Skip to content

Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 28 2013

G.Sowmyasri Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-28-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.41 of 2013 G.Sowmyasri .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kantharvakottai Police Station, Pudukottai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Pudukkotai, Pudukkottai District. 4.Muthusamy 5.Aandal .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the detenue, namely, Gopinath @ Chellappa, aged 29 years, husband of the petitioner before this Court and set him at liberty. !For petitioner ... Mr.D.Selvaraj ^For respondents 1 to 3... Mr.R.Ramachandran, Additional Public Prosecutor For respondents 4 & 5 ... Mr.M.Karunanidhi :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) The petitioner claims to be ...


Jan 24 2013

Tahsildar of Mambalam Guindy Taluk Vs. Kaneez Fathima

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :24. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.Nos.22054 of 2009 and 4110 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2009 and 1 of 2010 W.P.No.22054 of 2009 : -------------------- The Tahsildar Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Bharathidasan Salai, Chennai-600 078. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Kaneez Fathima 2.Durab Zaman Begam 3.Dosth Mohamed Sherif @ Kaja 4.Hyder Sherif @ Aga 5.Humayun Zamam @ Hima 6.Basheer Ahamed @ Babu 7.Shameer Ali 8.Ahmed Sheriff 9.Karamat Zaman Begam 10.Settlement Officer, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. .. Respondents W.P. No.4110 of 2010 : -------------------- Director i/c, King Institute of Preventive Medicine and Research, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Durab Zamam Begum 2.Karamat Zamam Begum 3.Dosth Mohamed Sherif @ Kaja 4.Hyder Sherif @ Aga 5.Humayun Zamam @ Huma 6.Basheer Ahamed @ Babu 7.Kaneez Fathima 8.Shameer Ali 9.Ahmed Sheriff 10.The Settlement Officer, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 11.M/s.Chennai Metro Rail Ltd., represent...


Jan 24 2013

Ashakina Begum Vs. T.M.Varatharajan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :24.01.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice R.KARUPPIAH W.P.No.4913 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 --- Ashakina Begum .. Petitioner -vs- 1.T.M.Varatharajan 2.V.Mahalakshmi 3.Indian Bank Gandhi Road Branch Rep. By its Chief Manager Authorised Officer Mr.L.Raman Kancheepuram-634. The Branch Officer Syndicate Bank Purasawalkam Branch Chennai 5.The Branch Manager Dena Bank George Town Branch Chennai .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Mandamus forbearing respondents 3 to 5 and his men, agents, servants and any person claiming through or under them from interfering with the petitioner's lawful possession and enjoyment of the property situated at Sruthilaya Apartments, Flat not F-1, First Floor, Old Door No.32 and 32-A (New No.37), Bharatheeswarar Colony, 4th Street, Kodambakkam, Chennai-24 except under due process of law. F...


Jan 24 2013

R.Manonmani Vs. District Collector of Tiruvallur District

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.3214 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 R.Manonmani .. Petitioner Versus 1.The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ponneri Revenue Division, Ponner204. Tiruvallur District. 3.The Tahsildar, Ponneri Taluk Office, Ponner204. 4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Work Department, (Building Construction and Maintenance), Ponner204. 5.Jayagopal Garodia Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Rep. By its Headmistress, Venbakkam, Ponner204. .. Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to restrain the respondents from encroaching into and also constructing any structure or building in the petitioner's property, being vacant site situate at Venbakkam village, Ponneri Revenue Village, Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur District, comprised in Survey No.528/8 (part) & 5...


Jan 24 2013

R.Veeramani Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :24. 1-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR W.P.Nos.30326 of 2011, 18404 of 2012 and 31313 of 2012 MP.SR.Nos.141185 & 144183 of 2012 in W.P.No.30326 of 2011 MP.SR.Nos.141156 & 144182 of 2012 in W.P.No.18404 of 2012 and Connected miscellaneous petitions R.Veeramani ... Petitioner in W.P.Nos.30326/2011 and 18404/2012 S.A.Miyajan ... Petitioner/Party-in-person in W.P.No.31313/2012 Versus 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Chief Secretary, Fort St. George, Chenna009. 2. The Secretary, Public Works Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.3. The Chief Engineer (Buildings) Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.4. The Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. ... Respondents 1-4 in W.P.30326/2011 and 18404/2012 5. J.Ramesh ... 5th respondent in W.P.30326/2011 State of Tamilnadu represented by its Secr...


Jan 24 2013

T.Ruby Christie Vs. K.Ramesh

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA O.A.No.528 of 2012 in C.S.No.424 of 2012 T.Ruby Christie vs. K.Ramesh FOR PETITIONER : V.G.Suresh FOR RESPONDENT : Chandrasekaran ORDER: O.A.No.528 of 2012 in C.S.No.424 of 2012 VINOD K. SHARMA,J., The plaintiff / non applicant has filed suit for recovery of Rs.36,07,500/- (Rupees Thirty Six Lakhs Seven Thousand and Five Hundred only) advanced against promissory note against defendant no.1. In the suit, prayer has also been made for grant of permanent injunction, restraining defendant no.1 from transferring the property to defendant nos.2 to 23 till payment due to the plaintiff/non applicant.2. It is not disputed, that defendant no.2 is not the owner of the property and is only developer of property, who has entered into agreement with defendant nos.2 to 23 as attorneys of the true owners and not in his own right.3. The property under development therefore cannot be said to be suit ...


Jan 24 2013

Selvam Vs. Mangaiyarkarasi

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :24. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Second Appeal No.1057 o1. Selvam 2. Kumaran 3. Kannan 4. Arivazhagan .... Appellants / plaintiffs Vs. Mangaiyarkarasi .... Respondent / defendant Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code as against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Judge of Cuddalore, dated 9.7.2000 passed in A.S.No.54 of 1997 dismissing the appeal, confirming the decree and judgment of the Subordinate Judge of Panruti in O.S.No.14 of 1996, dated 16.6.1997. For Appellants : Mr.R.Gururaj For Respondent : Mr.S.K.Raghunathan - - - Plaintiffs are the appellants. The suit was filed informa pauperis in O.P.44 of 1991 by the father (on behalf of his three minor sons) and the major son seeking declaration that the sale deed, dated 22.07.1981, will not bind the plaintiffs 4/5th share and for consequential reliefs. The suit was decreed. The defendant preferred the first appeal...


Jan 24 2013

S.Kumar Vs. R.Thangaraj

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN Crl.R.C.No.810 of 2008 S.Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. R.Thangaraj ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under section 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code seeking to call for the records in C.A.No.178 of 2007 on the file of the Learned VII Addl. Sessions Judge Court, Chennai, confirming the Judgment dated 19.07.2007 made in C.C.No.6058 of 2003, on the file of the Learned XV M.M. G.T., Chennai and set aside the Judgment dated 05.01.2008 passed in C.A.No.178 of 2007 on the file of the Learned VII Addl. Sessions Judge Court, Chennai and thereby acquit the Petitioner in C.C.No.6058 of 2003 on the file of the Learned XV M.M. G.T., Chennai. For Petitioner : M/s.P.K.Gopal Raj For Respondent : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan O R D E R This criminal revision is filed seeking to call for the records in C.A.No.178 of 2007 on the file of the learned VII Additional Sessions Judge Court, Chennai, ...


Jan 24 2013

Registrar of the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University Vs. Union of I ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :24. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.31129 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, No.69,Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Union of India, rep by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi. 2.The Medical Council of India, represented by its Empowered Committee. (R2 impleaded as per order dated 23.1.2012 in W.P.No.31129 of 2007) 3.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. (R3 impleaded as per order dated 20.2.2012 in M.P.No.1 of 2012) .. Respondents This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent, its officers and subordinates to consider the application of the petitioner dated 29.8.2007 for the grant of perm...


Jan 24 2013

G.Thangakumar Vs. Chief Educational Officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.11309 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2012 G.Thangakumar .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Erode District, Erode. 2.The District Educational Officer, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District. 3.The Secretary, Diamond Jubilee Higher Secondary School, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District. 4.P.Kandasamy P.G.Assistant (English) Diamond Jubilee Higher Secondary School, Gobichettipalaya542. Erode District. 5.The Joint Director, Higher Secondary Education, Directorate of School Education, Chennai-6. 6.K.Arumugam, P.G.Assistant (Zoology) Diamond Jubilee Higher Secondary School, Gobichettipalaya542. 7.K.M.Nachiappan P.G.Assistant (Botany) Diamond Jubilee Higher Secondary School, Gobichettipalaya542. Erode District. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the fift...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial