Chennai Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mrs.Devaki Ammal Vs. State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Prayer :-Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set-aside the order dated 07.10.2008 in Crl.M.P.No.356 of 2007 in Special C.C.No.1 of 2005 on the file of the learned Special Judge-I / X Additional Judge, Chennai.ORDER1. The nutshell of the case are as follows:-The revision petitioner / accused No.12 has stated that she is an innocent person and her name was falsely implicated in Crime No.9/AC/96/HQ for the offences under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act and under Section 109 of IPC, on the file of respondent Police. The petitioner further submitted that she had purchased the properties in the city of Chennai as early as in the year 1985. But, the prosecution case is that the said properties had been purchased by A1 in the name of the revision petitioner. In the absence of relevant documents, a false case has been filed against the revision petitioner. Therefore, the revision petitioner has sought befo...
Pasumai Thayagam Poo Vyabarigal Sangam. Vs. the State of Tamilnadu Rep ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition came to be numbered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to offer police protection to the petitioners' members enabling them to sell the flowers in the Tirukoilur Town without fear or threat in accordance to the right conferred on them under Article 19 of the Constitution of India and pass such further or other orders.O R D E R:1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to offer police protection to the members of the petitioner Association, enabling them to sell the flowers in the Tirukoilur Town, without fear or threat, in accordance with the right conferred on them, under Article 19 of the Constitution of India.2. In support of the prayer, the petitioner has sworn affidavit which reads as under:" I am the petitioner herein and as such am acquainted with facts of the case. I am the President of Pasumai Thay...
Santhakumar Vs. Kumaresan and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Civil revision petition preferred seeking early disposal of I.A.No.882 of 2011 in O.S.No.560 of 2011 on the file of the First Additional District Munsif of Coimbatore, within a time frame.ORDER1. Seeking early disposal of I.A.No.882 of 2011 in O.S.No.560 of 2011 on the file of the First Additional District Munsif of Coimbatore, this civil revision petition is focussed.2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the lower Court.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit before this Court that the CRP is focussed purely for the purpose of obtaining direction from this Court to the effect that the First Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore should dispose of I.A.No. 882 of 2011 as expeditiously as possible, as according to the learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff, the matter is being delayed even though it is an urgent one.5. As of now, I do not want to pass any remark...
A.Kamaraj Vs. the Secretary of Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for writs of Certiorari, calling for the records of the proceedings in letter Nos.10756/2011-9 and 10756/2011-7 dated 20.1.2012 issued by the respondent and quash them as against the petitioner.C O M M O N O R D E R1. The Associate Editor of a Tamil bi-weekly magazine by name "Nakkeeran" has come up with the above writ petitions challenging two notices issued by the Privileges Committee of the Tamil Nadu State Legislative Assembly.2. I have heard Mr.P.T.Perumal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.S.Guru Krishna Kumar, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.Venkatesh, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent and and Mr.A.Navaneetha Krishnan, learned Advocate General appearing as amicus curie.3. In the issue dated January 7-10, 2012 of the said Tamil bi-weekly magazine, an article was published at page No.5 as a cover story with the front wrapper giving an indication of the story l...
N.Raju Reddy Vs. the District Elementary Educational Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition came to be numbered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of transfer of Original Application in O.A.No.7476 of 2001 to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.2923/A3/2001, dated 17.6.2001 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to promote the petitioner as Middle School Headmaster with effect from the date of the impugned order and grant him all consequential benefits.O R D E R:1. The petitioner is working as Headmaster in the Panchayat Union Elementary School, Pattakurichi, Mangalur Block, Cuddalore District. The petitioner was appointed as Headmaster on 14.10.1965. The petitioner after appointment acquired the qualification for M.A. in 1994, and passed B.Ed. Examination in May 1996. The petitioner acquired the qualification through the Open University of Annamalai University.2. The petitioner submits, that as the petitioner had the qualification of M.A. and B.Ed., he was fully qualified...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. E.Ponnurangam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Prayer :- Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree made in MACTC OP No.3587 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (II Judge, Court of Small Causes) at Chennai, dated 15.12.2009.COMMON JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.Mohan Ram, J.,)1. Being aggrieved by the award, dated 15.12.2009, passed in MACT OP No.3587 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (II Judge, Court of Small Causes), Chennai, the insurer has filed CMA No.918 of 2010. Not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, the claimant has filed CMA No.1235 of 2010.2. In respect of the injuries sustained by the claimant in a road accident that took place on 19.07.2007 involving the motor cycle bearing Registration No.TN07-AT-7191 belonging to the claimant and the Tata Sumo Car bearing Registration No.TN22-AT-6685 belonging to the first respondent in CMA No.918 of 2010, th...
Govindan, Vs. Represented by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Prayer :-Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the judgment dated 08.12.2009 made in C.A.No.35 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Villupuram, confirming the judgment dated 28.10.2009 made in C.C.No.216 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Kallakurichi and set-aside the same.ORDER1. The brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows:-On 19.01.2008, at about 6.30 p.m., the defacto complainant had proceeded to Kharadi Chittoor to attend a death funeral. At that time, the first and second accused had picked a wordy quarrel with him and thereafter, the second accused had beaten the defacto complainant with log wood and the first accused inflicted injuries on the head of the complainant. In the result, he had sustained simple injuries. Thereafter, the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.29 of 2008, on the file of Kachirapalayam Police Station for the offence under Section ...
M.Baskar Vs. Bar Council of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the resolution passed in extra ordinary General Body meeting on 08.04.2011 from the file of 2nd Respondent and quash the same as unconstitutional.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. It has been stated that the petitioner was enrolled as an Advocate, on 17.4.1985, bearing roll No.223/85. He had been elected as the President of the Vellore Bar Association, for four terms. However, a resolution had been passed in the General Body meeting of the said Association, which is the second respondent herein, on 8.4.2011. In the said resolution, it had been stated that no member of the second respondent Association could hold a post for more than two terms. If a member had served as an office bearer of the second respondent Association, for a period of two ter...
P.R.Manickam. Vs. State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Prayer :-Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set-aside the order dated 07.10.2008 in Crl.M.P.No.341 of 2007 in Special C.C.No.1 of 2005 on the file of the learned Special Judge-I / X Additional Judge, Chennai.ORDER1. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-The revision petitioner / accused No.18 had filed a discharge petition in Crl.M.P.No.341 of 2007 in Special C.C.No.1 of 2005, on the file of X Additional Judge / Special Judge-I, Chennai stating that the respondent had filed a criminal case in Cr.No.No.9/AC/96/HQ for the offences under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act and under Section 109 of IPC. While the case is pending on the file of the learned judge, the accused had filed this petition stating that he had not abetted the accused No.1, as alleged in the final report. The petitioner further stated that there are no material proof to show that he had abetted Thiru.S.Kannappan to acquire assets i...
Muthu Cycle Stores Vs. M.Dhanajayan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Petition filed under section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 against the Judgment and decree dated 11.08.2009 made in RCA.54 of 2008 on the file of the VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai, confirming the order and decreetal order dated 27.11.2007 made in RCOP.No.1381 of 2006 on the file of the XI Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.O R D E R1. This revision is directed against the order passed by the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority in RCA.No.54 of 2008 dated 11.08.2009 confirming the eviction order passed by the learned Rent Controller made in RCOP.No.1381 of 2006 dated 27.11.2007.2. The Revision Petitioner herein was the respondent / tenant and the respondent herein was the petitioner / landlord before the learned Rent Controller.3. For convenience sake, the status of the parties as landlord and tenant are maintained in this judgment.4. The brief facts of the case of the petitioner / landlord before the Rent Controller would be as fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »