Chennai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Bluemax Impex (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs ( ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to provisionally assess and release the goods under import, iz.,CARLVO Dual Sim Chinese Cellular Phone, covered under Bill of Entry No.5256566 dated 22.11.11 in terms of Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, read with Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment Regultions) 1963.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. It has been stated that the petitioner had imported CARLVO Dual Sim Chinese Cellular Phones, under Bill of Entry No.5256566, dated 22.11.2011. The petitioner has been issued with the importer and exporter code, bearing No.0909021937, by the office of the Zonal Joint Directorate General of Foreign Trade, Hyderabad. 3. It has been further stated that the petitioner had declared the value of the goods imported by it, at Rs.2,06,16,882/-, for the purpose of assessme...
P.S. Rengarajan Vs. K.G. Pandurangan and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed against the order, dated 03.07.2012 made in C.M.P.Sr.No.58572 of 2011 in A.S.No.286 of 2011 on the file of the III Additional Judge, City Civil Judge, Chennai.) 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent. 2. This Civil Revision has been preferred challenging the order, dated 03.07.2012 made in C.M.P.Sr.No.58572 of 2011 in A.S.No.286 of 2011 on the file of the III Additional Judge, City Civil Judge, Chennai. 3. It is seen that the unnumbered C.M.P in C.M.P.Sr.No.58572 of 2011 in A.S.No.286 of 2011 was filed by the petitioner herein under Order XVIII Rule 18 CPC, seeking the appellate Judge of the Court below to inspect the suit property and other properties for ascertaining the correct position and existence in Adyar Apartments at Kottur Gardens by way of local spot inspection by the learned Judge of the Court below. 4. It is an admitted fact that originally an Advocat...
M/S. Swastik Enterprises, Rep. by Its Proprietor Paras Vs. the Commiss ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to release the goods viz., 1610 kgs of stone cutting tools (un-branded), imported vide Bill of Entry No.6383677, dated 28.3.2012, on the value declared by the petitioner at USD 4427.50 (CandF), Chennai, totally.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. It has been stated that the petitioner had imported 1610 kilograms of Stone Cutting Tools (Unbranded), from China, at USD 4427.50. The said goods had been shipped from M/s.Guangzhou Sunshine Lighting Company Limited, China, vide invoice No.RCF-120223-14, dated 23.2.2012. A Bill of Entry No.6383677, dated 28.3.2012, had been filed, by the petitioner, for the release of the goods in question, for home consumption. 3. It had been further stated that the authorities concerned had examined the goods and had found them to be in...
K. Dharmalingam Vs. the Labour Court, Rep. by Its Presiding Officer, C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the Award dated 14.03.2011 in C.P.No.397 of 2006 of the first respondent and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and perverse and consequently direct the second respondent to pay the wages due to the petitioner with penal interest and all other attendant benefits.) ORDER 1. The petitioner was an employee of the second respondent Co-operative Society. He retired from service on 31.10.2004. A sum of Rs.86,000/- was deducted from the salary of the petitioner from August 2003 to October 2004 i.e., till he retired from service. 2. The petitioner filed a claim petition in C.P.No.397 of 2006 before the first respondent-Labour Court under section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 claiming the aforesaid amount. 3. The second respondent-Management took a plea that the second respondent incurred loss in running a liquor ...
M/S. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Rep. by Its Manager Vs. Mahaveer Chand D ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Appeal against the fair and decretal order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 15.02.2012 in O.P.No.678 of 2010.) P. Devadass, J. The first respondent, namely, Kotak Mahendra Bank Ltd., Chennai, in O.P.No.678 of 2010, aggrieved by the Fair Order and Decretal Order of the learned Single Judge dated 15.02.2012 setting aside the Arbitrator's award dated 04.05.2010, has directed this Original Side Appeal. 2. Let us notice the circumstances that led to the filing of this intra-Court Appeal. 3. Appellant is a Banking Company. It gives various kinds of loans. One of it is Property Loan. It is also known as Home Finance. On 29.12.2005, Respondents 1 to 6 (petitioners 1 to 6 in O.P.No.678 of 2010) were sanctioned a property loan of Rs.51 Lakhs. There are two modes of charging the interest. One is, fixed interest. The other one is, adjustable interest rate (AIR). However, there is concession of 1%. Under the second mode, the interest will remain fixed for 12 quarters, namely, for 3...
M. Poominathan Vs. the State Election Commissioner, Koimbedu and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order in proceedings e.f.m3 /1118/11 dated 14.05.2012 and to quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to direct the respondents to conduct the fresh enquiry as per the direction of this Court.) ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner who is a ward member of T.Punaivasal Village Panchayat, Kamuthi Panchayat Union, Ramanathapuram District, seeks to set aside the impugned order, dated 14.05.2012, passed by the Returning Officer, Kamuthi. 2. The said impugned notification was issued on the basis of the communication received from the State Election Commissioner, dated 11.05.2012 and a direction was issued to conduct election in respect of the vacant posts on 22.05.2012. Hence, the members of the panchayat are informed about the election. 3. The petitioner on receipt of the said impugned...
City Municipal Corporation of Chennai Rep. by Its Commissioner 'Ripon ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules r/w Order VII Rule 1 of CPC a) to direct the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.1,02,90,626/- together with further interest at the rate of 24% p.a compounded monthly; b) to direct the defendant to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff and c) to grant such other further or other reliefs in favour of the plaintiff as this Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.) JUDGMENT The civil suit has been filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules r/w Order VII Rule 1 of CPC for recovery of money, cost of the suit and for other reliefs as this Hon'ble may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. The averments found in the plaint, in brief, are as follows: For the grant of licence (right) to display advertisement over lamp posts in 10 important roads in the city of Chennai for the years 1996 - 1999 auction-cum-tender procedure was followed and the defendant emerged as the successful bidder having offered the highest ...
S. Murugan Vs. the Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer in W.P.No.15617 of 2011: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to call for the records and quash the order of the 2nd respondent in R.No. 2005/A1/ 2011 dated 27.06.2011 and to direct the respondents to issue a Training Certificate to the petitioner.) Common Order 1. This judgment shall dispose of the following writ petitions, viz., ad>Case No.Name of the Petitioners / Month and Year of Completion of B.Sc.Applied ChemistryRelief ClaimedW.P.No.15617 of 2011S.Murugan / May, 2009To call for the records and quash the order of the 2nd respondent in R.No. 2005/A1/ 2011 dated 27.06.2011 and to direct the respondents to issue a Training Certificate to the petitioner.W.P.No.15618 of 2011C.Veeran / May, 2009To call for the records and quash the order of the 2nd respondent in R.No.2005/A1/ 2011 dated 27.6.2011 and directing the respondents to issue a Training Certificat...
Rajeswari Vs. the Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents herein to permit the petitioner's husband Yohavasudevan, son of Yoharengaraj, now detained in Central Prison, Madurai concerned in Cr.No.96 of 2008 on the file of the fourth respondent, to participate in the Aruppukottai Panchayat Union Council Meeting scheduled on 24.08.2012 at 11.00 a.m.) ORDER 1. The petitioner is the wife of one Yohavasudevan. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to permit her husband Yohavasudevan who is now detained in the Central Prison, in connection with Cr.No.96 of 2008 registered by the Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Police Station - the fourth respondent, to participate in the Aruppukottai Panchayat Union Council Meeting scheduled to take place on 24.08.2012 at 11.00 a.m. 2. It is stated by the petitioner that the fourth respondent - the Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Police Station, had...
The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, High Cou ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
(Prayer:This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the impugned proceedings of the 5th respondent in O.M.No.873/Sec.-I(2)/2012-1, dated 6.7.2012 and the letter dated 10.7.2012 of the fifth respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to provide adequate security to the Members of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench without any further reviews.) 1. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench (hereinafter referred to as 'CAT') has filed this writ petition with a prayer to quash the order of the 5th respondent dated 10.7.2012 withdrawing the two Personal Security Officers and four Armed Guards, provided for B.Venkateswara Rao, Member of the CAT, with immediate effect and withdrawing two Personal Security Officers already provided for G.Shantappa, Judicial Member and HOD, CAT and for a direction to respondents 1 to 5 to pr...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »