Chennai Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Rasipuram Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd. Vs. the Deputy Registrar of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
W.P.No.9763 of 2008 is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in his Na.Ka.No.6388/07 Pa.Tho(11), dated 25.02.2008 and consequential proceedings of the second respondent dated 18.3.2008 and quash the same by declaring that the petitioner Bank is not a public authority as defined under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act.W.P.No.24746 of 2009 is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in Case No.14378/Enquiry/09, dated 16.11.2009 and quash the same.W.P.No.16041 of 2010 is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the Tamil Nadu Information Commission in Case No.1001814/Enquiry/2010, dated 16.6.2010 and quash the same by declaring that the petitioner bank is not a public authority as defined...
Ms. Sivanandha Mills Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
Prayer in Writ Petition.Nos.6608 of 2012:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records, in notices under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act in PAN No.AAKCS7439J/2009-10, dated 06.03.2012,on the file of the first respondent herein and to quash the same and to direct the second respondent to dispose of the application dated 12.3.2012, filed by the Assessee under Section 220 (6) of Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking non enforcement of demand pending disposal of Appeal pending before the second respondent.Prayer in Writ Petition No.6609 of 2012:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records, in notice of demand under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act in PAN No.AAKCS7439J/2009-10, dated 31.12.2011, and to quash the same.COMMON O R D E R1. This judgment shall dispose of the following Writ Petitions, viz., :-Sl.No....
Mr.S.Mani Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
Prayer in Writ Petition No.9515 of 2007:-This Writ Petition came to be numbered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of transfer of O.A.No.1834 of 2002 from the file of the Tamil Administrative Tribunal, with a prayer for for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to fix the pay of the petitioner in the post of Primary School Head Master for the period 13.3.1995 to 12.6.1995, and in the post of Middle School Headmaster from 13.6.1995 onwards and grant him all consequential benefits.Prayer in Writ Petition No.8309 of 2007:-This Writ Petition came to be numbered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of transfer of O.A.No.1835 of 2002 from the file of the Tamil Administrative Tribunal, with a prayer for for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to fix the pay of the petitioner in the post of Middle School Head Master for the period 13.6.1995 to 24.1.2001, and grant him all consequential benefits, including payment...
D.Thiruvengadam Vs. Sivarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
First appeal filed under Section 94(4) of Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 30.9.2008 in O.S.No.29 of 2005 on the file of the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Vellore.J U D G M E N T1. This First Appeal is filed under Section 94(4) of Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 30.9.2008 in O.S.No.29 of 2005 on the file of the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Vellore.2. The first defendant is the appellant. The plaintiff/first respondent filed a Suit for recovery of money.3. Following are the allegations contained in Plaint:(a)The 2nd defendant is the son of 1st defendant. The first defendant is the 'kartha' of the family and in the joint family, the first defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- on 10.5.1999 from the plaintiff, agreeing to repay the same along with interest at the rate of 2% p.a. and also executed a promissory note in this regard. On 25.6.2002, the first defendant admitted the...
The Commissioner of Income Tax. Vs. Ms. T.T.G.industries Limited.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
Tax Case Appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai B Bench, dated 15.9.2003 passed in I.T.A.No. 1670/Mds/1996.JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J)1. The Revenue is on appeal as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to assessment year 1992-93. The above Tax Case (Appeal) was admitted on the following substantial question of law :-"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that, service charges for maintenance, charges for transportation, erection and commission charges, labour charges, sale of scraps during manufacturing to be included as profits and gains of the industrial undertaking for the purpose of computation of deduction under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act?2. The assessee herein is engaged in the manufacture of coke-oven and goose neck cleaning system for steel and other industries. The Assessing Officer while computing ...
K.Gunasekaran. Vs. the Additional Principal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the fourth respondent in Letter No.2 Po/E.Pa/Pettai/Ko.Thani.A.No.007/12 dated 18.4.2012 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents in any way insisting for licence from the respondent Forest Department for providing Electricity connection in M.E.No.1046 and other amenities for running the petitioner's sawmill until the disposal of the petitioner's application dated 21.4.2010 for grant of Licence is made under the provisions of Tamilnadu Regulation of Wood Based Industries Rules, 2010 and relevant laws.O R D E R1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the fourth respondent in Letter No.2 Po/E.Pa/Pettai/Ko.Thani.A.No.007/12 dated 18.4.2012 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents in any way insisting for licence ...
M.S.Sivasubramani Vs. the Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the second respondent relating to the orders in (1) No.E5/9680/STC/93, dated 28.6.1993; (2) No.E1/22789/ACT/93, dated 13.10.1999 and No.E1/0810/TNSTC (Salem)/2011, dated 17.12.2011 to quash the same and to issue consequential directions to the respondents to grant benefits of continuity of service, pay protection and attendant benefits to the petitioner from the date of discharge from duty as Conductor on 28.6.1993 to the date of re-appointment as Office Attender on 13.10.1993 in the light of provisions of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act 1995.O R D E R1. The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the orders dated 28.6.1993, 13.10.1993 and 17.12.2011 and direct the respondents to grant benefits of continuity of service, pay protection and attendant benefits ...
Muthusamy Vs. Krishnasamy and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
This civil revision petition is preferred under Section 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal orders dated 07.12.2007 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode in I.A.No.96 of 2007 in A.S.No.17 of 2008 (transferred from the file of the Subordinate Judge, Namakkal I.A.No.96 of 2007 in A.S.No.120 of 2002).ORDER1. Inveighing and challenging the order dated 07.12.2007 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode in I.A.No.96 of 2007 in A.S.No.17 of 2008 [transferred from the file of the Subordinate Judge, Namakkal I.A.No.96 of 2007 in A.S.No.120 of 2002 and re-numbered], this civil revision petition is focussed.2. A summation and summarisation of the relevant facts, absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this revision petition would run thus:(i) The revision petitioner herein filed the suit seeking the following reliefs:To pass a judgment and decree- to declare the plaintiff's right of use over the suit "A,B,C,D" lane situated in...
N. Kamarasu Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in Letter No. 1030/ NIR 6 (1)/2010 dated 06.09.2010 on the file of the second respondent and quash the last para of the order denying regularisation of service of the petitioner in view of G.O. Ms. No.22 dated 28.02.2006 and direct the second respondent to appoint and regularise the petitioner as Technical Assistant in the third respondent office in consonance with the order passed by the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) C.C. No. 14093 of 2010 dated 27.09.2010.ORDER1. The prayer in this writ petition is for a Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the order passed by the second respondent in Letter No. 1030/ NIR 6 (1)/2010 dated 06.09.2010 in so far as it denies the claim of regularisation of the petitioner as per G.O. Ms. No.22 dated 28.02.2006 and direct the second respondent to appoint and regularise the petitioner as Technical Assistant in the third respondent o...
R.Naser Vs. the Director Directorate of Distance Education
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue the corrected First Year Mark Statement of the petitioner based on his recent representation dated 21.11.2011.O R D E R1. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents had submitted that the corrected first year mark sheet statement of the petitioner had already been handed over to the petitioner.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had not refuted that the said mark sheet statement had been received by the petitioner.3. Therefore, since, no further orders are necessary, the writ petition stands closed. No costs....
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »