Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Malarvizhi. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to sponsor the petitioner's name for selection to the post of Assistant Engineer in Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board through Written Examination scheduled to be held on 25.11.2006 and further, directing the first respondent to permit her to attend the Written Examination for the said post.O R D E R1. The petitioner has filed the Writ of Mandamus praying for an issuance of an order by this Court in directing the third respondent in sponsoring her name for selection to the post of Assistant Engineer in the second respondent office/Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board through Written Examination scheduled to be held on 25.11.2006. Further, the petitioner has sought for passing of an order directing the first respondent to permit her to attend the written examination for the said post.2. The Learned Cou...
C.Ayyammal Vs. the Secretary to Government and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to issue house site patta to the petitioner and all other beneficiaries from the lands comprised in S.No.344/p Vilankurichi Village, Coimbatore District which was acquired for the above purpose in G.O.Ms.No.679 dated 22.09.1992.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to issue house site pattas to the petitioner and to all the other beneficiaries, in respect of the lands in S.No.344/p, Vilankurichi Village, Coimbatore District, which had been acquired by way of a Government Order, in G.O.Ms.No.679 (Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department), dated 22.09.1992.2. At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the third respondent, wherein it has been stated that this Court had passed orders, in similar matters, directing the authority co...
K.S.M.Aminath SharifA. Vs. the Collector, Office of the District Reven ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, for the relief as stated therein.O R D E R1. The petitioner has filed the present Writ of Mandamus praying for issuance of an order by this Court in directing the respondents to pass an order of refunding the stamp paper amount of Rs.1,55,000/- to her.2. According to the petitioner, she purchased stamp papers for Rs.1,55,000/- from Stamp Vendor, P.M.Srinivasan, L.No.D2/26393/ 75, 33rd Division, Chennai-600 007. The details of the stamp papers purchased showing the denomination etc. run as follows:-3. It is the stand of the petitioner that the vendor has not co-operated with her in regard to sale of a property to her and therefore, the proposed purchase between her and the vendor got cancelled. Hence, the petitioner approached the stamp vendor, who has given a certificate addressed to the second respondent and also directed to get refund from the respondents. She s...
Minor Mohanapriya Vs. the Branch Manager United India Insurance Co.Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and final order passed in I.A.No.166 of 2011 in MCOP No.315 of 2007 dated 08.04.2011 on the file of the MACT/FAST TRACK COURT NO.2 at Gobichettipalayam.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the order dated 08.04.2011 passed in I.A.No.166 of 2011 in MCOP No.315 of 2007 by the MACT/FAST TRACK COURT No.2 at Gobichettipalayam., this civil revision petition is focussed.2. Heard both sides.3. The germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this revision petition would run thus:The revision petitioner represented by his next friend Father Appaiyan filed I.A.No.166 of 2011 for withdrawal of a sum of Rs.1,03,214/- on the ground that the minor Mohanapriya requires the amount for educational and medical expenses. However, the lower Court ordered only 25% of the accrued interest to be released.4. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the said order, this revision has been filed on various grounds.5. Th...
Al.Nallusamy. Vs. K.Jagan Mohan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Prayer: These Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Building (Lease and Rent) Control Act, against the order and decreetal order dated 06.09.2007 made in R.C.A.No.931/2006 on the file of VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai confirming the order and decreetal order dated 31.07.2006 made in RCOP No.29/2005 on the file of X Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.O R D E R1. This revision is directed against the fair and decreetal order passed by the RCAA in RCA No.931/2006 dated 06.09.2007 in confirming the order of the learned Rent Controller passed in RCOP No.29/05 dated 31.07.2006 in fixing the fair rent for the demised premises at Rs.18,133/- per month from the date of the said petition.2. The petitioner was the respondent/tenant and respondent herein was the petitioner/landlord before the learned Rent Controller.3. The case of the petitioner before the learned Rent Controller would be as follows:-The property bearing Old Door No.31, New Door No.59, 48th St...
Mrs.Ayyammal. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents either to pay the Compensation as per the guideline value fixed by the Government of a sum of Rs.28,13,900/- or to restore the land in Old Survey No.190/3, New Survey No.190/3C, to the extent of 0.34 acres in Annadhanapatti, Manianur Village, Salem District to the petitioner.O R D E R1. The petitioner purchased the land in Old Survey No.190/3, New Survey No.190/3C in Manianur, Annadhanaapatti Village measuring 0.34 acre. In pursuance to the purchase, the petitioner was put in possession and is in enjoyment of the land, as the absolute owner along with her sons and daughters.2. The petitioner has four sons and four daughters, who are all married. It is claimed by petitioner, that all his sons and daughters have interest in this property. This averment is based on no evidence, showing the propoerty to be ancestral or any document transferring...
The Gobichettipalayam Association Rep. Vs. the Bar Council of Tamilnad ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in Resolution No.286 of 2010 dated 17.7.2010, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to recognise the petitioner association as per Section 13 of the Tamilnadu Advocates Welfare Fund Act, 1987.ORDER1. The petitioner is an association of advocates practising in Gobichettipalayam and they have come up with the above writ petition challenging a resolution dated 17.7.2010 passed by the respondent, refusing to recognise the petitioner association in terms of Section 13 of the Tamilnadu Advocates' Welfare Fund Act, 1987.2. Heard Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Y.Masood, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.3. As per the affidavit in support of the writ petition, the members of the petitioner association were originally the members Gobichettipalayam Bar Association, which is recogni...
R.Sekar. Vs. the Principal Commissioner and Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
PRAYER:This petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No. 3893 of 2001 from the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to set aside the order vide Y2/109061/95-2 dated 8.11.1999 passed by the second respondent and confirmed by the first respondent vide Y2/3859/2000 dated 03.10.2000.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order of punishment of stoppage of increment for 3 months without cumulative effect.2. The petitioner was issued a charge memo to which explanation was submitted. The competent authority did not agree with the explanation submitted by the petitioner and appointed an enquiry officer to enquire into charges.3. In the enquiry, the petitioner demanded certain documents, but these were declined on the ground, that the documents asked for were not relevant to the charges framed. However, nothing has been disclosed as...
S.Uttamchand. Vs. N. R.Anjugam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Prayer: These Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Section 115 of C.P.C. against the fair and decretal order dated 19.3.2009 passed by the learned District Munsif Ponneri made in E.P.No. 57 of 2008 in E.P.No.25 of 1992 in O.S.No.918 of 1975.COMMON ORDER1. C.R.P.(NPD).No.405 of 2010 : This revision is directed against the fair and decretal order passed by the learned District Munsif, Ponneri, dated 19.3.2009 made in E.A.No.57 of 2008 in e.P.No.25 of 1992 in O.S.No.918 of 1975 in allowing the application.2. C.R.P.(NPD).No.406 of 2010 : This revision is directed against the fair and decretal order passed by the learned District Munsif, Ponneri, dated 19.3.2009 made in E.P.No.25 of 1992 in O.S.No.918 of 1975 in dismissing the E.P.3. In both the revision petitions, the petitioner was the petitioner in the execution petition in E.P.No.25 o 1992 in O.S.No.918 of 1975 on the file of the District Munsif, Ponneri. The revision petitioner ...
P.Thiyagarajan Vs. the Commissioner.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
PRAYER:This petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No. 8009 of 2001 from the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order vide O.Mu.No.13997/2001/H2 dated 07.12.2001 and consequently, direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service as Sanitary Sweeper with service and terminal benefits.O R D E R1. The petitioner was working as Sanitary worker under the respondent since 04.06.1975. It is submitted that from 18.12.1994, the petitioner could not attend duty due to jaundice. The petitioner undertook treatment for jaundice at Coonoor by staying at his relative's house, for want of money for taking treatment at specialised hospital.2 It is the submission of the petitioner, that his father died during this period, therefore it was on recovery from illness that the petitioner approached the respondent for joining duty in the year 2001. The petitioner was at that time informed that his service stoo...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »