Chennai Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sangameswsaran, Proprietor, M/S. Sangamesh Exports Vs. the Branch Mana ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
(This Petition having come for final hearing before us on 07.06.2012 in the presence of both the parties and hearing upon the arguments of both sides and perused the materials on records, this Commission pronounced the following:-)A.K. ANNAMALAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Petitioner/complainant filed this petition under section 24(A) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to condone the delay of 329 days in filing the consumer complaint against the respondents/opposite parties. 1. The complainant, doing export of garment business, had entrusted the goods to be shifted through the 2nd opposite party and original documents were entrusted to the 1st opposite party for collection of money from the buyers and in such transactions since the documents were released on payments for the goods exported were not issued by the complainant from the 1st opposite party and regarding the deficiency in such transaction in order to file a complaint before the Consumer Forum there was a delay of 329 days in filing t...
The Secretary of Tamil Nadu Vs. Chitra Timber Traders
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
PRAYERWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue an order of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Madurai, made in M.T.A. No.70 of 1999, dated 16.04.2004 and quash the same.ORDERB.RAJENDRAN, J.1. The State has preferred this Writ Petition aggrieved against the order passed by Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Madurai/the second respondent herein, made in M.T.A. No.70 of 1999, dated 16.04.2004 for quashing the same.2. According to the petitioner, the first respondent Chitra Timber Traders, Kottakulam, Shencottah, are dealers in timber and are assessed on the file of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Shencottah Assessment Circle. They were finally assessed on a total and taxable turnover of Rs.6,78,423/- and Rs.1,57,044/- by order dated 17.02.1994 in CST 471228/92-93 under the Central Sales Tax Act. Based on the extract verific...
The Manager Needle Industries (India) Limited Vs. R.Bojan.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
JUDGMENTR.BANUMATHI,J.1. This Intra-Court appeal is preferred against the order dated 16.03.2012 in W.P.(MD)No.3362 of 2008, whereby learned judge directed the Management to pay a lumpsum compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- in lieu of reinstatement and back wages and further directed the Management to credit the Provident Fund arrears to the Department for the aforesaid period.2. The appellant establishment is a Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act and is manufacturing needles of all varieties in its factory at Ketti in the District of Nilgiris. It is having regional office and sales centres throughout the country. Respondent/ workman was appointed as Junior Clerk on probation by the appointment order dated 29.4.1971 and was confirmed as Junior Clerk by an order dated 2.5.1972 and subsequently he was promoted as Senior Clerk. In May, 1996, it was decided to upgrade the Sales Office at Madurai and the 1st respondent, being a Senior Clerk, was transferred to Madurai to work in t...
S.Angayarkanni Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to appoint the petitioner on regular basis in the post of Typist Grade III on the day on which the similarly placed candidates are appointed as Typist or Steno Typist Grade III on regular basis pursuant to the special competitive Examination 2009 conducted by the respondent No.4 for the post of Typist or Steno Typist Grade III on regular basis.O R D E R1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4, to absorb the petitioner in the post of Typist Grade III on par with other candidates who were appointed as Typist or Steno Typist Grade III in pursuance to Special Competitive Examination 2009 conducted by the respondent No.4 for the post of Typist or Steno Typist Grade III.2. The petitioner belongs to schedule caste community, and passed S.S.L.C. as also the Tamil Typew...
S.M.Syed Jainudeen Vs. Durairaj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
Civil revision petition preferred against the order dated 27.3.2012 passed by the District Judge, Thiruvarur, in I.A.No.31 of 2011 in A.S.No.11 of 2011.ORDER1. Inveighing the order dated 27.3.2012 passed by the District Judge, Thiruvarur, in I.A.No.31 of 2011 in A.S.No.11 of 2011, this civil revision petition is filed.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice to the respondents is not necessary, in view of the order being passed hereunder.3. The grievance of the revision petitioner/plaintiff, as highlighted by his counsel, could succinctly and precisely be encapsulated in a few broad stroke hereunder:(i) The revision petitioner is the plaintiff, who filed the suit seeking several reliefs. Ultimately, the suit was decreed granting the following reliefs:(ii) The second defendant preferred the appeal and he also filed the I.A.No.31 of 2011 seeking stay. Whereupon the appellate Court, vide order dated 27.3.2012 granted stay, without imposing any condition.4. Being aggrieved b...
M.Kumar and ors. Vs. the Corporation of Chennai and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to receive and process petitioners' application for planning permission at Block No.31, Ex-servicemen Quarters, 1st Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-600 083, without insisting upon No Objection Certificate from the third respondent in the circumstances of the case.O R D E R1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to receive and process petitioners' application for planning permission at Block No.31, Ex-servicemen Quarters, 1st Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-600 083, without insisting upon No Objection Certificate from the third respondent in the circumstances of the case.2. Ms.Karthikaa Ashok, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the first respondent; Mr.P.Tamilmani, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the second respondent and Mr.Vanchinathan, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the thi...
G.A. Rasheed Vs. the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records from the 1st respondent relating to the impugned Order G.O.Ms.No.42 Trpt.(RW) Department dated 27.5.2005 and to quash the condition that the period of daily paid services should be excluded while arriving at net qualifying service as illegal and ultra vires and consequently directing the respondents to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 18.2.2009 sanctioning pension as per rulings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.ORDER1. The petitioner joined duty as a Welder in the erstwhile Tamil Nadu State Transport Department on 15.10.1968, as temporary employee on daily wages, but was paid on monthly basis.2. The service of the petitioner was regularised on 11.11.69. The petitioner continued to work in the Transport Department as a Government Employee, and was thereafter absorbed in the then Pallavan Transport Corporation with e...
C. Venkatesan Vs. the Director Geneal of Police and Chairman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, call for the records in the letter bearing No. RC.110/99989/respondents 2 to 3 and quash the same so far as the said letter relates to the petitioner and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to appoint the petitioner to the post of Police Constable Grade II subject to verification of his community certificate by the competent authority.O R D E R1. The State of Tamil Nadu invited applications for recruitment to the post of Police Constable Grade-II. The petitioner, being eligible applied for recruitment as Police Constable against the post reserved for Scheduled Tribes.2. The petitioner was called for physical test, which he qualified, thereafter, was subjected to the written test and interview. On being selected, the petitioner was sent for medical examination, where he was declared 'medically fit'. In pursuance to the selection, the petitioner should have be...
Annakilli Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records of the detention order dated 02.12.2011 vide detention Memo No.644/BDFGISSV/2011 on the file of the second respondent herein, and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to produce the body of the detenue, Ramachandran, S/o.Ramasamy, aged about 33 years detained in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, and set him at liberty.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by K.N.BASHA, J.)1. The petitioner, who is the wife of the detenu, Ramachandran, has come forward with this petition challenging the order of detention dated 02.12.2011 slapped on her husband branding him as Goonda.2. Mr.S.Senthil, learned counsel for the petitioner, would contend that though he has raised several other grounds, he is mainly taking the ground of non-application of mind on the part of the detaining as in the grounds of detention it is stated that the remand period was sai...
M.Jayaraj Vs. the Superintendent of Police and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent relating to the order in Na.Ka.No.152/SDOC/Gen1/2012 dated 30.05.2012, passed by the second respondent and quash the same, consequently to direct the respondents to grant permission and protection to conduct party policy propaganda scheduled to be held on any day within a period of one month.ORDER1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner, who is the Town Secretary of Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) which is a registered political party. In this writ petition, the challenge is to the impugned order passed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tindivanam, dated 30.5.2012 denying permission for the petitioner to conduct a public meeting explaining the policies of the party on 5.6.2012. The authority, i.e., the second respondent had denied permission to conduct the public meeting in the Gahdhiar Thida...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »