Chennai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Abdul Nabi Vs. Canara Bank Gomathipuram Branch, Rep. by Its Manager ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
(Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent in Ref.el.ssr/gomathi/2011, dated 10.02.2012 and the endorsement of the 2nd respondent dated 02.03.2012 made in the application of the petitioner and to quash the same and further direct the respondents herein to sanction the education loan for the petitioner's daughter.) ORDER 1. The petitioner is an Advocate by profession practicing before the District Court, Madurai. He has daughter by name Asha Begum. She is studying first year MBBS course at Annapoorna Medical College and Hospital at Salem affiliated to Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, Chennai and an approved institution under the Medical Council of India. She got admission in the said college under Management quota. To meet the educational expenses of his daughter, the petitioner approached the 1st respondent-Bank in the month of August-2011 to avail of educati...
R. Rangarajan and Another Vs. Secretary to Government Agriculture Depa ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
(Prayer: PRAYER IN W.P.(MD)NO.8877 OF 2010 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent herein to promote the petitioner as Chief Engineer, Agricultural Engineering Department taking into account the original date of appointment i.e.5.3.1979 and in the light of the order of the first respondent issued in G.O.Ms.No.176, Agriculture (AA3) Department, dated 27.05.2004, together with all consequential service and monetary benefits. PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.12515 of 2011 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent passed in G.O.(Valayam) No.318, Agriculture (Ve.Ni.3) Department, dated 30.09.2011 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents 1 and 2 to promote the petitioner in the post of Chief Engineer as per the seniori...
The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai and Others Vs. P. P ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
(The Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite parties praying for the direction to the opposite parties to pay back Rs.41,180/- alongwith compensation of Rs.50000/-. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred praying to set aside the order of the District Forum dt.08.07.2010 in CC. No.12/2009. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 17.07.2012. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsel on either side, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order in the open court:) THIRU A.K. ANNAMALAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. 2. The complainant availed the agricultural service connection for his field, under the self financing scheme 2002-2003, after paying the advance of Rs.500/-, and subsequently on demand made by the 3rd opposite party, paid a sum of Rs.9500/- as per the ...
K.S. Sahadevaraja Vs. the Commissioner, Rajapalayam Municipality and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from entering upon the land bearing Town Survey No.52 (old) new 110, Malayadipatti in Block No.7 and Ward-H of Rajapalayam Municipality.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from entering upon the land bearing Town Survey No.52 (old) new 110, Malayadipatti in Block No.7 and Ward-H of Rajapalayam Municipality and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper and render justice. 2.The facts leading to the filing of this writ petition are as follows: (a) The property referred to above originally belonged to the father of the petitioner and after his death, the said property was inherited by petitioner and five brothers and they are the joint owners of the said property. (b) The brother of the petitioner Tr.K.S.Bheemaraja applie...
Parameswaran Vs. the Inspector of Police, N-1 Royapuram Police Station ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to invoke the power of superintendence and set aside the order dated 30.07.2012 passed by the learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.3129 of 2012 and consequently, grant bail to the petitioner in the case in Crime No.841 of 2012 pending on the file of the respondent police.) 1. The petitioner is the 2nd Accused in Crime No.841 of 2012 on the file of the respondent police. Initially, the said case was registered under Section 174 of Cr.P.C. During the course of investigation, it was altered into one under Sections 304(1) and 304(A) of IPC. The petitioner was arrested by the respondent on 27.07.2012 and produced before the learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, with a request for remanding him to judicial custody. In the request for remand itself, the respondent submitted to the court that the petitioner had been arrested only on the allegations that he...
D. Kannan Vs. the Commissioner Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondents, especially the second respondent relating to his proceedings made in Me.Thu.Na.Ka.No.Mae.1/Aa1/2550/99, dated 07.04.2000 along with the enquiry report dated 23.10.2002 and the 1st respondent relating to his proceedings, viz. Final order made in Me.Thu.Na.Ka.No.Aa2/2550/2007 dated 22.08.2007 and quash the same as null and void, illegal and invalid and consequently to direct the respondents to issue paper order for reinstatement with all service and monetary benefits.) (prayer clause amended as per order dated 02.08.20120) 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the order Me.Thu.Na.Ka.No.Mae.1/Aa1/2550/99, dated 07.04.2000 as also the enquiry proceedings being null and void, illegal and invalid, with the consequential relief of reinstating the petitioner in service with all service mone...
S.Annavi Pillai and Another Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayer:This petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No.3603 and 3604 of 2002 from the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to appoint the petitioners as Village Administrative Officer in Karur District.) COMMON ORDER 1. This order shall dispose of W.P.No.6844 and 6845 of 2007 as the common question of fact and law are involved in these two writ petitions. 2. For the sake of brevity, the facts have been taken from W.P.No.6844 of 2007. 3. The petitioners have approached this Court with the prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to appoint the petitioners as Village Administrative Officer in Karur District. 4. The petitioner was appointed as Karnam and continued in service on the post of part time Village Officer namely, Village Karnam. The post of Village Karnam, Head Man were abolished vide ordinance of the Government with effect from 14.11.1980. 5....
Kanniyammal Vs. Dhanabagyammal and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayer: Civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the fair and decreetal order dated 29.08.2008 passed by the learned IV Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai in E.S.No.17 of 2002.) 1. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision petition. He has also made an endorsement to the following effect: "The petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the C.R.P." 2. In view of the same, this civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
Murugesh @ Murugesan Vs. State by Sub-inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayer: This Criminal appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction and sentences passed by the learned Additional Sessions judge cum Fast Track Judge, Thanjavur in S.C.No.68 of 2005, dated 19.09.2007) M. Vijayaraghavan, J. 1. The appellant/accused No.1 has filed this Criminal Appeal questioning the legality of the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Judge, Thanjavur in S.C.No.68 of 2005, dated 19.09.2007, in and by which the appellant/accused was convicted for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo two months simple imprisonment. 2. The brief case of the prosecution is as follows: (i) P.W.4-Durai of Ammachathiram knew the deceased Boopalan, who was working at Housing Board Office and on 17.03.2003 at 10.45 hours, he went to the Housing Board Office to see Boopalan to get money for his ailing uncle residing at Swamimala...
The Lakshmi Mills Company Limited, Rep. by Its General Manager Vs. the ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his Na.Ka.A1/27/2011 dated 14.06.2012 and quash the same.) ORDER R.BANUMATHI, J. 1. Challenging the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent issued under Section 145 of Criminal Procedure Code in Na.Ka.No.A1/27/2011 dated 14.06.2012 calling upon the writ petitioner to remove the obstruction caused by the petitioner for smooth flow of sewage of flood water in S.No.81/2A1A1 of Inam Maniyachi village. 2.In order to appreciate the contentions raised, it is necessary to refer to the background facts. The sewage water accumulated in the town area of Kovilpatti has been running through many survey numbers in Kovilpatti town and finally through Town S.No.52 and enters in S.No.81/2A1A1 of Inam Maniyachi village and proceeded in between writ petitioner - Lakshmi Mills and the S...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »