Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T. Palani Vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd., Chengalpattu, Rep b ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
(The appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 29.6.2012, upon hearing the arguments of both sides and perused the documents, written submissions as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following order :-) A.K.ANNAMALAI, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. 2. The complainant insured his residential building with compound wall as insurance coverage for Rs. 7 lakh with the opposite party and during the force of policy on 3.5.2004, the compound wall of complainants house fell down due to heavy rain and wind and also due to fast current of flood water and the complainant had to spent Rs. 39,715/- for the construction of the compound wall towards reconstruction of the same. Hence he claimed the same from the opposite party which was repudiated on the ground that the compound wall was not covered under the terms of policy. Hence the complainant came forward to file consumer complaint claiming a payment of Rs. 39,715/ -...
A.Ramasamy. Vs. the Commissioner of Agriculture
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
PRAYER in both writ petitions Writ petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to refix the Selection Grade and Special Grade Scale of Pay as indicated in Schedule-II of the Tamil Nadu Revised Scales of Pay Rules 1998, at Rs.5000-150-8000 and 5500-175-9000 respectively to the petitioner driver with all consequential monetary benefits and to pay all arrears with effect from 01.01.1996 within a stipulated time period.COMMON ORDER1. In view of the direction sought for in the writ petitions, the Secretary to Government, Department of Agriculture, Secretariat, Chennai, is suomotu impleaded as fourth respondent.2. The petitioners are working as Drivers in the fourth respondent department. The date of entry into service, the date of grant of Selection Grade, the date of grant of Special Grade and the date of retirement in service of the petitioners are given below: Sl. Name of the Date of entry date of gr...
Om Sri Vivekananda Educational Trust. Vs. the All India Council for Te ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent relating to its letter of Rejection issued in F.No.Southern/2012/1-753634034-LOR, dated 06.04.2012 and F.No.Southern/2012/1-753634034-LOR dated 16.05.2012 and quash the same and to direct the first respondent to reconsider the application of the petitioner for establishment of AVS School of Engineering and Technology at Attur Main Road, Chinnagoundapuram, Salem-636 106 for the academic year 2012-13 subject to production of building plan approval by the petitioner.K.CHANDRU, J.ORDER1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner Educational Trust seeking to challenge the letters of rejection, dated 6.4.2012 as well as 16.05.2012 and after setting aside the same seeks for a direction to re-consider their application for establishment of AVS School of Engineering and Technology at Attur Main Road, Chinnag...
The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. Vs.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as against the award and decree dated 29.11.2004 made in MCOP.No.130 of 2004 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Addl. Sub Judge), Cuddalore.R. KARUPPIAH, J.JUDGMENT1. The appellant/respondent-Transport Corporation has filed this civil miscellaneous appeal as against the award and decree dated 29.11.2004 made in MCOP.No.130 of 2004 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Addl. Sub Judge), Cuddalore.2. The respondent/petitioner has filed claim petition before the Tribunal for compensation of Rs.5 lakhs for the injuries sustained by him in motor accident occurred on 30.9.2003. Briefly, the case of the respondent/petitioner is that on 30.9.2003 at about 12.15 pm, while the petitioner along with his friends was walking with moto...
Elumalai Gounder. Vs. Bala Ganapathy Mudaliar.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decree made in I.A.No.255 of 2009 in I.A.No.292 of 2008 in unnumbered C.M.A.No. Of 2009 dated 19.11.2009 by the Principal District Judge, Villupuram.O R D E R1. The Petitioner/Appellant has focussed the instant Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 19.11.2009 in I.A.No.255 of 2009 in unnumbered C.M.A.No. Of 2009 passed by the Learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram for condonation of delay of 49 days in filing the application as per Order 9 Rule 9 of Civil Procedure Code.2. The Learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram, while passing order in I.A.No.255 of 2009 in unnumbered C.M.A.No. Of 2009 on 19.11.2009, has among other things, observed that '.... when I.A.No.292 of 2008 was adjourned for an enquiry, no one appeared on the side of the Petitioner and viewed in that perspective, the Petitioner/Defendant was acting with a view not to proceed with the original suit bef...
Aiyadurai. Vs. Balaiyah
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
Civil Revision Petition filed against the judgment and Decree dated 30.9.2009 passed in C.M.A. No.4 of 2008 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Chidambaram.O R D E R1. Anim adverting upon the judgment and decree dated 30.9.2009 in C.M.A. No.4 of 2008 passed by the learned Sub Judge, Chidambaram in confirming the order dated 20.6.2008 in I.A. No.42 of 2008 in O.S. No.25 of 2003 passed by the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Port Novo, the Revision petitioners/defendants 1 to 3 have focussed the present civil revision petition.2. The First Appellate Court, viz. learned Sub Judge, Chidambaram, while passing the judgment in C.M.A. No.4 of 2008 on 30.9.2009, has among other things, observed that no endeavour was made on the side of the Appellants (revision petitioners/defendants) to cross-examine the witness P.W.1/Balaiya and further cross-examination of P.W.1 was not done and added further not a single appellant had appeared before the Court to conduct the proceeding in O...
E.Srinivasan. Vs. the Special Deputy Collector (La)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
Writ Petition No.17929 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Public Notice dated 30.07.2010 issued by the respondent in Dhinathanthi dated 06.08.2010 and Award No.4 of 2012 dated 15.05.2012 issued by the respondent and communicated under proceeding bearing Na.Ka.563/2010/A1 dated 15.05.2012 and quash the same.Writ Petition No.17930 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.563/2010/A1 dated 30.07.2011 and Award No.4 of 2012 dated 15.05.2012 passed by the respondent and communicated under bearing Na.Ka.563/2010/A1 dated 15.05.2012 and quash the same.COMMON ORDER1. Writ Petition No.17929 of 2012 is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Public Notice dated 30.07.2010 issued by the respondent in Dhin...
Pulavar Palanisamy and ors. Vs. State Represented by the Additional Su ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
PRAYER Criminal Revisions filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order of dismissal dated dated 30th July 2010, made by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur in Cr.M.P.Nos.798, 2747, 275, 2554, 4104, 829, 1543, 4108, 2371, 4106, 2746, 2132, 1217 and 830 of 2007 respectively in S.C.No.275 of 2006.COMMON ORDER "Actus non facit reum, nisi mens rea "- "The act itself does not constitute guilt unless done with a guilty intent."1. The case of the prosecution is that a complaint has been lodged by the Village Administrative Officer, at 12.00 Noon on 16.07.2004 to the East Police Station, Kumbakonam, stating that at 11.00 A.M. on 16.07.2004, at the premises of three schools namely Sri Krishna Aided Primary School, Saraswathi Nursery School and Primary School and Sri Krishna Girls High School, at Kumbakonam, the fire spread over from the kitchen thatched shed to the first floor thatched shed of the class rooms and in the said fire more than 100 children died and ...
S.Sripathi. Vs.The Director of Matriculation Schools, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to provide admission for the petitioner S.Sripathi in IX Standard-1st group in the third respondent school within the time frame fixed by the court.K.CHANDRU, J.ORDER1. The petitioner, who is a minor represented by his father, a resident of Idayarpalayam, Coimbatore, has filed the present writ petition seeking for a direction to provide admission to him in the 11th standard - First group in the third respondent school within a time frame as may be fixed by the court.2.When the mater came up on 28.06.2012, this court directed the learned Additional Government Pleader (Education) Mr.Sanjay Gandhi to take notice for respondents 1 and 2. In respect of third respondent private school, a private notice was directed to be served. Accordingly, private notice was served. On notice the third respondent has filed a detailed counter affidavit da...
Subha Charles. Vs. the Tamilnadu Dr.Mgr Medical University, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.07.2004 by appointing an Expert Committee to scrutinise the papers relating to Neurology with Applied Biochemistry, Psychiatry Incl. Mental Health and Psychiatry Including Child Psychiatry and also relating to clinical and oral examination conducted in April 2004.S.MANIKUMAR, J.ORDER1. The prayer sought for in this writ petition is for a mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.07.2004 by appointing an Expert Committee to scrutinise the papers relating to Neurology with Applied Biochemistry, Psychiatry Incl. Mental Health and Psychiatry Including Child Psychiatry and also relating to clinical and oral examination conducted in April 2004. 2. Eight years have lapsed since the date of filing of the writ petition. The Course itsel...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »