Chennai Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Brinda and Others Vs. Subramanian (Died) and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
(Prayers: Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree dated 11.09.2001 in A.S.No.21 of 1999 on the file of the Learned Subordinate Judge, Ranipet, Vellore District, in confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 26.03.1999 in O.S.No.69 of 1993 on the file of the Learned District Munsif, Ranipet. Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree dated 11.09.2001 in A.S.No.22 of 1999 on the file of the Learned Subordinate Judge, Ranipet, Vellore District, in confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 26.03.1999 in O.S.No.477 of 1992 on the file of the Learned District Munsif, Ranipet.) Common Judgment 1. The Appellants/Defendants have preferred Second Appeal No.1640 of 2003 as against the Judgment and Decree dated 11.09.2001 in A.S.No.21 of 1999 passed by the Learned Subordinate Judge, Ranipet, Vellore District. The Appellants/Plaintiffs have preferred Second Appeal No.1641 of 2003 as against the Judgment ...
Chrome Leather Company Ltd., Rep. by Its Manager A. Selvakumar Vs. Q. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
(PRAYER: Appeal filed under Order XXXVI, Rule 1 of O.S. Rules r/w. Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the fair and decretal order dated 29.6.2012 made in Application No.2361 of 2011 in O.P.No.382 of 2010.) P. DEVADASS, J. As against the dismissal of Application No.2361 of 2011 in O.P.No.382 of 2010 which has been filed to revoke the order probating the Will of late George Joseph Chambers, this appeal has been directed by Chrom...
Selvi Vs. Balasubramanian and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
(Prayer: Second Appeal against the judgement and decree dated 15.10.2004 passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam, in A.S.No.111 of 2003 and in Cross Appeal No.111 of 2003, reversing the judgement and decree dated 30.4.2003 passed by the II Additional District Munsif, Vridhachalam, in O.S.No.220 of 1995.) 1. This second appeal is focussed by the plaintiff in the suit, as against the judgement and decree dated 15.10.2004 passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam, in A.S.No.111 of 2003 and in Cross Appeal No.111 of 2003, reversing the judgement and decree dated 30.4.2003 passed by the II Additional District Munsif, Vridhachalam, in O.S.No.220 of 1995, which was one for partition. 2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court. 3. A r'esume of facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this second appeal, in a few broad strokes can be encapsulated th...
Klene Paks Limited, Represented by Its Manager, E. Amarnath and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the files of the respondent herein in Goods Detention Notice No.44/2012-13, dated 27.8.2012, and quash the same.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. In view of the similar orders passed by this Court, in a number of writ petitions, including the order, dated 21.12.2010, made in W.P.No.29050 of 2010, the following order is passed: i) The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.3,07,056/-, which is the amount of tax demanded by the authority concerned, while passing the detention order. ii) On payment of such tax amount, the goods detained shall be released and the same shall be subject to the final adjudication order, which may be passed by the authority concerned. iii) It is made c...
P. Ramachandran Vs. the Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Ceratiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the 2nd respondent loan termination Letter dated on 4.6.2012 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents to grant education loan to a sum of Rs.3,10,000/-.) 1. The petitioner's son joined B.E. (E.C.E.) course in GKM College of Engineering and Technology during the academic year 2011-12. He obtained 876 marks in plus two examination. He made an application dated 02.10.2011 to the second respondent-Bank for educational loan. He claimed Rs.3,10,000/-. His request was rejected by the second respondent-Bank by the impugned order dated 04.06.2012. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the aforesaid order dated 04.06.2012 and for a direction to the second respondent-Bank to sanction educational loan as sought for in his application. 3. Heard both sides. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner su...
K. Chandran Vs. V. Geethalakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
R. Subbiah, J. 1. This is an application filed by defendants 1 to 3 and 12 to reject the plaint in the present suit. 2. Respondent is the plaintiff and she filed the suit as against the defendants numbering 12 for the following reliefs; "(a) to declare the plaintiff as the absolute owner of the suit schedule property; (b) to direct defendants 1 to 3 to surrender vacant possession of the suit property; (c) to declare the sale deed executed by late Mrs.Dhanalakshmi, Nirmala (D4) and late Purushothaman in favour of K.Chandran (D1) registered as Doc.No.1305 of 1985 dated 06.05.1985 on the file of SRO., Saidapet, Chennai-15 as null and void and unenforceable; (d) to declare the sale deed executed by late Mrs.Dhanalakshmi, Nirmala (D4) and late Purushothaman in favour of Meena (D2) registered as Doc.No.1303 of 1985 dated 06.05.1985 on the file of SRO., Saidapet, Chennai-15 as null and void and unenforceable; (e) to declare the sale deed executed by late Mrs.Dhanalakshmi, Nirmala (D4) and lat...
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd, Dha ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
(Prayer: Appeal preferred under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award and decree dated 28.06.2005 made in M.C.O.P.No.233 of 2003 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Sub-Court), Krishnagiri.) R. BANUMATHI, J. 1.Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation of Rs.13,87,000/- awarded for the death of G. Sivasankar in road traffic accident on 24.7.2002, Appellant-Transport Corporation filed this appeal. 2. Brief facts are that on 24.7.2002 at about 4.10 P.M., deceased Sivasankar was proceeding in his Yamaha motorcycle bearing registration No.TN-29 E 8013 towards Dharmapuri on Krishnagiri-Dharmapuri NH 7 road. When the deceased was nearing Sapthagiri Juice Factory, between Karimangalam and Periyampatti, the Appellant-Transport Corporation bus bearing registration No.TN-29 N 0885 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner and hit against the deceased and that the deceased was thrown away. Due to the impact, Sivasankar sustained grievous injuries. Im...
N. Rajasekhar, Chennai Vs. the District Manager Chennai Central Tasmac ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents had submitted that the entire arrears of rent, due to the petitioner, shall be paid to him, within a period of 10 days from today. 3. In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, since no further orders are necessary, the writ petition stands closed. No cost....
Mettur Textiles Mill Quarters Residents Welfare Society, Rep. by Its P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
(Prayer: Appeals against the common order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 8.3.2012 in Company Application Nos.242 and 243 of 2012 in Company Petition No.125 of 1988.) (P.JYOTHIMANI,J.) 1. These appeals are directed against the order of the learned Single Judge in dismissing the applications filed by the appellant, to wit Mettur Textiles Mill Quarters Residents Welfare Society, on the ground that the appellant/society has been whiling away its time from 2009 when an advertisement was issued for sale of properties of the company under liquidation relating to Item No.7 comprising of 33.03 Acres of land and has approached the Court belatedly when the sale was confirmed by the Company Court in favour of the second respondent, being the highest bidder, for a sale consideration of Rs.12,50,00,000/-. 2.1. Succinctly put, the facts leading to the filing of these appeals are that the Mettur Textiles Industries Limited, which has been wound up, was taken over by the Official Liquidator a...
M/S. Sree Rajendra Textiles Rep by Its Partner Amarish, Karnataka Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-05-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of mandamus, to hold that the contracted value payable and paid to the supplier of imported goods is the transaction value as defined under sec. 14 (1) of the petitioner under the contract No.10 ZS 225 dt 10.7.2010 covered under Bills of Entry Nos. 7207028, 7205737 dt 25.6.2012 and B.E. No.7609587 dt 7.8.2012 on the import of Thrown Silk Yarn in Hanks of Vietnam Origin through Chennai Port.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that this Court had passed orders, in similar matters, directing the provisional release of the goods in question, subject to the following conditions: "(1) The petitioner shall pay the entire amount of duty, to the department, forthwith, as per the declared value, which may be based on the contract or price e...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »