Chennai Court August 2012 Judgments
N.R. Gayathri Vs. the Principal Secretary/Special Commissioner, Integr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order of the first respondent herein passed in Proc.Rc.No.17623/E1(2)/2011 dated 30.3.2012 transferring the petitioner to Villupuram District and consequently transferring the second respondent herein to Tiruvallur District and the order of the third respondent herein passed in Proceedings Na.Ka. No.362/2012/A1 dated 4.4.2012 relieving the petitioner and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent herein to re-transfer the petitioner to Child Development Project Office Poonamallee.) ORDER 1. The petitioner was appointed as Junior Assistant in the Social Welfare Department in the year 1977. She was promoted as Assistant in the year 1989. She was further promoted as Superintendent in the year 1989. 2. In 1989, she was deputed to Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS). She was working in Tiruvallur District...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Gem Granites Rep. by General Manager Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the application/representation of the petitioner for grant of transport permit and consequently grant the necessary transport permit to the petitioner to transport quarried materials from their quarry site in S.No.1193/8 and S.No.1193/9 of Kodaikkal Village, Wallajah Taluk.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 23.7.2012, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made ...
Tag this Judgment!M. Parasuraman Vs. the Secretary to Government, Handloom, Handicrafts, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
(Prayer: Memorandum of Grounds of Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P. No.7024 of 2009 dated 8.12.2011.) JUDGMENT M.Y. EQBAL 1. This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 8.12.2011 passed by the learned single Judge in W.P. No.7024 of 2009 in the writ petition filed by the appellant herein for a direction to quash the letter of the first respondent dated 9.3.2009, give notional promotion to the appellant and pay him all arrears of pay and allowances for the service period along with consequential terminal and pensionary benefits. 2. The appellant/writ petitioner joined the respondent-Khadi Board in the year 1971 as Typist. He was subsequently promoted to various cadres and last promoted as Assistant Director in the year 1994, the next avenue of promotion being Deputy Director. The appellant's name was included in the panel of consideration for promotion to the post of Deputy Director in the...
Tag this Judgment!Mrs. Josephine Kala Rani Vs. the Superintending Engineer, Valluvarkott ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
(Prayer: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus for a direction to the respondents to restore the electricity service connection bearing No: 333-012-1055 at No: 9, C-2 Adwave Towers, 1st floor, South Boag Road, Chennai – 600 017, which was disconnected by them on 13.06.2012.) 1. Writ petitioner, who is a tenant under the 4th respondent, has come before this Court with a prayer to direct the respondents to restore the electricity service connection bearing No: 333-012-1055 at No: 9, C-2 Adwave Towers, 1st floor, South Boag Road, Chennai – 600 017, which was disconnected by them on 13.06.2012. 2. According to the petitioner, she is a tenant in the above said premises. The landlord of the property is causing nuisance to her without assigning any reason, with an intention of evicting her by his henchmen. He has disconnected the water connection. Therefore, she has filed a suit for an injunction restraining the lan...
Tag this Judgment!The Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Madra ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
(Prayer: It is a Taken up Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pursuant to a news item published in 'The Hindu' dated 21.9.2004, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to provide safety levels to the villagers around the SIPCOT Industrial Estate near Cuddalore Town, such as demands for continuous air monitoring, including for toxic gases, an aggressive air pollution elimination programme, long term health monitoring specialised health case facilities for residents and a ban on the setting up or expansion of any polluting facility in the complex.) ORDER ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J. The State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT) was established in the year 1971 to develop industrial growth in Tamil Nadu. To ensure a good impact with the available limited resources, SIPCOT has created Industrial Complexes and Parks, strategically located in Nineteen places and Twelve Districts in the State, including one at Cuddalore. Resp...
Tag this Judgment!Radhika Charles Vs. the Regional Transport Officer and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified Mandamus to call for the impugned order in Letter R.No.05512/B3/2012, dated 23.04.2012 passed by the first respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to return the petitioner's original certificate of registration dated 02.01.2009 of TATA Safari Vehicle Bearing No.PY 01AT8312 and in turn the third respondent shall carry out the necessary mutation in respect of residential address in certificate of registration dated 02.01.2009.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 4. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 4 had submitted that there is an alternative remedy of appeal available to the petitioner, to challenge the impugned proceedings of the first respondent herein. He had submitted that the pe...
Tag this Judgment!P. Vanchinathan and Others Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer Vellore ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the seized Lorry bearing Registration No.TN 32 AA 1460 seized on 23.08.2012) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to release the Lorry bearing Registration No.TN 32 AA 1460, seized on 23.08.2012. 3. In view of the averments made on behalf of the petitioner and in view of the earlier orders passed by this Court, in similar matters, the First respondent is directed to release the Lorry, bearing Registration No.TN 32 AA 1460, to the petitioner, forthwith, on his fulfilling the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall establish the ownership of the vehicle, by producing the necessary documents and the certificates, befor...
Tag this Judgment!Velammal Matriculation Hir. Secondary School, Rep. by Its Corresponden ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition No.11446 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records of the respondent committee which culminated in the Order dated 3.6.2011 under Section 6(4) of Act 22 of 2009 made with respect to the Petitioners School (CC No.30402)and quash the same as arbitrary, unreasonable and illegal and further direct the respondent to reconsider the representations made by the petitioners with respect to fixation of fee for classes from LKG to XII standard by following the directions of this Court in the judgment in Tamil Nadu Nursery, Matriculation and higher Secondary Schools Association v. State of Tamil Nadu, reported in 2010(2) LW 726 by giving an opportunity to the Petitioners to put forth its case.) Writ Petition No.11447 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records of the respondent commit...
Tag this Judgment!S. Jayaraman and Another Vs. the Corporation of Madras, Rep.by Its Com ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
(Prayers: S.A.No.308 of 2006: is filed against the judgement and decree dated 12.12.2005 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, cum Fast Track Court No.IV, Madras, in A.S.No.362 of 2003 confirming the judgement and decree dated 18.7.2003 passed by the XIII Assistant City Civil Judge, Madras in O.S.No.7829 of 1993. S.A.No.521 of 2006 is filed against the judgement and decree dated 30.4.2004 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge(2nd Fast Track Court, Chennai), in A.S.No.140 of 2001 confirming the judgement and decree dated 11.12.2000 passed by the V Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai in O.S.No.1026 of 1992.) Common Judgement 1. S.A.No.308 of 2006 is filed by the 4th defendant in the suit-Jayaraman, as against the judgement and decree dated 12.12.2005 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, cum Fast Track Court No.IV, Madras, in A.S.No.362 of 2003 confirming the judgement and decree dated 18.7.2003 passed by the XIII Assistant City Civil Judge,...
Tag this Judgment!Wendt (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
The appellants are in appeal against the impugned order wherein input service credit availed by them on outdoor catering service was denied on the ground that the same is not covered under the definition of Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.2. The adjudication took place and the Commissioner observed that CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 were notified vide Notification No.23/04-CE (NT) dt. 10.9.2004 which was issued in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 37 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994. He further observed that no rule can so be interpreted as to take this scope beyond the power under which that Rule has been made. Therefore, input service credit was denied as the same has not been availed by the appellant in relation to the manufacture of the final product. It was further observed by the Commissioner that these activities are only for the welfare of the employees. Therefore, they are not entitled for CENVAT credit. 3. Examined the impug...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »