Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.Ramachandran. Vs. the Secretary to Government, Commercial Tax Depa
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the respondent passed in G.O.Ms.No.89, Commercial Tax (H1) Department dated 27.04.2004 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to regularize the period of suspension as duty with all pensionary, retirement and monetary benefits with cost.O R D E R1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order of removal from service passed vide G.O.Ms.No.89, Commercial Tax (H1) Department dated 27.04.2004.2. The petitioner joined the service on 05.06.1965 as Section Writer in the Registration Department and retired as District Registrar (Audit), Central Madras on 28.02.2003.3. The petitioner was transferred from Valipandapuram to Panrutti as Sub-Registrar, by way of mutual transfer, but the transfer was subsequently cancelled. The petitioner chal...
N.A.A.Vijayarani Sakunthala Esther. Vs. the Chief Educational Officer ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
PRAYER Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 22.1.2011 passed in W.P.(MD)No.11829 of 2010 on the file of this Court.JUDGMENT R.BANUMATHI, J1. This Writ Appeal arises out of the order in W.P.(MD)No.11829 of 2010 (dated 22.1.2011), whereby the Writ Court dismissed the Writ Petition declining to interfere with the transfer of the appellant from fifth respondent School - Cathedral Higher Secondary School, Palayamkottai to sixth respondent School - West Tirunelveli Higher Secondary school, Nalloor.2. The appellant was working as Drawing Master and also she was holding the post of Assistant Headmistress in the fifth respondent School - Cathedral Higher Secondary School, Palayamkottai. By order dated 6.9.2010, the appellant was transferred from fifth respondent School - Cathedral Higher Secondary School, Palayamkottai to sixth respondent School - West Tirunelveli Higher Secondary school, Nalloor, on being recommended by the Standing Committee for high...
D.Murali. Vs. S.Kanagaraj and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
First appeal filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree dated 10.05.2011 in O.S.No.10151 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Chennai.J U D G M E N T1. Suit is filed for delivery of vacant possession and for costs.2. The following are the brief allegations contained in the plaint -2 [A] The plaintiff is the owner of the suit schedule mentioned property by virtue of the registered sale dated 30.04.2007. Prior to 1946, the property mentioned in the schedule alongwith other properties were in joint occupation of the heirs of Ponnusamy Sah by a partition deed dated 07.02.1946 registered as document No.382/1946. The parties to the deed are Abibu N./S.Kiddrai. Abibu Rajaram Sah, Abibu K.Narayana Sah, Abibu G.Askaapathy, Abibu G.Vasu, Abibu P.Krishna Sah, Abibu P.Lakshmi Narayana Sah, Lakshmi Bai, Heera Bai and Minor Seenu partitioned the joint family property and have taken their respective separate shar...
Bharathi Mohan. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
Prayer.:- Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the Judgment dated 31.08.2007 made in S.C.No.414 of 2006 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Chengalpet.J U D G M E N T1. The appeal arises out of the Judgment of conviction and sentence dated 31.08.2007 made in S.C.No.414 of 2006 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Chengalpet, whereby, the accused was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 336-A, 376 and 506(ii) IPC; for the offence under Section 366-A, sentenced to undergo 3 years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default, to undergo 6 months Rigorous Imprisonment; for the offence under Section 376 IPC, sentenced to undergo 10 years Rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default, to undergo six months Rigorous Imprisonment; for the offence under Section 506(ii) IPC, to undergo 3 years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs....
Mr.A.R.Rajasekaran . Vs. State Represented by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
Criminal Appeals filed against the Judgment of the learned II Additional District Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Coimbatore in C.C.No.3 of 2000 dated 27.08.2003.COMMON JUDGMENT1. The appellants herein are the accused 1 and 2 in C.C.No.3 of 2000, on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge and Special Judge (CBI Cases), Coimbatore. The accused 1 and 2 were convicted for the offences under Sections 120-B r/w 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and each one of them sentenced to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- in default to undergo one month rigorous imprisonment. The first accused was further convicted for the offence under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- in default to undergo two months rigorous imprisonment. The second accused was further convicted for the offe...
Ganapathy. Vs. the District Collector, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to appoint the petitioner as Village Education Committee of the Government High School, Kothakottai, who being the Village Panchayat President of the Kothakottai Village Panchayat, as per the G.O.Ms.No.53, dated 26-04-2002 and G.O.Ms.No.108, dated 31-07-2003.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent.2. At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the first respondent, with regard to the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition and if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent has no objection for thi...
V.Pandi and ors. Vs. M.Thyagarajan and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
COMMON ORDER1. While C.R.P.PD.Nos.2317,2318 and 2319 of 2012 are filed against the orders of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore, dated 27.02.2012, passed in I.A.Nos.2414 of 2011,113 and 208 of 2012 respectively in O.S.No.615 of 2010, rejecting the prayer of the petitioners to direct the Official Receiver to take possession of the suit trade union's properties situated at Udumalpet and Tiruppur, and to adjourn the suits till the Official Receiver takes possession of the entire properties of the suit Sangam, C.R.P.PD.No.2320 of 2012 is filed against the order of even date passed in I.A.No.209 of 2012 in O.S.No.228 of 2010 on the file of the same Court, in and by which the prayer to send the documents, namely, the election notice Ex.B-45, along with the documents which are marked as Exs.A1,A2,A5,A16,A21,A24 to A26,B2,B10 to B27, B31,B40,B41 and the admitted signatures of Duraisamy, 2nd plaintiff-PW1, contained in the vakalath, written statement, additional written statement, affidav...
Rajappa (Deceased) by Legal Representatives. Vs. R.Aynandurai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
Civil revision petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 as amended by Act 23/73 and 1 of 1980 against the judgment and decree dated 14.11.2011 passed by the learned VIII Judge Court of Small Causes, Chennai in R.C.A.No.261 of 2010 in confirming the order and decree dated 02.03.2010 passed by the learned XI Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in RCOP No.2775 of 2008.ORDER1. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner made the following endorsement:"The petitioners settled the dispute by vacating the premises. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose the CRP as not pressed."(extracted as such)In view of the above, this civil revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
M. Mohan. Vs. the Commissioner of Tiruchirapalli
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-17-2012
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.37895/91/C3 Centre dated 21/6/2007, quash the same in so far as denying back wages for the period suspension from 11/2/1991 till 21/2/2000 and consequently direct the respondent to pay backwages to the petitioner for the period from 11/12/1991 till 21/2/2000 together with continuity of service including periodical increments and all other attendant benefits.ORDER1. The short question that arises for consideration is as to whether the petitioner would be deprived of the wages for the period of suspension, when the respondent regularised the period of suspension, particularly the criminal action was dropped and there was no punishment in the departmental proceeding.2. The petitioner is a Male Nursing Assistant employed by the respondent from 30/10/1982.3. On 17/9/1991, he was...
N. Rasulatheen. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-17-2012
W.P.Nos.7587, 7588 of 2007: Writ Petitions filed under under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order passed by the second respondent in his Proceedings Ref.No.7622/E/(1)/2002 dated 26.4.2002 and consequential order passed by the third respondent in his Proceedings O.O.No.4/A1/2002 dated 29.4.2002 and quash both of them as illegal and against the principles of natural justice.W.P.Nos.7589 of 2007: Writ Petitions filed under under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order passed by the second respondent in his Proceedings Ref.No.7622/E/(1)/2002 dated 26.4.2002 and consequential order passed by the third respondent in Ref No.1889/Z-III/A1/02 dated 29.4.2002 and quash the same.W.P.No.7590 of 2007: Writ Petitions filed under under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »