Chennai Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr.B.Vijayaraghavan and ors. Vs. the District Collector Dharmapuri Dis ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-24-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents herein to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 27.08.2011, and consequently direct the Respondents to disburse to the petitioners the compensation amount of Rs.2,44,274/- awarded in their father's name together with accrued interest in respect of the lands acquired comprised in S.No.538/2 measuring an extent of 2.01.5 Hectares in Nagamarai Village, Pennakaram Taluk, and Dharmapuri District under the Land Acquisition Act 1994 in pursuance to the Award No.2 of 2003 dated 20.11.2003.M.JAICHANDREN, J.ORDER1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.2. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners had submitted that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 27.08.2011, o...
K.Narayanan Vs. M.G.Mahalingam,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-24-2012
Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to restore the petitioner's building unlawfully demolished by him in S.No.148-31 C in Melakottaiyur Village, Kancheepuram District and pay to the petitioner suitable compensation. S.MANIKUMAR, J.ORDER1. The petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to restore the petitioner's building unlawfully demolished by him in S.No.148-31 C in Melakottaiyur Village, Kancheepuram District and to pay suitable compensation. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that his paternal uncle constructed a house measuring 250 sq.ft in S.No.148-31C in Melakottaiyur Village, Kancheepuram District in 1989. House tax was levied in his name by Melakottaiyur Panchayat and that he was paying the same. Later, the house was transferred in the name of the petitioner in 1994 and that he has been in possession and enjoyment and that...
J. Pandiyarajan. Vs. the Manager, Indian Overseas Bank and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-24-2012
Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the rejection of claim of the petitioner for education loan in reference NO.Nil dated 13.02.2012 on the file of the first respondent quash the same and direct the first respondent to receive the Education Loan application of the petitioner and provide education loan to the petitioner for studying B.E (Mechanical) in the second respondent University.M.JAICHANDREN, J.ORDER1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels, appearing on behalf of the first and second respondents.2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent had submitted that the application of the petitioner, for the grant of an educational loan, had not been considered, only on the ground that he had been admitted in the second respondent University, under the "Management Quota".3. Per Contra...
V. Pandiarajan Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distributio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-24-2012
Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to confirm and restore the petitioner's seniority list Annual List of Class I Officers (Technical and Non Technical) as on 01.01.2007 as S.No.20 in the list of Executive Engineers (Electrical) and corrected as on 01.01.2010 and 01.08.2011 from which the petitioner was duly promoted as Superintending Engineer (Electrical) and consider his promotion as Chief Engineer (Electrical) on and from 08.07.2010 ignoring the panel of names for promotion as per the lists dated 08.07.2010, 26.03.2011 and 31.12.2011 as well s the consequent promotions of respondents thereof and consequently further promote the petitioner as Chief Engineer (Electrical) with effect form 08.07.2010 with all consequential service benefits. M.JAICHANDREN, J.ORDER1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the peti...
Sri Venkateswara Educational and Charitable Trust Vs. the Secretary to ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-24-2012
K.CHANDRU, J.This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned notification issued by the first respondent herein under sub section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act 1997 in G.O.Ms.No.93, Industries (SIPCOT -LA) Department, dated 14.7.2010 insofar as the petitioner's trust land mentioned below is concerned and the connected order of the sixth respondent dated 13.9.2010 issued under sub section (2) of Section 4 of the Act directing the handing over of the possession of lands of the Trust to the Collector within the time specified thereon and quash the same and forbear the respondents from taking possession of the trust lands belonging to the petitioner trust in the following survey number situated in Mathur village, Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.ORDER1. The writ petition was filed by the petition...
Y.Koteeswariah and anr. Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-24-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent having reference No.CMWSSB/P&A/STF/RA1/33314/2010,dated 16.09.2010 containing the panel for promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer for the year 2010-2011 and quash the same in so far as the name of the 3rd Respondent is included in the 5th place in the panel overlooking the seniority of the Petitioner vis a vis the 3rd Respondent if reckoned from the date of 1st appointment into service and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd Respondents to place the Petitioner in the 5th place the panel drawn for promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer in the 1st Respondent Board for the year 2010-2011.This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertainin...
K.Valliammal. Vs. the District Collector Vellore District.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-24-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from granting permission, or licence to anyone to run the market in the petitioner's patta land, bearing Survey Nos.725/3A, 725/3B, 725/3C, 725/3D, 725/3E and Survey No.722/1B1 and Survey No.722/1B2 bearing patta No.529 situated at Itchiputhur village, Arakonam Taluk, Vellore District, consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from her above said patta land without due process of law.R.SUDHAKAR, J.ORDER1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from granting permission, or licence to anyone to run the market in the petitioner's patta land, bearing Survey Nos.725/3A, 725/3B, 725/3C, 725/3D, 725/3E and Survey No.722/1B1 and Survey No.722/1B2 bearing patta No.529 situated at Itchiputhur village, Arakonam Taluk, Vellore District, consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess th...
M.Ramasamy Vs. the Transport Commissioner.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-24-2012
PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order passed by the respondent vide Proc.R.No. 8141/R1/2011(E.O.No.302/2011) dated 20.09.2011 in so far as denying the petitioner's promotion as Motor Vehicle Inspector (NT) and consequently direct the respondent to include the petitioner's name in the panel of Superintendents fit for promotion as Motor Vehicle Inspectors (NT) drawn for the year 2011-2012 in the appropriate place with due seniority and promote the petitioner as Motor Vehicle Inspector (NT) with effect from 20.09.2011, the date of promotion of his immediate junior with all consequential service and monetary benefits.K.SHARMA, J.ORDER1. The petitioner being aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent vide R.No.8141/R1/2011 (E.O.No.302/2011) dated 20.09.2011 denying the right of consideration to the petitioner for promotion to Motor Vehicle Inspector (NT), has approac...
T.K.Kalyana Sundaram and ors. Vs. the State of Tamilnadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-24-2012
COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for all the relevant records pertaining to the orders passed by the 1st respondent herein vide his proceedings No.Letter No.39631/M1/2011, dated 04.07.2011 (in W.P.Nos.11669 to 11673, 11675, 11676 & 11678 of 2012) and 15.04.2011 (in W.P.Nos.11674, 11677 of 2012) and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, being violative of rules and principles of natural justice and thereby direct the respondents to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.NO.216 Finance (PC) Department, dated 22.3.1993 and accordingly award Selection/Special grade scale of pay with effect from 01.06.1988 and revise pensionary benefits and pay arrears to the petitioners.N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J.COMMON ORDER1. The common prayer in all the Writ Petitions is to quash the respective impugned orders dated 04.07.2011 (in W.P.Nos.11669 to 11673, 11675, 11676 & 11678 of 2012) an...
Ms.Sumit Road Carriers Fleet Owners Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Offi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-23-2012
Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Respondent in this proceedings in G.D.No.253/2011-12 dated 2.2.2012 and quash this detenion order as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the TNVAT Act and direct the Respondent to release the goods and relevant original invoices and documents by collecting security as per Rule 15(6)(a)&(b) of Tamilnadu VAT Rules and pass such further or other order or orders as this Honble Court.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for taxes, appearing on behalf of the respondent.2. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. In view of the similar orders passed by this Court, in a number of writ petitions, including the order, dated 21.12.2010, made in W.P.No.29050 of 2010, the following order is passed:i) The petitioner shall pay the amount of tax of Rs.3,48,560/- demanded by the authority, w...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »