Chennai Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramasamy Vs. the Sub Registrar and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2012
Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the order dated 29.09.2011-Ma;t[ eWf;F -(Inspection Slip) on the file of the 1st respondent quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 29.09.2011 in respect of the property measuring an extent of 1300 sq.ft. comprised in R.S.No.468/1, Udumbiyam Village, Veppanthattai Taluk, Perambalur District.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order passed by the 1st respondent in refusing to register the Sale Deed presented for registration, as also the order of the 2nd respondent in directing the Sub Registrar not to register the documents.2. It is the submission of the petitioners that Ramasamy Gounder Son of Palanivel Gounder purchased the land measuring 4.72 Acres in R.S.No.468/1, Udumbiyam Vi...
T.P.Latha at Hemalatha and ors. Vs. P.Sukumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2012
Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree, dated 27.04.2009 passed in O.S.No.84 of 2008 on the file of the learned I Additional District Judge, Erode.K.Mohan Ram, J.,1. The defendants in O.S.No.84 of 2008 on the file of the I Additional District Court, Erode, are the appellants in the above appeal. The respondent / plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of the agreement of sale, dated 10.03.2007 against the appellants / defendants and the trial court decreed the suit and being aggrieved by that, the above appeal has been filed by the appellants.2. The case of the respondent before the Court below is as follows:-The suit property belonged to one Late.T.M.Pasai Nayagam and he died on 11.08.2005 leaving behind the appellants as his legal heirs and the appellants inherited the suit properties and became the absolute owners thereof. The appellants made a proclamation for sale of the suit property for their family expenses and a...
A.K.Nawaz Vs. Kalpana
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2012
Civil revision petition preferred against the order and decreetal order of the Principal District Munsif, Alandur in I.A.No.1332 of 2011 in I.A.No.1691 of 2010 in O.S.No.219 of 2005 dated 12.11.2011.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the order dated 12.11.2011 passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Alandur in I.A.No.1332 of 2011 in I.A.No.1691 of 2010 in O.S.No.219 of 2005, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the lower Court.3. Pithily and precisely, tersely and briefly the relevant facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this revision would run thus:The revision petitioner/plaintiff herein filed the suit for permanent injunction as against two defendants namely Kalpana/D1 and Padmanabhan/D2, the respondents herein. D2 entered appearance and for him Vakalat was filed by the Advocate who also undertook to file Vakalat for D1-Kalpana. Subsequently, no such Vakalat wa...
K.Vijayakumar Vs. the Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2012
Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to initiate enquiry against the 2nd respondent in connection with the complaint No.53398/R3/2010 dated 05.10.2010 on the file of the first respondent and make necessary indication or endorsement in Book IV in which document No.1001/IV/2009 registered as the impugned Power of Attorney Deed dated 31.10.2009 in Doc.No.1001/IV/2009 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein as nonest and invalid document and issue encumbrance certificate with such endorsement to the petitioner.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to initiate enquiry against the 2nd respondent in connection with the complaint No.53398/R3/2010 dated 05.10.2010, and to make necessary indication or endorsement in Book IV in which document No.1001/IV/2009 registered as the impugned Power of ...
The Executive Officer Vs. Ponnalagesan.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2012
PRAYERCriminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the order dated 17.7.2007 made in C.M.P.No.2049 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Manaparai.ORDER1.The following are the contentions raised in the petition filed by the revision petitioner under Section 101 of Tamilnadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act'):-1.(a) Veerappur Arulthiru Kannimar amman Vahayara Temple, Nallampillai Village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichirappalli Distrit is a listed temple coming under the jurisdiction of Joint Commissioner, HR & CE, Administration Department, Srirengam, Tiruchirappalli. A scheme decree was passed in O.S.No.125 of 1945 on the file of the Sub-Court, Tiruchirappalli for better management and administration of the said temple on 27.11.1946. As per the terms of the scheme decree, the hereditary trustees from the specified family are administering and maintaining the temple.1.(b)...
A.Settu. Vs. the District Collector and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from interfering into the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the property in S.No.10/6E, at Karattur, Manathaal Village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District, without following due process of law under the Land Acquisition Act.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from interfering into the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the property in S.No.10/6E, at Karattur, Manathaal Village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District, without following due process of law under the Land Acquisition Act.2. Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5. In view of the nature of order to be passed, the notice to the respondents 6 and 7 is disposed with. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. Th...
C.Savithiri Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2012
Civil revision petition preferred against the conditional order dated 23.06.2011 passed by the learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode in E.A.No.277 of 2011 in E.P.No.95 of 2010.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the order dated 23.06.2011 passed by the learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode in E.A.No.277 of 2011 in E.P.No.95 of 2010, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the lower Court.3. A thumb nail sketch of the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this revision would run thus:This revision is focussed as against the order dated 23.06.2011 on the ground that the lower Court ignoring the fact that already a substantial amount was paid by the judgment debtors to the decree holder, simply adjourned the sale with a condition that a sum of Rs.25,000/- should be deposited by 28.07.2011.4. Heard both.5. Ex facie and prima facie, this revision is not maintainable. A m...
The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Sabarigiri Industries
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2012
Tax Case Revision to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench), Chennai dated 15.12.2000 in T.A.No. 874/99 & C.O.P.No. 871/99.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J)1. The above Tax Case Revision is at the instance of the Revenue against the order passed by the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench), Chennai for the assessment year 1996-97. The questions raised in the above Tax Case Revision is as follows:-"(i)Whether as against the order of rectification, an appeal would lie to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner? and(ii) Whether for ascertaining the rate of tax under Additional Sales Tax, the turnover for the year has to be taken and the appropriate rate of tax has to be adopted for levy of additional sales tax on the turnover upto 31.7.96?"2. As far as the first issue on the rectification order is concerned, a perusal of the order of rectification by the Assessing Authority shows that the assessment under the ...
Balaji Vs. Kamalavathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2012
These civil revision petitions are filed against the common order dated 18.3.2011 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Perambalur, in I.A.No.151 and 195 of 2010 in O.S.No.197 of 2001.COMMON ORDER1. Inveighing the common order dated dated 18.3.2011 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Perambalur, in I.A.Nos.151 and 195 of 2010 in O.S.No.190 of 2001, these civil revision petitions are focussed.2. Heard both sides.3. A thumbnail sketch of the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of these petitions would run thus:(i) The revision petitioners herein filed the suit O.S.No.197 of 2001 for recovery of the unpaid sale consideration to a tune of Rs.6,58,900/-.(ii) The defendants entered appearance and their advocate filed the vakalat. Thereafter, no written statement was filed and subsequently, the suit was decreed ex-parte on 16.10.2003.(iii) The defendants, after a long delay, filed the I.A.Nos.151 and 195 of 2010 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to get the delay of 1,180 days cond...
V.Parvathy Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to absorb the petitioner as Cook in the 3rd respondent Hostel by giving the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.21 Labour and Employment (N2) Department dated 02.02.2000 for the purpose of calculating the age restriction for being appointed to the said post.O R D E R1. The petitioner belongs to Hindu Pallan Community, which is a recognised Scheduled Caste community, after passing 8th Standard, she got her name registered with the District Employment Office, Trichy, on 29.02.1996. The registration of petitioner was later transferred to the District Employment Office, Perambalur, on bifurcation of Trichy District.2. The petitioner was working as a Cook in the Adidravidar Government Girls Hostel, Ammapalayam, Perambalur District on temporary basis. She worked there from 01.09.1992 to 26.03.1993. She was again appointed on temporary basis till December 1994.3....
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »