Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Madhanagiri. Vs. the Commissioner of Rural Development
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus directing the second respondent to call for the records pertaining to the proceeding bearing ROC No.6744/2008 dated 31.3.2008 and quash the same in so far it relates to the petitioner and further direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the list of Extension officer (new re-designated as Deputy Block Development Officer) in the appropriate place as on 1.3.2008 with all consequential benefits such as retrospective promotion, refixation of seniority, pay etc.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.2. It has been stated that the petitioner is working as a Deputy Block Development Officer, in Thali Block, Krishnagiri District. He had been appointed, initially, as a Masalchi, in Thalli Panchayat Union, with effect from 22.10.1973. Subsequently, he had been poste...
The Managing Director. Vs. Mr.P.Murugesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2012
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree, dated 24.10.2008, passed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.5183 of 1998, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, ( III Small Causes Court) Chennai.JUDGMENT1. The State Transport Corporation, aggrieved by the award of the Tribunal, directed this appeal.2. According to the learned counsel for the Transport Corporation, the deceased sustained injury long back. She died at a latter point of time. So, her death is not due to the road accident injury. Further, the claimant himself had asked for only Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation, however, the Tribunal has awarded him Rs.3,80,500/-.3. The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the cause of death has been proved. On evidence, the Tribunal awarded just compensation, it happens to be more than the amount claimed in the claim petition. That amount can be granted.4. On 12.09.1998, one Anjamal travelled in the Corporation Bus, ...
S.S.Naveen Kumar Vs. the Tamilnadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent 1 and 2 to return the petitioners transfer certificate community certificate and the HIgher Secondary Exam Mark sheet (+2) handedover to the 2nd respondent for joining the MBBS Course for the academic year 2010-2011 to the writ petitioner forthwith or in the alternative permit the petitioner to apply for duplicate of the aforesaid certificates from the respective authorities in order to enable him to pursue his studies.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent 1 and 2 to return the petitioner's original certificates, deposited by him, at the time of admission, i.e., transfer certificate, community certificate and the Higher Secondary Exam Mark sheet (+2).2. The petitioner joined D.D.Medical College & Hospital, which is affiliated to the ...
S.Mohan. Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the proceedings of the respondent in Roc.No.7004/2007/TP2, dated 21.9.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner take into service.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 4.4.2012, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 4.4.2012, on merits and in accorda...
S.Simieon Raj Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2012
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to count half of the service rendered by the petitioner as Social Forestry Worker from 01.09.1982 till 20.08.2005 along with regular service rendered by him as Forest Watcher from 24.08.2005 to 31.07.2011 as qualifying service and send the revised proposal to the fourth respondent and to grant pension with all consequential monetary benefits.O R D E R1. The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to count half of the service rendered by the petitioner as Plot Watcher from 1.9.1982 to 20.8.2005 along with regular service rendered by him as Forest Watcher from 24.8.2005 till 31.7.2011 as qualifying service and send the revised proposal to the fourth respondent and to grant pension with all consequential benefits.2. The case of the petitioner is that he was initially appointed as Plot Watcher in the Forest Department on 1.9.1982 on daily wage bas...
K.iyappan. Vs. the Executive Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records and quash the proceedings of the respondents based on the letter dated 2.9.2011 in Na.Ka.No.80/2007/A1 and to direct the respondent to publish the results of the interview conducted on 2.9.2011 based on his letter dated 24.8.2011 in Na.Ka.No.80/2007.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent.2. The main contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that he should have been selected and appointed, as a Sweeper, based on the interview held by the respondent, on 2.9.2011, as his name had been sponsored by the employment exchange concerned. However, the respondent had selected the other candidates without choosing the petitioner for such appointment. The claim made on behalf of the respondent that the interview, schedul...
P.Rathinam and ors. Vs. the Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2012
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 07.08.2006 issued in Na.Ka.No.242/2006 and quash the same restricting the date of bringing the Petitioners into time scale with effect from 23.06.2006 onwards alone and to issue consequential direction to the respondents to bring the Petitioners into the regular time scale from the date on which they completed three years consolidated pay services in the light of G.O.M.S.No.198 and 199 Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department dated 26.10.1998 and 12.08.1997 and the G.O.Ms.No.84 Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department dated 21.05.1998 and the judgment of Division Bench dt. 23.06.2010 passed in W.A.Nos.47 and 385 of 2010 with all consequential service and monetary benefits.O R D E R1. The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the proceedings of the third respondent dated 07....
Ms.S.Daisant Dollinie. Vs. the Headmistress, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2012
Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to correct the entry of the date of birth of the petitioner in the Anglo Indian School Leaving Certificate Mark Statement and in the School Transfer Certificate as 27.07.1984 according to the birth certificate.O R D E R1. The petitioner has sought for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to correct the date of birth in the Mark Statement and the School Transfer Certificate as 27.07.1984, as per the Birth Certificate issued by the Corporation of Chennai.2. As per the averments made in the supporting affidavit, the petitioner has studied in Holy Angels Anglo Indian Higher Secondary School, T.Nagar, Chennai, from L.K.G. to Xth standard. Thereafter, she pursued her higher secondary course, in another school and at that time, she noticed that her date of birth in the Mark Statement and in School Transfer Certificate has been mentioned as 27.05.19...
B. Balasubramaniyan. Vs. the Director General of Police and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2012
Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the proceedings of the first respondent issued in Na.Ka.No.049742/Niyamanam 1(2)/2010(5), dated 6.4.2010 and quash the same with consequential direction, directing the respondents to select and appoint the petitioner as Grade II Police Constable and depute him for training.O R D E R1. Mr.Rm.Muthukumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.2. The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the order dated 6.4.2010 and to direct the respondents to select and appoint the petitioner as Grade-II Police Constable and depute him for training.3. It is the case of the petitioner that he has passed Plus Two (+2) examinations in the year 2002 and he applied for selection to the post of Police Constable Grade-II in the year 2006-2007 and he was assigned with registration No.0505320. After passing written tes...
S.Kartikeyan Vs. the Liquidator Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-14-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the proceedings Rc No.6574/07 dated 30.4.2008 of the respondent by which the respondent has ordered conditional attachment of the petitioner's salary under the Tamil Nadu Co-op. Societies Act, 1983 and quash the same.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order dated 30.04.2008 passed by the learned Liquidator in exercise of powers under Section 139(2) of the Tamil Nadu Co-op. Societies Act, 1983. 2. The petitioner has statutory remedy of filing revision petition under Section 153 of the Tamil Nadu Co-op. Societies Act, 1983, which reads as under: 153. Revision (1) The Registrar may of his own motion or on application, call for and examine the record of any officer subordinate to him or of the Board or any officer of a ...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »