Chennai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Shyamaladevi Vs. the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Rep. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to furnish the complete set of answer sheets together with the first page containing the evaluation particularly in respect of the subjects Obstertrics Gynaecology and Family Welfare (Paper IandII) and Paediatrics including Neonatology of the petitioner having Regn. No.52063222 pertaining to the final year MBBS examinations 2011-2012 held during February, 2012 within a time to be fixed by the court and in the event of any error in the evaluation process being found, pass suitable orders for re-evaluating the petitioner's said answer sheets.) ORDER 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for a direction to the respondents to furnish the complete set of answer sheets together with the first page containing the evaluation particularly in respect of the subjects Obstertrics Gynaecology and Family Welfare (Paper I and ...
P. Muthuponnu Vs. the District Collector Madurai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order issued by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.29813/2012/Sa.Vu.Thi.1 dated 13/7/2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to appoint the petitioner for the post of Noon Meals Cooker in Madurai West Panchayat Union Middle School, Thenur, madurai District.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order in Na.Ka.No.29813/2012/Sa.Vu.Thi.1 dated 13/7/2012, ordering appointment of the fourth respondent as Noon Meal Cook at Madurai West Panchayat Union Middle School, Thenur, Madurai District. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner was married in the year 2010 with one Pavunraj according to Hindu Marriage Rites and Ceremonies. Out of their wedlock, one male child was born. The husband of the petitioner died on...
C. Annamalai Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the Bullock cart seized by the respondents from the petitioner.) 1. Mr.R.Ravichandran, the Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to release the Bullock cart seized by the Tahsildar, Gudiyatham, Vellore District, on 03.07.2012, from the petitioner. 3. Heard Mr.Paul Noble Devakumar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.R.Ravichandran, Additional Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondents. 4. In view of the averments made on behalf of the petitioner and taking into consideration the relief prayed for by the petitioner, in the present Writ Petition and as similar orders have been passed by this Court, the first respondent is directed to release the bullock cart, to ...
A. Logirajan Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Dindigul
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent in O.R.No.115/2005-2006, dated 20.03.2006, quash the same.) ORDER 1. Being aggrieved by the proceedings in O.R.No.115/2205-2006, dated 20.03.2006, of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, (Roving Squad), Dindigul, the respondent herein, directing the petitioner to pay a tax of Rs.5,36,250/- or to furnish a security for a value of Rs.18,00,000/- in the form, prescribed under Rule 35(4) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as "TNGST Rules") for not remitting the Entry Tax at 13% under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990, before 20.09.2005, to the Commercial Tax Officer II, Theni, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a contractor, engaged in small civil construction works. He ...
M/S. Leo Enterprises, Rep. by Its Proprietor V. Ambalal Vs. the Commis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from further detaining the Imported goods i.e., 2320 sheets (40 pallets) of Medium Density Fiber Board covered under Bill of Entry No.7025782/06.06.2012. ORDER 1. M/s. Leo Enterprises has invoked the extra ordinary equitable Jurisdiction of this Court, with a prayer for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Prohibition, to restrain the respondents, from further detaining the Imported goods i.e., 2320 sheets (40 pallets) of Medium Density Fiber Board covered under Bill of Entry No.7025782/06.06.2012. 2. The petitioner is in the business of Import Trade and Local Trade of plywood sheets, Fiber Boards etc., and has been allotted an IEC for conducting import business by the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Zonal Office, Chennai, Ministry of Industry and Commerce, Government of India. 3. The petitioner, in the course of business entered into High Se...
S.C. Mathavan Vs. V. Ramathilagam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records and quash the C.C.No.475 of 2010 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Mettupalayam.) 1. The petitioner is the Accused in C.C.No.475 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Mettupalayam. The Respondent is the defacto complainant and he has filed the complaint under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. The allegations in the complaint are:- On 05.01.2008, the petitioner/accused borrowed a loan of Rs.2,00,000/- from the Respondent/Complainant and in consideration of the same, on the same day, the petitioner executed a promissory note in favour of the Respondent/Complainant agreeing to repay the same with interest at the rate of 24% per annum. Thereafter, the petitioner/accused did not make any payment towards the above loan either towards the principal or interest. 3. Subsequently, on 02.07.2010, the petitioner/accused issued an anti-dated cheque dating as 17.07.2...
Saradha Ramachandran Vs. the Regional Transport Authority Cum District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to transfer existing vehicle of Saradha Road lines along with the permit for the route from Embal to Elankurichi to the name of the petitioner and her mother Akilandam in the place of her father K.Yagnasubramanian.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No.1 to transfer the existing vehicle of Saradha Road lines along with the permit of the route from Embal to Elankurichi to the name of the petitioner and her mother Akilandam in the place of her father, K.Yagnasubramanian. 2. The Writ Petition as framed is not competent. It is the case of the petitioner that before transferring the route permit, the competent authority is to hold an enquiry under Section 82 read with Rule 211 of the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Act and Rules. It is also the case of the petitioner that an application has been ...
Seagul Infras, Represented by Its Proprietor, C. Manivannan Vs. the As ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer:Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant refund or transfer the amount of Rs.89,440/- collected and remitted in the State Bank of India, Coimbatore vide Challan No.13, dated 08.02.2011 to the files of the Second Respondent herein in TIN No.33390925645 in consequence to the order of the proceedings of the Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement), Odanthurai Roving Squad, Coimbatore giving effect to the proceedings of the Joint Commissioner (CT), Coimbatore in his RP.No.26/2011, dated 14.7.2011 as per their petition dated 28.02.2012.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 28.2.2012, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned co...
Thiruvengadathan Vs. the Chairman, Administrative Office, Pandiyan Gra ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned charge memo in AIVD/V/334/12-13 dated 27.4.2012 and impugned letter in Personnel Administration Department/PAD/04/2012-13 dated 28.4.2012 passed by the respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to pay all retirement benefits with interest to the petitioner within a stipulated time.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the Charge Memo dated 27.4.2012 issued for violating Regulations 18 and 20 of the Pandyan Grama Bank Staff (Officers and Employees) Service Regulations 2010, which is punishable as per Regulation 39(1)(b) of the said Service Regulations. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned charge memo on the ground that the charge sheet was issued to the petitioner 2 days prior to the date of attaining the age of superann...
E.B. Mary Raveena Vs. Antony Ravikumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under section 55 of the Indian Divorce Act, against the order dated 09.01.2011 passed in F.C.O.P.No.1454 of 2010 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai.) 1. This Appeal arises out of an order of dismissal (09.01.2011) passed by the trial court/Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, in F.C.O.P.No.1454 of 2010 filed by appellant herein seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion under section 10(1)(ix) and (x) of the Divorce Act, 1869. 2. Case of the appellant, in brief, is as follows: Appellant is the wife of respondent. The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 28.05.2004 at Arcot Luthran Church, Cuddalore according to Christian rites and customs and was duly entered in the Register. They had been living together as husband and wife in the respondent's house for a a period of six months. Thereafter, the attitude of respondent became changed. Respondent's parents used to beat the appellant and used to scold he...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »