Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Thaiyal Nayagi Vs. the State of Tamilnadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pass orders on the representation dated 13.2.2009, seeking regularisation of the petitioner services and other consequential service and pensionary benefits on merits and as per law, within a time to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents.2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 13.2.2009, with regard to the relief of seeking regularisation and pensionary benefits, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.3. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.4. In vi...
V.Koodalingappan Vs. P.L.Prema
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
Civil revision petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 as amended by Act 23/73 and 1 of 1980 against the judgment and decree dated 20.04.2012 passed by the learned VI Judge (VII Judge,I/c), Court of Small Causes, Chennai in R.C.A.No.29 of 2010 in confirming the order and decree dated 03.12.2009 passed by the learned XII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in RCOP No.424 of 2009.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 20.04.2012 passed by the learned VI Judge (VII Judge,I/c), Court of Small Causes, Chennai in R.C.A.No.29 of 2010 in confirming the order and decree dated 03.12.2009 passed by the learned XII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai in RCOP No.424 of 2009, this civil revision petition has been focussed by the tenant.2. The parties, for convenience sake, are referred to here under according to their litigative status and ranking before the Rent Controller.3. A summation and summarisation of the germane fa...
Santhanagopal Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 and 389 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 12.11.2002, made in S.C.No.262 of 2001 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No.III, Virudhachalam.J U D G M E N T1. The Criminal Appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 12.11.2002, made in S.C.No.262 of 2001, on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No.III, Virudhachalam, where by A1 was convicted for the offences under Sections 498A, 304B read with Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. A1 was convicted for the offence under Section 304B IPC read with Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and sentenced him to undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment and A1 was convicted for the offence under Section 498A and sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default in payment to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment a...
S.Pandeswari Vs. the Director of Medical Education
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2012
PRAYERWrit petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent in Ref.Rc.No.5068/P & D/2007 dated 18.04.2007 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to permit the petitioner to vend Aavin products at the site opposite to the entrance of the Pediatric Block of the Raja Mirasudar Government Hospital Campus, Thanjavur Street, Thanjavur - 4.ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed....
The Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Vs. M.Chitram P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2012
PRAYER Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the Labour Judge, Madurai, in I.D.No.174 of 1997 dated 09.10.2007.ORDER 1. The first respondent was appointed as a Driver in the writ petitioner Transport Corporation on 01.05.1981. During 1991, one Loganathan sent a complaint that the first respondent furnished bogus educational certificate, relating to the date of birth, while he joined service. The issue was referred to the Chief Educational Officer, Madurai. The Chief Educational Officer sent a letter dated 20.07.1991 to the writ petitioner that the Assistant Educational Officer verified the records of the Panchayat Union Middle School at Karuppati and that the date of birth ...
J.Surendran Vs. Mrs.Sudha Vijayakumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2012
Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the O S Rules r/w Order VII Rule 1 of CPC read with sections 55 and 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957 for a judgment and decree a) for a declaration, declaring that the plaintiff is the absolute and exclusive owner of the entire copyright in the work 'Naan Yen Piranthen', the written autobiography of late Dr.M.G.Ramachandran, former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu; b) for a permanent injunction, restraining the defendants, their agents, servants and men and everyone claiming under them and acting on their behalf from, in any way, infringing the plaintiff's exclusive and absolute copyright in the work 'Naan Yen Piranthen', the written autobiography of late Dr.M.G.Ramachandran, former Chief Minister of Tamilnadu, and written by late Dr.M.G.Ramachandran, either by printing, publishing or trading in the same or in any other manner whatsoever; c) directing the defendants to render a true and proper account to the plaintiff of the sales proceeds of the aforesai...
Mrs. Mecca Mehrunnissa Begum Vs. Chief Revenue Controlling Authority
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st Respondent in D.Dis.No.30196/P1/2011 dated 13.09.2011 confirming the order passed by the 2nd Respondent dated 03.05.2011 in I2/2011 and quash the same and direct the 2nd Respondent to register the sale deed which has been assigned as P.No.52 of 2011.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.2. The main objection pointed out by the respondents, in their impugned orders, dated 3.5.2011 and 13.9.2011, is that one Dharmaprakash J.Kumar, has been shown as a vendor in the sale deed sought to be registered on the file of the second respondent, in respect of the property in question, even though he is only an agreement holder.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that it is clear, from the recitals on page No.11 of th...
The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Tvl. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2012
Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the second respondent pertaining to the order dated 26.2.1999 in T.A.Nos.77 and 491 of 1999 and quash the same as illegal.COMMON ORDERELIPE DHARMA RAO, J1. The State, rep. by the Deputy Commissioner (CT), has come with the present writ petitions against the common order passed by the second respondent, viz., Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short "the Tribunal"), dated 26.2.1999 in T.A.Nos.460 and 491 of 1998.2. Since the issue involved in these writ petitions are one and the same and both are intrinsically inter-connected, with the consent of the counsel, they were heard together and disposed of by this common order.3. The facts leading to filing of the writ petitions are as follows:-The first respondent Tvl. Steel Authority of India Limited (in short "the SAIL") is a Government of India Enterprises, engaged in the manufacturing of stainless ...
C.Parimalam Vs. the Deputy Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent No.NIL dated 6.2.2012 and to quash the same.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. The main contention of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that the lease agreement, dated 21.7.2008, entered into between the petitioner and the second respondent, had been cancelled by the impugned proceedings, dated 6.2.2012, issued by the second respondent, without prior notice having been issued to the petitioner. Since the second respondent had not followed the principles of natural justice before cancelling the lease agreement, by his order, dated 6.2.2012, the said proceedings is arbitrary illegal and void.3. It has been further submitted that the lease agreement, entered into between the ...
A.Nallayamperumal and ors. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2012
Prayer in W.P.No.25245/08: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent Board to extend the Special Grade Scheme to the Petitioners herein introduced vide Memo (Per) No. 54595/A3/A31/2006-5 dated 05.04.2007.C O M M O N O R D E R1. This judgement shall dispose of the following writ petitions, viz., as common question of law and facts are involved in all these writ petitions. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are being taken from W.P.No.25245 of 2008.2. The petitioners have invoked the extraordinary equitable jurisdiction of this Court with prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent Board to extend the Special Grade Scheme to the Petitioners, which was introduced vide Memo (Per) No. 54595/A3/A31/2006-5 dated 05.04.2007.3. The petitioners in these writ petitions are the retired Assistant Executive Engineers and Junior Engineer Grade I respectivel...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »