Chennai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Saravana Pavan Nadarajah Vs. Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayre: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to recall the result declared on 10.03.2012 for 524061 - Micro Biology (Paper I and II) and 524063 Pathology (Paper I and Paper II) for the II MBBS examination sessions, February 2011 in respect of the petitioner and to declare the petitioner's result for the said papers based on the evaluation done by the Professors Dr.K.Vasanthi, Professor in Pathology in Kilpauk Government Medical College, Chennai-10 and Royapettah Government General Hospital, Chennai-14 and Dr.G.Sumathi, Professor - HOD of Department of Microbiology in SMMCH and Research Institute, Chikkarayapuram, Chennai-69 respectively and to issue fresh comprehensive mark sheet for all the papers of II year MBBS to the petitioner within a reasonable time to be fixed by this court enabling the petitioner to continue the next year course in MBBS without any...
V. Karupayee Vs. the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District and A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents from appointing any candidate to the post of Cook by direct recruitment without considering the petitioner for appointment to the said post of Cook by promotion in the light of G.O.Ms.No.163 dated 18.08.2010 and by considering her representations dated 02.06.2012 and 04.06.2012 within the period that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has approached this Court, with a prayer for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Mandamus, to prohibit the respondents, from appointing any candidate to the post of Cook, by direct recruitment, without considering the petitioner for the appointment, by promotion in the light of G.O.Ms.No.163 Social Welfare and Nutrition Scheme Department dated 18.08.2010. 2. In the G.O.Ms.No.163 Social Welfare and Nutrition Scheme Department dated 18.08.2010, the qualification prescribed for the ...
P. Maran Vs. the Regional Transport Officer-cum- the Secretary, Region ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent herein to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 23.04.2012, with reference to the Tax amount for the period from 1.04.2012 to 31.03.2013 in D.D.No.001011 dated 3.4.2012 and made a necessary endorsement in the Registration Certificate in respect of the Petitioner's Vehicle No.TN-18-F-1884.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 23.04.2012, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the res...
D. D. Medical College and D. D. Hospital, Rep by Its Chairman Dr. T.D. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in the proceedings No.MCI-34(41)/2012-Med / 112316, dated 19.6.2012 (signed on 18.6.2012) and the further proceedings No.MCI-34(41)/2012-Med, dated 30.06.2012 sent by e-mail and quash the same and consequently to direct the respondent to grant second renewal of permission to the petitioner institution for third batch of MBBS.) 1. This writ petition was filed by the D.D. Medical College and D.D. Hospital, represented by its Chairman. This writ petition was filed to challenge an order of the respondent Medical Council of India (for short MCI), dated 19.06.2012 and further proceedings dated 30.6.2012 sent by e-mail and after setting aside these two orders, seeks for a consequential direction to grant second renewal of permission to the petitioner institution for starting the third batch of M...
M. Saraswathi Vs. the District Collector, District Collectorate Office ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay damages to the petitioner to the tune of Rs.5,00,000/- for the death of her son Prasanth caused by the multiple grievous injuries sustained by him due to collapse of entrance arch of the Valadi Panchayat Office, Trichy.) ORDER 1. Today, a poor and illiterate mother appeared in Court along with her counsel. She has lost her 12 year old son studying in standard VII, in Keelavaladi Government High School, on account of the collapse and fall of an arch/wall of the Panchayat Office. She has claimed compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that on 14.08.2004, about 11.45 a.m., her son was at the library in Valadi Panchayat Office and when he was coming out, the entrance arch/wall of the Panchayat Office collapsed and fell on her minor son Prasanth, which caused multiple injuries and he died on account of the same. It is th...
R.V. Punniakodi Vs. the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to cancel the mortgage deed registered on 03.02.1999 as document No.303/99 on the file of first respondent based on the endorsement made by the finance company dated 20.12.2000 with regard to the petitioner property in S.No.2932/5, an extent of 540 sq.ft. situated at 122/2, New No.190, Varadhammal Thottam 2nd Street, Barraca Road, Kilpauk, Chennai.) ORDER 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to cancel the mortgage deed registered on 03.02.1999 as document No.303/99 on the file of first respondent based on the endorsement made by the finance company dated 20.12.2000 with regard to the petitioner property in S.No.2932/5, an extent of 540 sq.ft. situated at 122/2, New No.190, Varadhammal Thottam 2nd Street, Barraca Road, Kilpauk, Chennai. 2. The nature of the prayer itself makes it clear that the p...
M/S. Sharon Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd, Rep by Its Director and Author ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ in the nature of Certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent and culminating in order No.490/12 dated 12.06.2012 and to quash the same with consequential direction to the first respondent to hear the Appeals preferred by the petitioner herein, on merits without insisting for any pre-deposit as per section 129E of Customs Act.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. The main contention of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that the observation contained in the stay order, dated 12.06.2012, issued by the first respondent/Appellate Tribunal, that the petitioner had offered to make a Pre-deposit of Rs.1 Crore, in addition to the Bank Guarantee, for an amount of Rs.1.80 Crores, is incorrect. Even though the petitioner had stated that he would furnish a Ba...
Srivilliputhur Bar Association Rep. by Its Secretary, T. Rasaiah Vs. t ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pursuant to the impugned order passed by the fifth respondent in Proceedings dated 14.08.2012 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to permit the petitioner Bar Association to conduct a rally and Meeting on 17.08.2012 or any other subsequent date in Srivilliputhur Town, Virudhunagar District as mentioned in the representation dated 13.08.2012.) ORDER 1. The petitioner in this writ petition is Srivilliputhur Bar Association represented by its Secretary. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the fifth respondent namely the Inspector of Police, Krishnankovil Police Station, in charge of Srivilliputhur Town Police Station, Srivilliputhur, dated 14.08.2012. 3. It transpires that the petitioner Bar Association sent a letter dated 13.08.2012 to the fifth respondent asking permission ...
S. Ganesh Ram Vs. the Vice Chancellor, Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical U ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the third respondent (Memorandum, Ex1(4)/07295/2012) dated 14.6.2012 confirming the decision of the second respondent dated 31.5.2012 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to publish the result of the M.B.B.S., final year Part-II examinations held in February, 2012 taken by the petitioner.) 1. Whether the movies like Munna Bhai, MBBS and Vasool Raja, MBBS is based on fact or fiction? The question in this case reflects the story line of the film in which the hero of the film uses a hi-tech device for copying in the examination and get his MBBS degree. The present case also showed that the petitioner and 7 others have used similar techniques for writing their examinations. One of them has come forward to challenge the action initiated by the University in this writ petitio...
G. Sundarraj Vs. Meenakshi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Appeal against the judgement and decree dated 31.1.2008 passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Bhavani, Erode District in O.S.No. 3 of 2005.) 1. This appeal is focussed by the plaintiff in the suit as against the judgement and decree dated 1.1.2008 passed by the Additional istrict udge, Fast Track Court No.4, Bhavani, Erode District in O.S.No. 3 of 2005, which was one for specific performance of an agreement to sell. 2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court. 3. A summation and summarisation of the relevant facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of these appeals, in a few broad strokes can be encapsulated thus: (i) The appellant/plaintiff filed the suit O.S.No.3 of 2005 seeking specific performance based on the agreement to sell-Ex.A1 dated 12.6.1987, purported to have emerged between the plaintiff and the defendant(Meen...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »