Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Saravana Pavan Nadarajah. Vs. the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical Univer ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to re-value the petitioners answer papers with register No.52941161 relating to Subject Codes 524061-524062 and 524063-524064 by reputed examiners in the subjects of Pathology and Microbiology award the petitioner the correct marks.O R D E R1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that this Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. He had also submitted a letter, dated 11.6.2012, before the High Court Registry.2. In view of the same, the writ petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. No costs. Connected M.P.Nos.1 of 2012 is closed....
The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. the P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2012
W.P.No.19998 of 2008 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent pertaining to his Award made in I.D.No.34 of 2004 dated 10.08.2007 and quash the same.W.P.No.8810 of 2009 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the award passed by the first respondent in I.D.No.34 of 2004 dated 10.08.2007 and quash the Award in so far as back wages is concerned and directing the second respondent to pay all the back wages, arrears of salary and attendant benefits from 15.04.2002 to 10.08.2007.C O M M O N O R D E R1. Both the writ petitions challenge the same Award viz.,the Award of the Labour Court, Coimbatore in I.D.No.34 of 2004 dated 10.08.2007. By the impugned Award, the Labour Court directed reinstatement of the workman with service continuity but without backwages and without any annual increment for the interregnum perio...
N. Dwarakadas and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2012
Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to implement the order of the High Court dated 21.4.2006 passed in W.P. Nos.7971, 11779, 11780, 19938, 24951, 29471, 20328 of 2004 and 1393 to 1399 of 2005, quashing the order of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Chennai in O.A. No.3643 of 1999 dated 12.1.2004 extending the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.126, P&A.R. (U.Spl.) dated 29.5.1998 to the petitioners, who joined before 28.1.1994 and retired before 29.5.1998, by fixing the notional pay on par with the pay of juniors to the petitioners in the finance department and thereby revised the pension of the petitioners and effect payment.O R D E R1. The petitioners have filed the present writ petitions for issuance of writs of mandamus, seeking a direction being issued to the respondent to implement the order of this Court dated 21.4.2006 passed in W.P. Nos.7971, 11779, 11780, 19938, 24951, 29471, 20328 of ...
M/S. T.V.S. Motor Company Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2012
Per D.N. Panda, J. 1. Pursuant to Miscellaneous Order No.258/2011 passed by the Bench on 6.6.2011 against Revenue's application dated 30.11.2009 for early hearing, this matter came up for hearing today after 3 (Three) years of passing Stay order vide No.411/2009 dt. 18.5.2009 granting full waiver of predeposit to the appellant against service tax demand of Rs.1,65,53,563/- followed by levy of equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and interest on the said service tax demanded. 2. None present for Appellant even though the matter was repeatedly called and stay order as well as Miscellaneous order aforesaid disclosed name of Shri K.S. Venkatagiri and Shri V. Panchanathan learned Counsels respectively in the case. 3. An application addressed to the Assistant Registrar of Tribunal and signed by an unnamed person for Lakshmikumaran and Sridhanan was filed i...
A.Palaniammal Vs. the Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd Respondent to implement the order passed by the 2nd Respondent, vide his Letter in Na.Ka.No.634/10/Thi.1, dated 31.03.2010.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by B.RAJENDRAN,J)1. The Petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd Respondent to implement the order passed by the 2nd Respondent, vide his Letter in Na.Ka.No.634/10/Thi.1, dated 31.03.2010.2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader, who has taken notice on behalf of Respondents 1 to 3.3. The Petitioner would contend that her husband by name Vairavan is the owner of the property in Survey No.358 (Patta No.1619), Kedaripatti Village. According to the Petitioner, one Kannan, S/o.Ramar, the 4th Respondent herein, has made an encroachment in the said property, by erecting a Flex Board. When the Petitioner reques...
R.Doraiswamy and ors. Vs. the Member-secretary and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to receive and consider and grant approval for the demolition, planning permission, planning permit and building permit to the petitioners for putting up new construction in the property situated in Block No.D 110, comprised in Survey No.413 Part of Kodambakkam Village, measuring 3 grounds 1865 sq. ft. together with building consisting of 6 flats situated at Anna Main Road, Sangeetha Colony, K.K.Nagar, Chennai-600 078 without insisting upon No Objection Certificate from the third respondent or any other Authority so long as the petitioners construction activities is in accordance with the Development Control Rules.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to receive and consider and grant approval for the demolition, planning permission, planning permit and building permit to the...
The United India Insurance Company Limited. Vs. Devadoss and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed against the Award and Decree dated 02.08.2006 passed in MCOP.No.226 of 2002 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Arni.JUDGEMENT1. The Insurance Company disputing its liability in paying compensation to the claimant, directed this appeal.2. According to the learned counsel for the Insurance Company, the claimant is a gratuitous passenger on board of the lorry. So, there is policy violation. Hence, the Insurance Company is not liable to pay the compensation amount. Further, excessive amount has been awarded by the Tribunal.3. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the claimant would contend that the claimant travelled along with his goods in the vehicle. Ex.R.1 policy will show that non fare passengers are also covered in the policy and the premium also paid for the same. The Tribunal has granted less compensation under various heads.4. On 1.4.2001, the accident had taken place. At the time of the accident, the claimant was on board of ...
R.Ranganathan Vs. R.Jayaprakash
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.04.2001 made in A.S.No.18 of 2000 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Chengalpet, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2000 made in O.S.No.674 of 1994 on the file of the District Munsif, Chengalpet.JUDGMENT1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned first appellate court in A.S.No.18 of 2000 dated 30.04.2001 in confirming the judgment and decree passed by the trial court made in O.S.No.674 of 1994 in dismissing the suit.2. The appellants were the plaintiffs and the respondent was the defendant before the trial court.3. The case of the plaintiffs before the trial court as stated in the plaint would be as follows:- A site, having 16 cents of land in S.No.378/2A of Nandivaram village, belonging to the plaintiffs was orally leased out to the defendant for running a firewood depot about six years back on a monthly rent of Rs.200...
Pappal. Vs. C.Nagarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
Civil revision petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and final order dated 20.12.2010 made in E.P.Nos.31 and 32 of 2010 in MCOP Nos.36 and 37 of 2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Bhavani.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the order dated 20.12.2010 passed in E.P.Nos.31 and 32 of 2010 in MCOP Nos.36 and 37 of 2008 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Bhavani, these civil revision petitions are focussed.2. Heard.3. The facts as stood uncurtained in the facts and circumstances of this case, would run thus:The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal passed award in MCOP Nos.36 and 37 of 2008 mandating the respondents therein to pay compensation; whereupon the claimants/decree holders filed E.Ps. as against the second respondent herein for bringing the property of R2 for sale, in the process of recovering the dues under the award. The counter was filed by the second respondent resisting the sale; whereupon the Court dismissed the E.Ps. on the main ground that already...
D.Sandilyan Vs. the Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the second respondent to allot one of the regulated venue i.e. (1)near Tahsildar office (2)near Revenue Divisional Office for conducting demonstration in future date within a time frame fixed by the court.ORDER1. The petitioner in this writ petition seeks for a direction to the second respondent to permit conducting of demonstration either near Tahsildar Office or near Revenue Divisional Office at Cheyyar.2. The petitioner is a Town Organizer of Viduthalai Chiruthaikal Katchi, a registered political party. When he earlier was denied conducting demonstration by an order dated 8.2.2012, he had moved this court successfully in W.P.No.4139 of 2012. This court by an order dated 1.3.2012 had permitted demonstration to be conducted. In any event, in the present case, when the petitioner sought for conducting demonstration by a representation dated 11.3.2012 as p...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »