Chennai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Inspector General of Police and Others Vs. K. Natarajan (Died) and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer: This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Hon'ble Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Chennai the 2nd Respondent herein relating to orders dated 16.09.2002 made in T.A.No.204/1991 (W.P.No.3585/1983) and quash the same.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Petitioners/Administration have preferred the present Writ of Certiorari in calling for the records of the Second Respondent/Administrative Tribunal pertaining to the orders dated 16.9.2002 in T.A.No.204 of 1991 (W.P.No.3585 of 1983) and to quash the same. 2. The Second Respondent, while passing the orders in T.A.No. 204 of 1991 (W.P.No.3585 of 1983) on 16.09.2002, has, inter alia, observed that 'the evidence against the Applicant (First Respondent) was only to the effect that there has been some delay in writing up the case diary in respect of Cr.No.229 of 1980 and that he has sent petitions directly to the higher officials instead of sending...
R. Shankar Vs. A. Pattabiraman and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the order dated 7.1.2003 made in WC.No.179/2001 by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's compensation-I, Chennai.) 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed at the instance of the claimant and directed against the order dated 7.1.2003 made in WC.No.179/2001 by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's compensation-I, Chennai, whereby a sum of Rs.2,03,318/- was awarded as compensation with a direction to the 2nd Respondent Insurance Company to pay the said amount within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the award, in default, the award amount would carry simple interest at 12 per cent p.a. from the date of the claim petition i.e. 4.6.2001 till the date of realization. 2. The only point taken by Mr. A. Shanmugaraj, the learned counsel for the Appellant is that in view of the provisions contained in Section 4(A)(3) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, it was the duty of the Commissioner to award interest at th...
N. Ramalingam and Another Vs. the Commissioner Prohibition and Excise ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to initiate action against the 3rd respondent for running unlicenced bar under the name of Kavita Bar at No.67 (10-A) Pattakkarar Building Gandiji Road, Erode District based upon the representation of the petitioners', dt. 20.3.2012.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, had stated that the third respondent had submitted a renewal application, dated 29.03.2012, before the second respondent, for the renewal of the FL-3 licence, to run a bar in "Hotel Kavitha" at No.67 (10-A) Pattakkarar Building, Gandhiji Road, Erode District. 3. He had further submitted that the second respondent may be directed to ...
A. Shankar Vs. the District Collector, Thiruvallur District and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondents 1 and 2 herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.12.2011 and 15.02.2012, in seeking to grant permission to the petitioner by extending the period by 3 months to quarry remaining 4025 lorry loads of gravel from the PWD tank situated in S.No.106 of Kannankottai Village, Gummidipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 15.02.2012, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the ...
inox Air Products Ltd. Rep. by Its General Manager M.S.V.K. William Vs ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent to issue Clarification on the petitioner's representations dated 12.01.2012, 14.04.2012 and 25.04.2012.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2 This writ petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent, to issue certain clarifications on the petitioner's representations, dated 12.01.2012, 14.04.2012 and 25.04.2012. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had stated that the respondent has an obligation to issue such clarifications, as prayed for by the petitioner, under Section 37-B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. However, it is seen that Section 37-B of Central Excise Act, 1944, states that the Central Board of Excise and Customs, constituted under the Central Board...
S. Duraisamy Vs. the Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Reg ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer: Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased (1)to grant an order of interim injunction restraining the 3rd respondent from holding the post of President of the 4th respondent society.(2)to vacate the order of interim injunction granted by this Hon'ble Court in MP(MD)No.1/2012 in WP(MD)No.10730/2012 dated.02.08.2012.) ORDER This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. M. RAMALINGAM, Advocate for the petitioner in MP(MD)No.1/12 and 1st Respondent in MP(MD) No.2/12 in WP(MD)No.10730/2012 and of Mr.JEYAKARTHICK, Advocate for the 3rd Respondent in MP(MD)No.1/12 and Petitioner in MP(MD)2/12 in WP(MD)No.10730/2012 respectively, court made the following order:- In the main writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to arrange for an Election of the President/B...
K. Jayaseelan Vs. the Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable End ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent's impugned order in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.4323/2011/Aa2 dated 27.03.2012 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful administration of the Yadhava Trust to conduct temple poojas in Arulmighu Navaneethakrishnan and Chakkarathalvar Thirukkoil, Tallakulam, Madurai city administered by the Yadhava Trust and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the above circumstances.) ORDER In this Writ Petition, the petitioner is one K.Jayaselan S/o A.Krishnankonar. The petitioner seeks to challenge the order passed by the third respondent, the Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department in short, HR and CE Department dated 27.03.2012. After setting aside the same, seeks for a direction to the respo...
Ramesh Kumar R.Chaturvedi Vs. Inspector of Police All Women Police Sta ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer: Revision Case filed u/s.397 and 401 Cr.P.C., against the order dated 15.03.2012 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Coimbatore, in C.M.P.No.543/2012 in C.C No.62/2012.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has come forward with this Criminal Revision Case, challenging the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate-III, Coimbatore, dated 15.03.2012 made in C.M.P.No.543/2012 in C.C. No.62/2012, refusing to return the passport of the petitioner. 2. Mr.C.D.Sugumar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been implicated for the alleged offence u/s.498-A IPC in C.C.No.62/2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-III, Coimbatore. According to the petitioner, though, the petitioner was born in India, he has now become a citizen of United States of America (USA) and he has got USA passport and he was given Indian VISA only to visit the country, which is valid upto the year 2017. Further, according to the VISA Rules, from the date of entry into ...
N. Syamala Devi and Others Vs. Dr. Geetha Hari Priya @ Geetha Gopalasw ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
R.SUBBIAH, J., 1. This is an application filed by defendants 1 to 6 to revoke the leave granted in A.No.1597 of 2011 dated 16.03.2011 to sue the defendants in the suit. 2. The respondents herein are the plaintiffs and they filed the suit for the following reliefs: (i) to frame a scheme in terms of section 92 of C.P.C.permitting the Trust, namely, Maruthi Educational Trust having its office at Plot No.Q 100 A, MMDA Colony, Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 106 to run the school including Maruthi Matriculation School consisting of the trustees and other eminent persons in the field of education having experience and expertise in running the trust and to fulfil the objects as envisaged under the deed of trust dated 25.09.1996 registered as Doc.No.285 of 1996 on the file of SRO., Kodambakkam; (ii) to remove defendants 1 and 2 as trustees from the Maruthi Educational Trust; (iii) to render accounts and expenditure for the Maruthi Educational Trust from 2005 to till date; (iv) to declare the lease dee...
S. Shiva Vs. the State Transport Authority Chepauk and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents and their subordinates to receive tax for Tamil Nadu for seven days or thirty days or ninety days as tendered voluntarily in advance by petitioner, for using vehicle bearing Registration No KA 51 A 4760 in Tamil Nadu.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the issues involved in this writ petition are covered by the order of this Court, dated 24.4.2007 made in W.P.Nos.15061 to 15063 of 2007, and the order , dated 27.04.2011, passed in W.P.No.11095 of 2011, wherein, this Court had directed the respondents therein to receive the tax, as and when it is voluntarily tendered, by the petitioners therein, in advance, for 7 days, 30 days or 90 days...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »