Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.S.Eswara Rao. Vs. the Assistant Executive Engineer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order passed by the respondent vide proceedings L.C.No.AEE/O & M/VKM/FKT/220 dt.28.02.2004 with consequential relief of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent to restore the electric power supply in L.T.No.078-55-54.O R D E R1. The petitioner is absolute owner of the property situated at =, Chelliamman Koil Street, Ayanavaram, Chennai. The petitioner purchased the property measuring 900 sq.ft. on 2.6.1995 from Mr.Uslam Sherif. At the time of purchase, it was vacant land with single phase E.B. Connection.2. The petitioner constructed a building and thereafter applied for three phase power connection in the month of October, 1995. In pursuance to the payment advice, the petitioner remitted the charges for three phase connection. On receipt of necessary payment, three phase power connection was sanctioned in favour of ...
Workmen of Mirra and Mirra Industries Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent/Government to issue a Corrigendum showing the name of the petitioner Union as the Union to prosecute the I.D.No.579 of 2010 on behalf of the workers of Mirra and Mirra Industries, the second respondent herein, having their factory at Ambattur, Chennai.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents.2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 22.5.2012, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.3. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearin...
theiveegam Financiers and ors. Vs. the Competent Authority and Distric ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
Prayer :-Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order passed by the learned Special Judge under TNPID Act, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.857 of 2009 in C.C.No.12 of 2005, dated 10.09.2009.ORDER1. The above revision petitioners had filed the Crl.M.P.No.857 of 2009 in C.C.No.12 of 2005, on the file of Special Judge under TNPID Act, Chennai dated 10.09.2009, for discharging them from the proceedings in C.C.No.12 of 2005. The same was dismissed by the learned judge on merits. Aggrieved by the dismissal order, the above revision has been filed.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:-The second respondent herein, viz., Inspector of Police, attached to Economic Offences Wing-II, Karur has registered a case in Crime No.1 of 2004, against the revision petitioners for the alleged offence under Section 5 of TNPID Act, 1997 for the default committed by the revision petitioners to the tune of Rs.12,28,409/-. Subsequently, the case was taken on file in C.C.No.12 ...
R.Shankar Vs. the District Collector, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.m3/108/2012 dated 10.1.2012 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 5.3.2012.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. It has been stated that the petitioner is the Vice- President of the Karayampalayam village, in Sankarapuram Taluk, Villupuram District, consisting of 90 families. The Government of Tamil Nadu had announced a scheme to provide Green houses, with solar power, to certain categories of people, including widows, physically handicapped and mentally depressed persons. As per the said Scheme, the first respondent had allotted 35 houses for the Village and had directed the fourth respondent and the other authorities co...
M.Subramaniam Vs. the Tamil Nadu Information Commission,, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the issue of impugned order by the first respondent in Lr.No.11803/D4/11 dated 11.04.2011 and quash the same and to direct the first respondent to issue appropriate orders to cause issue of the information sought for by the petitioner i.e., the document based on which the extent of lands belonging to the petitioner's father has been reduced from 6.93 acres (2.81 hectares) to 6.69 (2.71 hectares) in patta No.155 situate in Survey No.146/2 of Perur Village of Coimbatore Taluk and further to direct the first respondent to impose penalties on the respondents 2 and 3 and to recommend departmental action as mandated under the RTI Act.ORDER1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking to challenge an order dated 11.04.2011 issued by the State Information Commission advising the petitioner that his request ...
A.Balamani Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to comply with the LPG Marketing Plan 1996-98 approved by the Ministry of Petroleum dated 05.09.1997 and supplemented by guidelines dated 14.02.2000 by the fifth respondent which provides for Rural Distributorship embracing the adjoining area covering the villages to a radius of 15 km and consequently, forbearing the respondents 1 & 2 from identifying or locating in any manner appointing or granting of distributorship in favour of the third respondent at the proposed location being Vembadithalam Village, Salem Taluk and District falling within the distribution area of the petitioner being operated from Elampillai Village, Salem Taluk, Salem District.O R D E R1. The petitioner has preferred the present Writ of Mandamus praying for an issuance of an order by this Court in directing the respondents 1 and 2 to comply with the LPG M...
Dr.K.Vasudevan, Principal Vs. the Child Welfare Committee
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Prohibition prohibiting the 1st respondent from proceeding with the complaint of the 2nd respondent dated 02.10.2011.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. It has been stated by the petitioner that the second respondent was studying in the petitioner school, from L.K.G., upto XIth standard. There were certain complaints against the second respondent stating that he had been making lewd comments and he has been using vulgar language, while teasing some girls students in the School. On 9.4.2011, the petitioner had received a complaint from a girl student namely, Sandhya and her father Sairam, alleging that the second respondent had been indulging in eve-teasing and had opened a Facebook Account in her name and had been using vulgar and filthy language, creating a negative imp...
Maraimalai Nagar Welfare Association Vs. the Commissioner, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pass orders on the representation dated 2.4.2012 submitted by the petitioner (within the time limit that might be imposed by this Court), to cancel/withdraw the bye-laws relating to supply of drinking water connection and its regulation dated 28.11.2011 published in the Kancheepuram District Gazette on 16.12.2011 to issue bye-laws by meticulously following the provisions of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920 and till then, to maintain/restore the original position.O R D E R1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pass orders on the representation dated 2.4.2012 submitted by the petitioner (within the time limit that might be imposed by this Court), to cancel/withdraw the bye-laws relating to supply of drinking water connection and its regulation dated 28.11.2011 pu...
P. Manickam. Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent relating to the order in (1) Na.K.No.2292/08/A1 dated 19.08.2011(2) Pro.Roc.No.3285/2010/A1 dated 30.01.2012 and (3) Pro.Roc.No.3285/2010(A1) dated 31.01.2012, to quash the said orders and to issue consequential directions to the respondents to allow the petitioner to peacefully retire from service on 31.01.2012 A.N. (Prayer Amended as per order dt. 08.02.2012 in Mps.1&2/2012 in W.P.No.29367/2011)ORDER1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, challenging the validity of the proceedings of the first respondent, dated 19.08.2011, by which a fresh enquiry had been ordered by appointing an enquiry officer, to enquire into the charges levelled against the petitioner. The petitioner has further stated that, based ...
A.Nazaar Vs. Inspector General of Registration, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-18-2012
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, for the relief as stated therein.O R D E R1. The petitioner has filed the present Writ of Mandamus, praying for issuance of a direction by this Court in directing the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct an enquiry on the petitioner's complaint dated 12.07.2008 and to take action against the fourth respondent.2. According to the petitioner, originally the property in Survey Nos.138/4, 138/3, 138/2, 138/5, 139/4, 161/1, 138/6 measuring in all 13 acres 31 cents and in Survey Nos.152/1 and 152/2 measuring an extent of 5 Acres and 60 cents situated at Thiruvalkudi Village, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District, were purchased by him and his Uncle K.Abdul Wahab jointly from one Ambigapathy, as per two sale deeds dated 03.05.1990 (registered as Document Nos.375 and 376 of 1990 on the file of the District Registrar's Office, Karaikudi).3. It is the case of the petitioner that a...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »