Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
T.Saikrishnan Vs. Narendran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:31. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA O.A.No.1076 of 2012 in C.S.No.833 of 2012 T.SAIKRISHNAN S/O.THANDAPANI, PROP: M/S.SKYLINK COMMUNICATIONS, NO.65/4, KALI AMMAN KOIL ST, VIRUGAMBAKKAM, CH-92. VS R1 MR.NARENDRAN PROP.M/S.AMMAN NETWORK COMMUNICATION, NO.29/10 FEROZ SAHIB ST, ROYAPETTAH, CH-14. R2 MR.THANNEERMALAI PROP.M/S.PRASANNA SAT VISION O.NO.38, THYPHOON ALI KHAN ST, CHEPAUK, CH-5. R3 MR.MATHIVANNAN PROP.M/S.SRI VENKATESWARA CABLE VISION, NO.30/51, MUKTHARUNNISA BEGUM ST, ELLIS ROAD, ANNA SALAI, CH-2. R4 THE GENERAL MANAGER, RAILTEL CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD, 4TH FLOOR, CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER BLOCK, CAO/CN/MS E.V.R.PERIYAR SALAI, CH-8. R5 ASHOK KUMAR @ JOHN DOE . R6 ASHOK KUMAR @ JOHN DOE . R7 ASHOK KUMAR @ JOHN DOE . R8 ASHOK KUMAR @ JOHN DOE . ORDER The plaintiff/applicant has filed this application for interim injunction restraining the respondents 1 to 4 and other unknown defendants represented by John Doe...
Tag this Judgment!K.Periyasamy Vs. Wtate, by Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31/01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD) No.437 of 2007 K.Periyasamy ... Appellant/ Accused No.1 vs. Wtate, by Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatty Police Station, Vaiyamaptty. (Crime No.26/2004) ... Respondent/ Complaint Criminal Appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 30.07.2007, in S.C.No.247 of 2005 on the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court not II, Tiruchirappalli. !For Appellant ... Mr.S.Mahendrapathy ^For Respondent ... Mr.A.Ramar, Addl.Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU,J) The appellant is the 1st accused in S.C.No.247 of 2005 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court not II, Tiruchirappalli. Altogether, there were two accused, including the appellant herein, The 1st accused/appellan...
Tag this Judgment!T.Mahesh Kumar Vs. Asst Commissioner Labour
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :31. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.Nos.35136 to 35141 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1, 1, 1, 1, 1, & 1of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1, 1, 1, 1, 1 & 1 of 2013 W.P.No.35136 of 2012 T.Mahesh Kumar ... Petitioner Versus 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation) II, Kuralagam, 3rd Floor, Chennai-600 108. 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Petroproducts Ltd., (Principal Secretary Industries Dept, Government of Tamil Nadu) Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 3.The Management of Tamil Nadu Petroproducts Ltd., Rep. by Managing Director, Manali Express Highway, Manali, Chennai-600 068. 4.The General Manager (HRM), Tamil Nadu Petroproducts Ltd., Manali Express Highway, Manali, Chennai-600 068. 5.Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, Tuticorin-628 005. ... Respondents W.P.No.35137 of 2012 A.Arvind Kumar ... Petitioner Versus 1.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation) II, Kurala...
Tag this Judgment!M.Velu Vs. Teachers Recruitment Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:31. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.Nos.6227, 21475 and 29918 of 2012 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 in W.P.NO.21475 OF 201.1. M.Velu 2. R.Arulmozhi 3. K.Adimoolam 4. M.Murugan .. Petitioners in W.P.6227/2012 1. M.Velu .. Petitioner in W.P.21475/2012 1. M.Murugan .. Petitioner in W.P.29918/2012 Vs.1. The Chairman Teachers Recruitment Board 4th floor, EVK Sampath building College Road, Chenna2. The Secretary to Government Department of School Education Secretariat Fort St.George, Chennai-9 3. The District Employment Officer Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District 4. The Director of Professional and Executive Employment, Santhome High Road Chennai 5 .. Respondents in W.P.Nos.6227 & 21475 o1. The Chairman Teachers Recruitment Board 4th floor, EVK Sampath building College Road, Chenna2. The District Employment Officer Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District 3. The Director of Professional and Executive Employment, San...
Tag this Judgment!K.Uma Maheswari Vs. 1.The Additional Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1502 of 2013 K.Uma Maheswari .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Additional Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution Department of Consumer Affairs, Room No.270 Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi-110 001. 2.The Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Co-Operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. 3.The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirapalli City, Tiruchirapalli. 4.The Inspector of Police, CS.CID, Tiruchirapalli. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the records pertaining to the order of detention passed by the third respondent in his proceedings Prevention of Detention order C.P.O/TRC/B.M./D.O.No.12/2012 05.12.2012 and quash the same as illegal and produce the detenu, namely T.Ganesan, ...
Tag this Judgment!C.Jacob Sumithran Vs. Young Mens Christian Association
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:31. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN O.S.A.NOS.460 AND 46.OF 201.1.C.Jacob Sumithran 2.George Fernandez 3.B.Watson, 4.S.D.Joseph .. Appellants in both O.SAs Vs. Young Men's Christian Association, represented by its General Secretary, having Office at 24/223, NSC Bose Road, Chenna041. .. Respondent in both O.SAs Prayer: Original Side Appeals in O.S.A.Nos.460 and 461 of 2012 are filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXXVI Rule 9 of O.S.Rules against the Order dated 10.12.2012 made in Applications in O.A.Nos.1029 and 10-30 of 2012 respectively in C.S.No.791 of 2012 on the file of this Court. For Appellants : Mr.Silambanian Senior Counsel for M/s.Profexs Associates For Respondent : Mr.G.Rajagopalan Senior Counsel for Mr.V.R.Thangavelu JUDGMENT R.BANUMATHI,J.Being aggrieved by the order dated 10.12.2012 passed by the learned single Judge dismissing the Applicatio...
Tag this Judgment!Rajeswari Vs. 1.The Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:31/01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1535 of 2012 Rajeswari .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Union of India Rep by Secretary to Government Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Room No.270, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi -110 001. 2.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by Secretary to Government, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai-9. 3.The Commissioner of Police, Trichirappalli District, Trichirappalli. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the detention order by the 3rd respondent herein against the petitioner's husband Ramesh, Son of Gandhi, aged about 33 years, under prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of essential commodities Act 1980 (Act 7/1980) as a "Black Marketer" in detention order in C....
Tag this Judgment!Sri Krishna Educational Trust Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:31. 01.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.2204 & 2205 of 2006 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2006 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2007 Sri Krishna Educational & Social Trust, Plot No.14, 1st Main Road, Ponmeni Jainagar, Madura010. ... Appellant in both Tax Cases Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Cuddalore ... Respondent in both Tax Cases APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench, dated 06.07.2006, in ITA Nos.169/Mds/2006 and 170/Mds/2006. For Appellant in both Tax Cases : Dr. Anitha Sumath For Respondent in both Tax Cases : Mr. J.Narayanaswamy - - - C O M M O N S.Vimala, J., The assessee is a Charitable Trust running various educational institutions. The assessee claimed exemption under the provisions of Section 10 (22) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (hereinafter will b...
Tag this Judgment!R.Raghavan Vs. Dr.R.Venkitapathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :31. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA A.No.99 of 2013 and C.S.No.748 of 2012 R.Raghavan .. Plaintiff Vs. 1 Dr.R.Venkitapathy 2 Dr.R.Krishnamoorthy 3 Dr.R.Lakshmipathy 4 R.Sathyamurthy 5 Mr.Justice Somasundaram (Retd.) 6 Mr.Justice R.Jayasimha Babu (Retd.) 7 Mr.Justice S.S.Subramani (Retd.) .. Defendants The suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C. for declaration of the order of the defendants 5 to 7 on 23.7.2012 is illegal and invalid with consequential relief to declare the additional claims submitted by the defendants 1 to 4 are void, ultra vires the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.and for cost. For Plaintiff : Mr.T.S.Baskaran For Defendants 1 to4 : Mr.P.Mahadevan ***** O R D E R Application No.99 of 2013 under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules r/w Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. has been filed to reject the plaint being barred under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act....
Tag this Judgment!Hindustan Uniliver Limited Vs. Sree Annapoorna Foods
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:31. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN O.S.A.No.277 of 2012 & M.P.No.1 of 2012 Hindustan Uniliver Limited No.101, Santhome High Road R.A. Puram, Chennai-600 028. Rep.by its Chairman ..Appellant -Vs.- 1. Sree Annapoorna Foods No.643/3-B Vanaprastha Edyarpalayam Road Vadavalli Coimbator004. Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr.R.Velumani 2. R. Velumani ..Respondents Prayer:- Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original Side Rules read with clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 28 February 2011 in A.No.5296 of 2010 in C.S.No.674 of 2010 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.Sathish Parasaran For Respondents : Mr. T.R.Rajagopalan Senior Counsel for Mr.A.A.Mohan ----- JUDGMENT K.K.SASIDHARAN, J This appeal is at the instance of the unsuccessful petitioner in Application No.5296 of 2010 in C.S.No.674 of 2010 and the challenge is t...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »