Chennai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Sivaraman Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-27-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide the electricity connection to the petitioner's property at No.89, Ground Floor, Palace View Apartment, Block No.2, Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028 within a stipulated period.) 1. Heard Mr.G.R.Lakshmanan, learned counsel representing Mr.J.Ravi Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.G.Vasudevan, learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.A.Thiyagarajan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Mr.S.Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the third respondent. 2. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide the electricity connection to the petitioner's property at No.89, Ground Floor, Palace View Apartment, Block No.2, Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028 within a stipulated period. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he purchased...
idol of Arulmigu Ranganatha Swamy, Rep. by Joint Commissioner, Trichir ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-27-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action on the illegal construction of the 3rd respondent at T.S.No.2297, Door No.168, Mela Chithirai Street, Srirengam, Trichy.) ORDER 1. The petitioner in this case is Idol of Arulmigu Ranganatha Swamy represented by the Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Ranganatha Swamy Thirukoil, Srirengam. 2. In the writ petition the petitioner/temple sought for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the 3rd respondent in proceeding with the illegal construction at T.S.No.2297, Door No.168, Mela Chithirai Street, Srirengam. 3. When the matter came up on 24.07.2012, this Court admitted the writ petition and granted interim injunction. Subsequently, the name of the 1st respondent / District Collector being a party to the writ petition, has been deleted and the writ petition was dismissed as against the 1st ...
K. Lakshmipathy Vs. the Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records from the file of the 1st respondent herein in C.No.C1/49305/2011 and to quash the order dated 02.12.2011 passed therein.) ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the 1st respondent / Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, dated 02.12.2011. 2. In the impugned order the 1st respondent has stated that the case in Cr.No.205/2011 on the file of the Kovilpatti West Police Station filed under various provisions of IPC and Indian Arms Act, has been investigated by the Inspector of Police, Kovilpatty West Police Station and he filed the charge sheet before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatty on 10.08.2011. Further, the offences, under which the investigation was madem, were under Section 120(b), 294(b), 406, 420, 506(ii) IPC r/w 35 IPC and 25(i)(A) of Indian Arms Act. The final report has not been taken...
The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 13.7.2006 made in MCOP.Nos.868 and 869/2005 by the learned Subordinate Judge (MACT) Gingee.) 1. These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed by the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Villupuram against the Judgment and Decree dated 13.7.2006 made in MCOP.Nos.868 and 869/2005 by the learned Subordinate Judge (MACT) Gingee, whereby the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.7,60,000/- as total compensation to the claimants in MCOP.No.868/2005 for the death of the deceased Rajamani, who died in the motor accident that had occurred on 13.10.2003 and a sum of Rs.40,000/- as total compensation to the injured claimant Natarajan in MCOP.No.869/2005 for the injuries sustained by him in the same accident. 2. On 13.10.2003, when the deceased and the injured claimant were travelling in the TVS-50 Motorcycle towards Narasinganur Village (Gingee to Villupuram main Road), they were hit by the bus bearing Reg....
Dhandapani Vs. C. Parameswaran (Deceased) and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Judgement and Decree dated 25.11.2002 made in MCOP.No.47/2002 by the learned Principal District Judge (MACT) Namakkal.) JUDGEMENT 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Judgement and Decree dated 25.11.2002 made in MCOP.No.47/2002 by the learned Principal District Judge (MACT) Namakkal, whereby the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.28,165/- as total compensation with interest at 9 per cent p.a. and fastened the liability on the 1st Respondent, the owner of the vehicle, exonerating the 2nd Respondent Insurance Company from the liability. 2. The briefly stated facts are that while the Appellant/claimant, a minor was standing on the Eastern side of the road in front of the Sirunel Kovil Primary School, the tempo (mini lorry) driven in the rash and negligent manner dashed against the claimant, as a result of which, he was thrown out and sustained head injury. The minor claimant represented by his mother S...
Vasuki Vs. M. Govindarajan, Proprieteor, Chennai and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the order dated 18.3.2003 made in IA.No.55/2002 in WC.No.124/2001 by the Deputy Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Chennai.) 1. The applicant before the Labour Deputy Commissioner-II for Workmen's Compensation, Chennai is the Appellant in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and it is filed assailing the order dated 18.3.2003 made in IA.No.55/2002 in WC.No.124/2001, whereby the Labour Deputy Commissioner dismissed the claim petition on the ground that the deceased V. Saravanakumar being an employee of the 1st Respondent registered with the Employees State Insurance Corporation, the applicant is barred from claiming compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. 2. The brief facts are that the Appellant's son Saravanakumar was employed under the 1st Respondent for more than two years prior to the accident and on 18.11.2000, he met with an accident and died on 20.11.2000. At the time of the accident, he was aged a...
P. Manickam and Another Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer -cum- Sub D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the first respondent herein in M.C.No.5642/2012/A4, dated 03.08.2012, quash the same and consequently, direct the second respondent herein to maintain the sit out in question as referred in the schedule of the property of the impugned proceedings.) ORDER 1. In this case, the petitioners have come forward to challenge a preliminary order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer -cum- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Usilampatti, dated 03.08.2012. The said order came to be passed in terms of Section 133(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The property that is described is an elevated platform put up in the Grama natham poramboke in Mekkilarpatti coming under Usilampatti Taluk. The Revenue Divisional Officer, exercising her power under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Proce...
The State, Represented by Inspector of Police Vs. S. Saminathan and Ot ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(2) of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai in C.C.No.176 of 1997 dated 11.3.2005.) 1. This appeal has been arising out of the judgment of acquittal passed by learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai on 11.3.2005 in C.C.No9.176 of 1997. 2. The appellant/CBI filed a final report against the accused under section 120-B r/w. section 420, r/w.511, 467, 471, 468, 468 r/w.471, 201 IPC and 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of PC Act 1988 against A1 to A3 and under section 468 r/w.471 IPC against A1 and A2 and under section 468 IPC against A1 to A3 and under section 468 r/w.471 IPC against A1 to A3, under section167 of IPC against A2, under section 467 rw.471 of IPC against A1 and A2, under section 420 r/w.511 IPC against A1 to A3, under section 201 IPC against A1 and A2 and under section 13(2) r/w.13(1)(d) of P.C. Act, 1988 against A1 and A2 . 3.The case of the prosecution...
D. Vasantha Vs. E. Balasubramaniam and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Judgement and Decree dated 30.12.2008 made in MCOP.No.4866/2005 by the learned II Judge, Court of Small Causes (MACT) Chennai.) 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Judgement and Decree dated 30.12.2008 made in MCOP.No.4866/2005 by the learned II Judge, Court of Small Causes (MACT) Chennai, whereby the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.2,42,300/- as total compensation to the claimant/appellant for the injuries sustained by her in the motor accident that occurred on 24.10.2005. 2. The accident dated 24.10.2005 resulted in grievous injuries to the Appellant. As a result of the said injuries, her left leg was amputated below the knee. The disability of the claimant has been assessed at 40 per cent in respect of lower limb by disability certificate Ex.P8 issued by PW.4 Doctor. PW.4 had deposed that the victim would find it difficult in walking even if an artificial limb is fixed and she cannot carry on her avocatio...
P. Janakiraman Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Superintending Engi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 CPC read with Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules for a judgment and decree a) directing the defendant to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.1,97,61,768/- together with interest at 18% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.1,08,28,149/- from the date of suit till the date of realization; b) directing the defendant to pay the cost of the suit and c) for other orders as this Hon'ble may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) JUDGMENT The plaintiff has filed the suit on the following plaint averments:- i) Plaintiff is engaged in the business of undertaking contracts for laying of roads, construction of bridges and culverts and other allied civil works. He has also been registered as a Class-I contractor in the Highways Department (State Level) in the State of Tamil Nadu. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Superintending Engineer, Highways, Chennai Circle, invited tenders for the work of widening and strengthening of the...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »