) 2.Ramasamy 3.Rajeswari 4.Narayanasamy ... Respondents/Accused 3 to 5 Prayer in Crl.A.Nos.310 and 311/2008 Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code against the conviction and sentence passed by the Add...
R.Jai Ganesh Vs. C.Sathiya Bama
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:30. 1.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN C.R.P.(PD)No.4663 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 R.Jai Ganesh Petitioner vs. Mrs.C.Sathiya Bama Insane, rep by her Guardian and Father Thiru.P.Chittiraivel Respondent Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 2.2.2012 in I.A.No.131 of 2011 in H.M.O.P.No.411 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Poonamallee. For petitioner : Mr.N.Mariappan ORDER Petitioner in H.M.O.P.No.411 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Poonamallee is the revision petitioner.2. The revision petitioner filed H.M.O.P.No.411 of 2011 for annulment of marriage stating that the respondent is of unsound mind and also filed an application in I.A.No.131 of 2011 for appointment of a guardian for the respondent and that application was dismissed and as against the same, this revision is filed.3. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the application filed for annulment was filed by the petitioner o...
A.Shanmugam Vs. Management of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.7348 of 2012 A.Shanmugam ... Petitioner Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., 12, Ramakrishna Road, Sale007. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus as stated therein. For Petitioner : Mr.S.T.Varadarajulu For Respondent : Mr.B.S.Sundaramoorthy O R D E R The petitioner seeks for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondent management to provide alternate employment with pay protection and continuity of service, backwages and other attend benefits from 13.10.1997, date of discharge on medical ground, as per Section 47 of Persons with Disabilities (Equal opportunities, protection of Rights and Full participation) Act, 1995 (in short "Act") 2. The petitioner was employed as Conductor. After completing his duty on 26.10.1996, he remitted the ticket...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »