Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Muthaiah, and anr. Vs. the Special Tahsildar,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to furnish Notification issued under Section 4(1), if any, and any further notifications, Award passed for the property, if any, all other documents and notices and notifications, relating to the acquisition of the property above mentioned.R.SUDHAKAR, J.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to furnish Notification issued under Section 4(1), if any, and any further notifications, Award passed for the property, if any, all other documents and notices and notifications, relating to the acquisition of the property above mentioned.2. Ms.V.M.Velumani, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. In respect of the relief sought for by the petitioners as above, learned Special...
C.Thangappan. Vs. Dr.R.S.Lalmohan and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
Review filed under Order 47, Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order of this Court dated 28.02.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.1205 of 2012.ORDERR.BANUMATHI, J1. Review Petitioner seeks to review the order dated 28.2.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.1205 of 2012 on the ground that the said order came to be passed without looking into the materials produced by the Review Petitioner and also without hearing the Review Petitioner.2. Background Facts:(i) Andarkulam Tank is situated in Survey No.584/1 of Therur Village, Agasteeswaram Taluk of Kanyakumari District and the total area of the said tank is 41.94 acres. The tank is said to receive its water from Pechiparai Dam and also from rain catchment area. Tank supplies water to an ayacut of 250 acres. It is stated to be catering to the needs of ayacutdars and surrounding villages.(ii) First respondent filed public interest litigation alleging that Review Petitioner encroached into the Tank and putting up constructi...
J.Nayagam. Vs. the Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant electricity service connection to the petitioner pursuant to her application dated 20.04.2012 in respect of the premises bearing No.5/252, Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Canalpuram, Palavakkam, Chennai 41, within a time limit fixed by this Court.R.SUDHAKAR, J.ORDER1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant electricity service connection to the petitioner pursuant to her application dated 20.04.2012 in respect of the premises bearing No.5/252, Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Canalpuram, Palavakkam, Chennai 41, within a time limit fixed by this Court.2. Mr.P.Gunaraj, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. The writ petition is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents stating that there is a civil suit pe...
P.Suresh Kumar. Vs. the Member Secretary, All India Council for Techni ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of declaration , to declare that prescribing the minimum eligibility criteria as Mathematics at 10 +2 level for M.C.A. Admission by the first respondent as Ultravvires, violative of Article 14 and 19 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the second respondent to permit the petitioner to appear for the TANCET Examination scheduled on 30.03.2012.K.SHARMA, J.ORDER1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for the issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the minimum eligibility criteria as Mathematics at 10 +2 level for MCA admission by the first respondent as ultravires the Constitutioni, being violative of Articles 14 and 19 of Constitution of India, with a consequential prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to appear for the TANCET examination scheduled on 3...
Gopaldas, and ors. Vs. Y.J.Shamshudeen, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
Civil Revision Petitions filed under section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, as against the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2012 of the Rent Control Appellate Authority viz., VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in RCA Nos.523 and 522 of 2010 confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 21.07.2010 of the Rent Controller of the XVI Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras in RCOP No.2093 of 2009.G.RAJASURIA, J.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2012 passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority viz., VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in RCA Nos.523 and 522 of 2010 confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 21.07.2010 passed by the Rent Controller, XVI Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras in RCOP No.2093 of 2009, these civil revisions petitions are focussed.2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the learned Rent Controller.3. A summation and summarisation of ...
R.Vinodkumar. Vs. the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose of the Petitioner's application dated 2.3.2010 and direct the third respondent to regularise the Petitioner's plot under innocent Buyers category pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.565 ULC/Rev Department dated 26.09.2008. (The prayer in this writ petition was amended as per order dated 16.7.2012 passed in M.P.No.1 of 2012).R.SUDHAKAR, J.ORDER1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose of the Petitioner's application dated 2.3.2010 and direct the third respondent to regularise the Petitioner's plot under innocent Buyers category pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.565 ULC/Rev Department dated 26.09.2008.2. Ms.V.M.Velumani, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the writ petition is...
P.Manivannan. Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniform Services.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
PRAYER Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 21.06.2012 made in W.P.(MD)No.8473 of 2009 on the file of this Court.JUDGMENT R.BANUMATHI,J1. Challenging the order passed in W.P. (MD) No.8473 of 2012 dated 21.06.2012, Appellant has preferred this appeal.2. In the Writ Petition, Appellant has sought for Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to scrutinize the Application No.133975 submitted by the Appellant on 29.03.2012 and also directed the Respondents to allow the Appellant to participate in the Physical Test, Medical Test and Interview.3. When the Writ Appeal is taken up today, Mr.K.Chellapandian, learned Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr.K.P.Krishna Doss, learned Government Advocate takes notice for Respondents. Learned Additional Advocate General submitted that the Physical Test, Medical Test and Interview for the Post of Grade-I Constable is already over.4. In such view of the matter, nothing survives for consideration in this Appe...
K.Jeyachandran.Vs. the Secretary to the Government, Revenue Department ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
Prayer: O.A.No.2466 of 2002 is filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal seeking for the relief of calling for the records of the respondent in connection with the impugned show cause notice passed by him in Lr.No.43198/Pani/7-II/2001-4 Dated 27.02.2002 and quash the same.On abolition of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, O.A.No.2466 of 2002 was transferred to this Court and re-numbered as Writ Petition.VINOD K. SHARMA, J.ORDER1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, to quash the show cause notice dated 27.2.2002 issued by the respondent in exercise of suo motu power under Rule 36 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955. 2. Rule 36 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955 reads as under:"36. Revision.(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules-(i) the State Government; or(ii) the Head of the Department directly under the State Gover...
Annapoorani. Vs. Janakiammal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
Civil revision petition preferred against the order dated 24.8.2011 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Coimbatore in E.A.No.29 of 2011 in E.P.No.161 of 1990.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the order dated 24.8.2011 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Coimbatore in E.A.No.29 of 2011 in E.P.No.161 of 1990, this civil revision petition is filed.2. The parties, for the sake of convenience are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.3. A thumbnail sketch of the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this civil revision petition would run thus:(i) E.P.No.161 of 1990 was filed by the original plaintiff/decree holder as against the original defendant/judgement debtor and the immovable property belonging to the judgement debtor was attached.(ii) It appears, the judgement debtor/Janakiammal died pending the E.P.and after her death, her L.Rs filed E.A.No.29 of 2011 under Order XXI Rule 57 and Section 151 of CPC to raise t...
S.Raju. Vs. the Joint Director Collegiate Education.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
PRAYER Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in the order in Na.Ka.No.6011-B1-2005 dated 16.03.2006 and quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to continue the payment of 5% personal pay hitherto paid by the respondents.ORDER1. The first petitioner was appointed on 01.08.1976 as Lab Assistant. He was promoted as Junior Assistant on 01.09.1982. The second petitioner was appointed as Lab Assistant on 17.07.1971 and he was promoted as Store Keeper on 13.11.1982. Junior Assistants and Store Keepers belong to the same category.2. The petitioners were granted 5% personal pay from 01.09.1998, based on G.O.No.664, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 24.08.1992. However, the first respondent passed the order dated 16.03.2006, cancelling the grant of personal pay with effect from 01.09.1998. As per the impugned order, the order is based on the order dated 13.02....
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »