Chennai Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tmt. D. Easwari Vs. the Deputy Registrar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent dated 10.3.2012 for the property bearing Plot No.338, South Chennai Co-operative Nagar, Perumbakkam Village, previously Tambaram Taluk, presently at Shozhinganallur Taluk, Kancheepuram District comprised in Survey No.300/2, 301/1 admeasuring an extent of 1936 sq.ft. Registered as document No.6487 of 2010 dated 29.6.2010 and quash the same.ORDER1. This writ petition is filed to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent dated 10.3.2012 for the property bearing Plot No.338, South Chennai Co-operative Nagar, Perumbakkam Village, previously Tambaram Taluk, presently at Shozhinganallur Taluk, Kancheepuram District comprised in Survey No.300/2, 301/1 admeasuring an extent of 1936 sq.ft. Registered as document No.6487 of 2010 dated 29.6.2010 and quash the same.2. The petitioner in this case claims that he is a purchaser o...
V.Vijayaprakash Vs. State Rep.by the Sub-inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records and to quash the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.300 of 2009 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram.O R D E R1. Invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C., this criminal original petition is filed by the petitioner to quash the criminal proceedings pertaining to the case in C.C.No.300 of 2009, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram.2. The petitioner and the second respondent are the husband and wife. Their marriage was solemnized on 20.08.2008 at Ambattur. No sooner than their marriage, a crack was developed in their matrimonial relationship. They both have exchanged allegations against each other.3. When the matter stood thus, the second respondent had lodged a complaint against the petitioner on 10.11.2008 before the first respondent viz., the Sub-Inspector of Police, attached to W3,...
V.Ranganathan Vs. the Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order Rc.No.Pen(CZ)/165/11734/09 dated 24.02.2010 passed by the third respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay interest and penal interest at the rate of 12% as per the working contained in the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2010 for the delay of payment of salary as well as pension and gratuity after the petitioner's retirement.ORDER1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order passed by the third respondent dated 24.02.2010 in Rc.No.Pen(CZ)/165/11734/09 rejecting the representation of the petitioner seeking for the relief of payment of interest for the belated payment and settlement of terminal benefits.2.0. The case of the petitioner is that he had been recruited as Police Constable Grade II in 1960, promoted as Head Constable in 1973, promoted as Assistant Sub Inspector...
Ramalingam Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.1993 in A.S.No.233 of 1992 on the file of the Learned Additional District Judge, Nagapattinam, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 18.09.1990 in O.S.No.214 of 1982 on the file of the Learned District Munsif, Nagapattinam.M.VENUGOPAL, J.1. The Appellant/Plaintiff has focussed the instant Second Appeal adverting upon the Judgment and Decree dated 30.09.1993 in A.S.No.233 of 1992 passed by the Learned Additional District Judge, Nagapattinam in reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 18.09.1990 in O.S.No.214 of 1982 passed by the Learned District Munsif, Nagapattinam.2. The Germane Plaint Scenario:(i)The Appellant/Plaintiff's adopted deceased father Subbiah Mudaliar has been a big landlord at Kurukathi Village in Thiruvarur Taluk. The 9 tanks mentioned in the Plaint schedule have been in enjoyment of the Plaintiff's family for the past 50-60 years. When the Village Panchayat Act of 19...
R.Kumaravelu Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
APPEAL under Section 27A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 against the order dated 24.5.2005 made in W.T.A.No.67/Mds/2004 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench for the assessment year 1992-93.O R D E R(The Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J. )1. The assessee is on appeal as against the order of the Tribunal, raising the following substantial questions of law:"(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, there was any failure on the part of the appellant to disclose fully and truly all the material facts necessary for assessment for the assessment year 1992-93 ?(2) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that Section 17 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 had been rightly invoked in the case of the appellant for the said assessment year ?(3) Whether the Tribunal was right in its conclusion that the appellant was assessable under item (2) Part I of Schedule 1 of the Wealth Tax Act, when the Trust was admittedly assessed under Secti...
Perumal. Vs. State Rep.by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the Judgment and conviction dated 29.09.2009 made in S.C.No.265 of 2007 on the file of the Mahalir Court, Salem.P.DEVADASS,J,.1. The appellant is accused in S.C.No.265 of 2007 on the file of Mahalir Court, Salem. For convenience sake, in this judgment, let us call the appellant as accused.2. The accused is alleged to have criminally trespassed into the house of complainant Ananthi, a minor girl and raped her.3. To establish this allegations, prosecution examined P.Ws.1 to 18, marked Exs.P1 to P14.4. When the accused has been examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C., on the incriminating aspects in the prosecution evidence, he had denied his complicity in this case. However, he did not examine any witness nor mark any document.5. On 29.09.2009, the trial Court convicted and sentenced him as under:-Sl.No.ConvictionSentence1. Under Section 451 IPC.2 Years R.I and fine Rs.1,000/- in default 3 months R.I.2. Under Secti...
Thirumuruga Kirubananda Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to sanction lease of land on which the petitioner sangam is maintaining the Thirumuruga Kirubananda Variyar Aided High School, at Kumarasamy Pettai, Dharmapuri, pursuant to and in terms of the Resolution dated 09.06.2011 passed by the Sub Collector, Dharmapuri.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to sanction lease of land, where the petitioner Sangam is running Thirumuruga Kirubananda Variyar Aided High School, Kumarasamipettai, Dharmapuri, in view of Resolution dated 09.06.2011, passed by the Peace Committee constituted by the Sub Collector, Dharmapuri.2. The petitioner is running the school since 1947 under the name and style of Thirumuruga Kirubananda Variyar Aided High School, Kumarasamipettai, Dharmapuri. 1500 students are studying in ...
Major V.T.Nair Vs. the State of Tamilnadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
Common Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first and second respondents culminated in G.O.Ms.No.144 PD & SI Department, dated 27.8.2010 and G.O.Ms.No.45 PD and SI Department, dated 2.2.2011 and quash the same and direct the respondents to pay compensation at market value of the property forthwith and pass such further or other orders.C O M M O N O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ of Certiorari, to quash G.O.Ms.No.144 PD & SI Department, dated 27.8.2010 and G.O.Ms.No.45 PD and SI Department, dated 2.2.2011 and direct the respondents to pay compensation at market value of the property forthwith, and pass such further or other orders to which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit.2.The petitioner on an earlier occasion had filed W.P.No.3501 of 2011, praying for a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining the responden...
D.P.Nandakumar. Vs. the Superintending Engineer.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation/application dated 16.12.2011 and to issue E.B. Connection in favour of the petitioner and to pass orders on the representation within the stipulated period.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation/application dated 16.12.2011 and to issue E.B. Connection in favour of the petitioner and to pass orders on the representation within the stipulated period.2. Mr.P.Gunaraj, learned counsel representing Mr.G.Vasudevan, takes notice on behalf of the respondents electricity board. By consent the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. Mr.P.Gunaraj, learned counsel for the respondents on instruction from the first respondent Assistant Engineer, who is present in...
P.J.Murthy Vs. P.A.Sundari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
Civil revision petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 as amended by Act 23/73 and 1 of 1980 against the judgment and decree dated 22.11.2011 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Ranipet in R.C.A.No.2 of 2009 in confirming the order and decree dated 28.11.2008 passed by the learned District Munsif, Sholingur in RCOP No.2 of 2006.ORDER1. Animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 22.11.2011 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Ranipet in R.C.A.No.2 of 2009 in confirming the order and decree dated 28.11.2008 passed by the learned District Munsif, Sholingur in RCOP No.2 of 2006, this civil revision petition has been focussed by the tenant.2. The parties, for convenience sake, are referred to here under according to their litigative status and ranking before the Rent Controller.3. Broadly but briefly, narratively but precisely, the germane facts, absolutely necessary for the disposal of this civil revision petition would ...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »