Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohammad Irfan Vs. the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 407 Cr.P.C., to transfer the case in J.C.No. 74 of 2012 on the file of the Juvenile Justice Board, Chennai, to any other District Juvenile Board.ORDER1. Children are our national asset. It is, therefore, the responsibility of everyone to ensure the dignity, safety and wellbeing of the children. It is, all the more, of vital importance that the human rights of the children are fully protected. The Children who come into conflict with law emerge as law breakers due to factors like poverty, hunger, social discard, environmental influence in the educational institutions, lack of care by parents and so on. The society shall approach them with compassion to channelize them to the mainstream of the society. Providing fair enquiry (trial) to such juvenile in conflict with law itself is a fundamental right and in other words, a human right. Such children have a right to express their defence freely. Alleging that fair enquiry has not been ...
Ms.Lakshmi Spinners Rep.. Vs. Superintendent of Market
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.11.2006.O R D E R1. The petitioner has projected this Writ of Mandamus praying for issuance of an order by this Court in directing the respondent to consider its representation, dated 22.11.2006.2. The Respondent/Superintendent, Marketing Committee, Udumalpet, has issued a notice, dated 08.09.2006, addressed to the petitioner calling upon it to submit a copy of the agreement made by it and Super Spinning Mills, if any, for perusal of its office so that it will be able to know the nature of transaction, viz., change of place of ownership of cotton. Further, it also stated that if agreement is not made, then it directed the petitioner to report where ownership of cotton is changed between it with due proof within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice etc. Moreover, the...
N. Kumaresan and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners herein on and after completion of 5/10 years of services on the basis of the representation dated 22.2.2006 and followed by the reminder dated 15.5.2006 as per the Government Orders and within a time to be stipulated by this Court.O R D E R1. The petitioners have filed the present writ of mandamus praying for issuance of an order by this Court in directing the respondents to regularize their services on and after completion of 5/10 years of services on the basis of the representation dated 22.2.2006 and followed by a reminder dated 15.5.2006 as per the Government Orders and within a time to be stipulated by this Court.2. According to the petitioners, they were appointed on casual labour basis with effect from the respective dates and they are continued to work with regular fictional breaks. Their date of first a...
S.P.Sivasubramanian Vs. the Tahsildar and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent proceedings in Na. Ka. No.A5/9959/2011 dated 6.9.2011 and quash the same.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order passed by respondent No.1 in cancelling the patta standing in the name of the petitioner.2. It is the submission of the petitioner that the land measuring 0.44.5 acres (Punja Land) was registered in the name of his mother Unnamalai Ammal, and the property measuring 0.12.0 acres falling in S.No.130/10 was in the name of his father Vadivel Gounder.3. The land was gifted to the petitioner by his mother, vide registered gift deed dated 10.1.2008. The mutation of land was also sanctioned in the name of the petitioner. The petitioner, all of a sudden, was served with the order regarding the change of patta. The trans...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ms.Ashok Leyland Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
PRAYER: T.C.(A) Nos.1253 and 1254 of 2005 are filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 04.02.2005 made in ITA No.888 & 997/99 for the assessment year 1995-96.T.C.(A) Nos.1256 of 2005 is filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 04.02.2005 made in ITA No.888 & 997/99 for the assessment year 1995-96.JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J.)1. The Revenue has preferred in T.C.(A) No.1253 and 1254 of 2005, raising the following substantial questions of law, with regard to the assessment year 1995-96:1. Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in equating a proposal to expand the capacity of production with extension of industrial undertaking under Section 35D of the Income Tax Act?2.Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the expenses re...
K.Duraisingam. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 20.09.2011 in accordance with Section 48-B of the Land Acquisition Act and grant exemption / reconveyance of land in situated in Survey No.344/3 (0.14 cents), Survey No.344/5 (0.27 cents) and in Survey No.337/7B (0.33 cents) measuring in all acres 0.74 cents in Sholinganallur Village, Saidapet Taluk, Chennai.O R D E R1. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary equitable jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the State of Tamil Nadu to consider the representation dated 20.09.2011 in accordance with Section 48-B of the Land Acquisition Act and grant exemption / reconveyance of land situated in Survey No.344/3 (0.14 cents), Survey No.344/5 (0.27 cents) and in Survey No.337/7B (0.33 cents) in all measuring 0.74 cents in Sholinganallur Village, Saidape...
M.K.Multivision Software Private Limited Vs. the State of Tamilnadu an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the fourth respondent in Letter No.Na.Ka.No.01/2011 Alagu 2, dated 11.04.2012 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and consequently directing the respondents to allot an alternate site to the petitioner company as envisaged in the orders passed in the Writ Petitions viz., W.P.No.17850 to 17852 of 2009 dated 28.1.2010 as well as W.P.Nos.30221 of 2007 dated 2.2.2012 and also in W.P.No.28268 of 2011.O R D E R1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the fourth respondent in Letter No.Na.Ka.No.01/2011 Alagu 2, dated 11.04.2012 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and consequently directing the respondents to allot an alternate site to the petitioner company as envis...
M. Tharujideen Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner for appointment to the post of Driver in the second respondent office within the period that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.ORDER1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, seeking for a direction to the second respondent to give him appointment to the post of Driver in his office.2. The petitioner has averred in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition that he is a physically challenged person, enrolled his name in the District Disabled Rehabilitation Centre, Ramanathapuram and his Identity Card Number is 1264. He was also issued with a disability certificate and his disability was assessed at 60%. It is further averred that he was issued with a Driving License by the Assistant Licensing Authority, Ramanathapuram on 24.12.2004. Subsequently, he enrolled his name in the District Employmen...
P.Malayappan Vs. the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
PRAYERWrit Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 14.9.2011 passed in W.P.(MD)No.10434 of 2011 on the file of this Court.JUDGMENTR.BANUMATHI,J1. This intra-court appeal is preferred against the order dated 14.9.2011 passed in W.P.(MD)No.10434 of 2011 dismissing the Writ Petition and declining to quash the Charge Memo dated 20.04.2011.2. The appellant has been working as Secretary of the second respondent society, which is a Co-operative Institution registered under the Tamil Nadu Co- operative Societies Act and the rules made thereunder. The object of the second respondent society is to promote welfare of its agrarian members by way of lending agricultural loans and also by way of issuing jewel loan, consumer loan, loan on deposit to the members of the society. As per the bye-law of the society, the appellant being Secretary of the second respondent society was responsible for day-to-day affairs of the society.2. The charge against the appellant is t...
S. Kannan Vs. the Commissioner of Technical Education
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2012
Writ Petition filed under under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to approve the admission of the petitioner in M.E.Degree course for the Academic Year 2011-2012 and to permit the petitioner to write the 1st year M.E Degree course examination and to publish the result for the same.ORDER1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition, praying for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus to direct the respondents, to approve the admission of the petitioner in M.E.Degree course for the Academic Year 2011-2012 and thereby permit the petitioner to write the 1st year M.E Degree examination.2. The petitioner after completing school education, passed Draughtsman Mechanical Trade (ITI) and also underwent apprenticeship course and in addition obtained Provisional National Apprenticeship Certificate. After completing apprenticeship course, he joined in a private concern.3. The petitioner completed Bachelor of Compu...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »