Chennai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Selva Murthy Vs. the District Collector, Thiruvallur District and Othe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-13-2012
(Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus to direct the 3rd respondent herein to issue tender application form to run the bar attached to the TASMAC shop bearing No.9197 situated at No.556,CTH Road, Tiruninravur, Thiruvallur District.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed, praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the third respondent, to issue tender application form, relating to the bar attached to the TASMAC Shop, bearing No.9197, situated at No.556, CTH Road, Tiruninravur, Thiruvallur District. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, on instructions, had submitted that the tender process, in respect of the shop in question, had been completed, on 24.07.2012 and therefore, the prayer in this Writ Petition, has become infructuous. 4. In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behal...
D. Ravindar Vs. the Commissioner of Agriculture
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-13-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the name of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Directors of Agriculture/Horticulture in the existing vacancies, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court by placing him in the order of seniority as per the original list of seniority and to pass such further or other orders.) 1. The petitioner was appointed as Agricultural Officer on 2.04.1985. Thereafter, he was working as Agricultural Development Officer in the same cadre, in the office of the Assistant Director of Agriculture at Krishnagiri. 2. According to the petitioner, the next avenue of promotion is Assistant Director of Agriculture. 3. The petitioner was imposed with a punishment of 'censure' by an order dated 30.12.2006, pursuant to the proceedings initiated under Rule 17(a) of the Tamilnadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules. 4. The grievance of the petiti...
G. Gnanasekaran Vs. the District Manager, Tasmac Limited, Madurai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the 1st respondent's proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1053/2012/H, dated 04.06.2012 and quash the same and forbearing the 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents from in any way initiating any action to evict the petitioner illegally and unlawfully from the land measuring about 11 cents and situate in R.S.No.241/3, Madurai North Taluk at Aathikulam, wherein the petitioner have established a TASMAC Retail Shop bearing No.5132 and running an appended "Bar".) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of certiorari, to quash the order Na.Ka.No.1053/2012/H, dated 04.06.2012 with a consequential relief of prohibition, restraining the respondents 1,2 and 3 from taking action to evict the petitioner illegally and unlawfully from the land measuring 11 cents situated in R.S.No.241/3, Madurai North Taluk at Aathikulam, where the peti...
K. Saravanan Vs. the Executive Officer Poolampatti Town Panchayat Sale ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: W.P.No.7850 of 2012: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Prohibition prohibiting the first respondent or his sub-ordinates from renewing or allowing to operate Boat License in favour of the second respondent beyond 1.4.2012 for crossing the River Kavery between Poolampatti and Nerinijipettai without resorting to public auction. W.P.No.9641 of 2012: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.10/2008, dated 26.3.2012 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to issue fresh boating license by resorting to public auction. COMMON ORDER 1. Since, the issues involved in both the writ petitions are similar in nature, they had been taken up together and a common order is being passed. 2. Heard the learned counsels app...
B. Vijayakumar S/O. N. Balakrishnan Nair and Another Vs. the Tamil Nad ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent, pertaining to its order in Letter No.4753/S4/2012, dated 29.06.2012, on its file and consequential order of the second respondent in No.TNMA/003/EST-/11-12 dated 30.06.2012 on his file and quash the same, directing the respondents to have the petitioner in his job in the first respondent academy in continuation of the same till 30.06.2012. ORDER The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court, with the following prayer:- “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, any other writ, direction or order in the nature of a Writ, calling for the records of the first respondent, pertaining to its order in Letter No.4753/S4/2012 dated 29.06.2012 on its file and consequential order of the ...
The Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore Vs. M/S. Elgi Ultra Industri ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: T.C.No. 451 of 2006 :-Tax Case Appeals against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, D Bench, Chennai, dated 26.10.2005 passed in I.T.A.No.1631/Mds/ 2003 for assessment year 1996-97. T.C.Nos. 218 and 219 of 2007 :-Tax Case Appeals against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, D Bench, Chennai, dated 17.02.2006 passed in I.T.A.Nos.1539 and 3413/Mds/ 2004 for assessment year 2000-01 and 2001-02 respectively.) COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J) The Revenue has filed the above appeals as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment years 1996-97, 2000-01 and 2001-02. The T.C.(A).No. 451 of 2006 was admitted on the following substantial question of law:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80IA of the Act, even though the assessee is not engaged as such ...
Sriman Narayana Sago Factory, Represented by Its Proprietor Namakkal D ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the files of the respondent herein in TNGST No.3160788/2004-05, dated 31.5.2012, quashing the proceedings of the respondent herein while directing the respondent to re-do the assessment year TNGST/2004-05, after examining the books of accounts of the petitioner.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the impugned proceedings, dated 31.5.2012, had been passed, by the respondent, without considering the replies, dated 2.4.2012 and 27.7.2012, filed on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner had not been given an opportunity to produce the books of accounts before passing the impugned proceedings, dated 31.5.2012. Therefore, the impugned...
Sri Adinath Traders Rep by Its Proprietor Kailash Kumar and Another Vs ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondent in GDN.8/2012-13 dated 7.8.2012 and quash the same.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for taxes, appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. In view of the similar orders passed by this Court, in a number of writ petitions, including the order, dated 21.12.2010, made in W.P.No.29050 of 2010, the following order is passed: i) The respondent is directed to pass orders quantifying the tax to be paid and serve a copy of the said order on the petitioner, within a period of two days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said order, the petitioner shall pay the tax quantified by the authority. ii) On payment of such tax amount, the goods detained sha...
K. Venkattesn @ Milagaipodi Venkatesan Vs. the Commissioner of Police ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the petitioner's name from the History Sheet Rowdy S.No.1/2008 on the file of the 3rd respondent viz., The Inspector of Police, M-4 Redhills Police Station, Redhills, Chennai 52.) ORDER 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties concerned. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents, to remove the petitioner’s name from the History Sheet (Rowdy S.No.1/2008), on the file of the third respondent and to pass such further orders, as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. It has been stated that the petitioner is living, along with his family members, in a permanent address, at Red Hills, Chennai. He is carrying on transport business for his livelihood. He is paying income tax to th...
M/S. A.R.F. Engineering Pvt Limited, Rep.by Its Joint Chairman A. Suri ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in CST/587580/2008-09 quash the impugned proceedings dated 19.03.2012 and further direct the respondent to follow the procedure contemplated under the Tamilnadu Value Added Tax Act 2006 read with Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 by issuing a notice calling for objections by providing an opportunity to produce the C declaration forms and thereafter pass orders in accordance with law.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties concerned. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the respondent had passed the impugned assessment order, dated 19.3.2012, without issuing a notice to the petitioner and without giving an opportunity to it to file its objections, along with the relevant records, including the C declaration forms. Therefore, the learned counsel appearing for...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »