Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
1.Murugan Vs. the State,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRIMINAL APPEAL(MD) No.259 of 2005 ..... 1.Murugan 2.Udayakumar 3.Sundar ... Appellants -versus- The State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Sembatti Police Station Dindigul District. [Crime No.264 of 2001] ... Respondent Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Cr.P.C against the Judgement 26.05.2005 in S.C.No.165 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Dindigul. !For Appellants ... Mr.V.Kathirvelu, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Mahendrapathy ^For respondent ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGEMENT The Appellants are the Accused 1 to 3 in S.C.No.165 of 2004 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Dindigul. Altogether, there were 16 Accused in the said case including Appellants. They stood charged for various offences as detailed below. T...
1.S.Singaram Vs. State, Rep by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRIMINAL APPEAL (MD).No.188 o1. S.Singaram 2.M.Karuppan 3.M.Rengasamy 4.P.Selvam ... Appellants Vs. State, rep by the Inspector of Police, Karambakkudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District, Crime No.304 of 2005. ... Respondent PRAYER Appeal is filed under Section 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in S.C.No.76 of 2006, on the file of the learned Additional District Judge and Fast Track Court, Pudukkottai, dated 16.02.2007 and set aside the same. !For Appellants ... Mr.V.S.Ramalingam ^For Respondent ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT ************* [Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.] The appellants are the accused in S.C.No.76 of 2006, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court], Pudukkottai. Altogether, there were nine accused. By Judgment d...
M.Muthuswamy Vs. Principal of Pachaiyappan College
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:28. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.Nos.15798 of 2007, 26165 to 26170 of 2012, M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2007, M.P.No.1 of 2010 in W.P.Nos.15798 of 2007, M.P.Nos.1 to 1 of 2012 in W.P.Nos.26165 to 26170 o1. M.Muthuswamy 2.P.Meganathan 3.N.Krishnamoorthy 4.A.S.Arunachalam 5.S.Thenmozhi ..Petitioners in W.P.Nos.15798/2007 Dr.V.Seenivasan .. Petitioner in W.P.No.26165/2012 C.Panneerselvam .. Petitioner in W.P.No.26166/2012 S.Saileela .. Petitioner in W.P.No.26167/2012 D.Ammu .. Petitioner in W.P.No.26168/2012 Dr.K.Kennedy .. Petitioner in W.P.No.26169/2012 Dr.T.V.Swaminathan .. Petitioner in W.P.No.26170/2012 Vs. 1.The Principal Pachaiyappan College, Chenna030. 2.The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu Administrator Pachaiyappa's Trust, Chennai. 3.The College Committee Pachiyappa's College, Chenna030. 4.The Director of Collegiate Education, College Road, Chennai. ..Respondents in W.P.Nos.15798/2007 1.The Admi...
State, Vs. 1.Danushkodi Alias Sudalaimuthu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD).No.1395 of 2012 M.Rajappa alias Sultan .. Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. 2.The District Collector/District Magistrate Collectorate, Kokirarakulam, Tirunelveli District-9. 3.The Superintendent of Central Prison, Palayamkottai Central Prison, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the entire records connected with the detention order in M.H.S.Confdl No.57/2012, dated 30.06.2012 passed by the Respondent No.2, against petitioner namely M.Rajappa @ Sultan, S/o.Maideen Abdul Kadhar aged about 36 years residing at Malaiyan Street, Tenkasi, Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District, now confined at Cen...
M/S.Energo Engineering Projects Ltd., Vs. 1)sri Aishwarya Construction ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA C.M.A.(MD).No.7 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2013 M/s.Energo Engineering Projects Ltd., Rep. by its Senior Vice President, Randhir Grover, NTPL Power Plant, Thoothukudi ... Appellant Vs.1) Sri Aishwarya Constructions, Rep. by its Managing Partner, K.Lakshmipathy No.54, Rajaji Road, Block No.18, Neyveli-607 803.2) Neyveli Tamil Nadu Power Limited, (NTPL), Represented by its Chief Executive Officer, NTPL Power Plant, Thoothukudi. ... Respondents Prayer Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, against the order dated 27.11.2012 made in I.A.No.392 of 2012 in AROP.No.470 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi. !For Appellant ... Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai ^For R1 ... Mr.M.Vallinayagam, Senior Counsel for Mr.K.Samidurai For R2 ... Mr.P.S.Sundaram :JUDGMENT The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by M/s.Ener...
Maheswaran Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:28.01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN Crl.R.C.No.138 of 2007 Maheswaran ...Petitioner Versus State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Kinathukadavu Police Station Thamarikulam Village, Pollachi, Coimbatore Dt. ...Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the order passed by the Additional District, Fast Track No.1, Coimbatore as an appellate court by conforming the sentence and convicting the petitioner u/s 304(A) IPC for one year simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.2000/- in default simple imprisonment for 3 months by its judgment passed in C.A.No.469 of 2004 dated:24. 01.2007 conforming the judgment in C.C.No.485 of 2000 dated 06.10.2004 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate No:1. at Pollachi. For Petitioner :Mr.Ananthakrishnan for M/s.Ma.P.Thangavel For Respondent :Mr.R.Prathap Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This revision is filed a...
P.V.R.S.Manikumar Vs. the Official Liquidator
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:28.01.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN O.S.A.No. 92 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009 P.V.R.S. Manikumar ..Appellant -Vs.- 1. The Official Liquidator High Court, Madras as the Official Liquidator of M/s. Indag Products Limited (in liquidation) 2. Samuel James Fredrick 3. N. Chandrasekaran 4. M.J.Premnath 5. P. Bhuvaneswari 6. B. Raghavan ..Respondents Prayer:- Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original Side Rules read with clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 6 February 2009 in C.A.No.1081 of 2004 in C.P.No.101 of 1994 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.V. Ramakrishnan for Mr.C.Seethapathy. For Respondents : Mr. S.R.Sundar for R.1 Mr. Aryaraj for R.2 Mr. M. Devaraj for R.4 RR 3.5 & 6 Served No Appearance JUDGMENT K.K.SASIDHARAN, J This appeal at the instance of the Ex-Director of a Company in Liquidation raises a moot...
Srinivasa Reddy Vs. Vyjayanthimala
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :28. 01.2013 C O R A M : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Rev.Application No.185 of 2012 Srinivasa Reddy .. Applicant/Respondent /vs/ 1.Vyjayanthimala 2.K.Bhaskaran .. Respondents/Appellants 1 &3. Lalitha 4.Ramamoorthy 5.Govardan 6.Parthasarathy 7.Chitra 8.Gomathi 9.Rajan 10.Padmanabhan 11.Lakshmikanthammal .. Respondents/Respondents This Review Application has been filed under Order 47, Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C. against the order passed by this Court in S.A.No.415 of 2011 dated 22.08.2011. For Applicant : Mr.R.Margabandhu ORDER This review application is filed to review the judgment and decree made in S.A.No.415 of 2011 dated 22.08.2011. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the review applicant submitted that while interpreting Ex.A2-Will, this Court has not properly appreciated the provisions of Sections 88 and 89 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and having regard to the provision of Section 89 of the Indian Su...
M.K.indhira Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1531 of 2012 M.K.Indhira .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai District. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to produce the body or person, the petitioner's daughter, namely, K.Suganya, aged 19 years, and to set her at liberty. !For petitioner ... Ms.S.Vijayashanthi ^For respondents 1 and 2 ... Mr.R.Ramachandran, Additional Public Prosecutor :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the detenue, namely, K.Suganya, aged about 19 years, the daughter of the petitioner, and to se...
Pugazhenthi Vs. Sundari Ammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :28. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY A.S.No.504 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 o1. Pugazhenthi 2.Vijaya .. Appellants Vs. 1.Sundari Ammal 2.Udaya Vani 3.Bhuvaneswari 4.Suganthi 5.Bavagarnan 6.Ayyanar 7.Vibeshanan 8.Sivakumar 9.T.G.Santhakumar .. Respondents (R9 impleaded as per order dated 05.06.2012 made in M.P.No.1/2012 in A.S.No.504/2010) First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, made in O.S.No.5 of 2007 dated 07.06.2010. For Appellants : Mr.N.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.Ravichandran (R6) Mr.A.P.Neelamega Vannan (R5 & R9) R1 to R4 No appearance R7 & R8 Ex parte in lower Court The above first appeal arises against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.5 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram. 2.The plaintiffs are the appellants, the respondents 1 to 8 were the defendants and the ninth respondent, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »