Chennai Court February 2012 Judgments
Ms. Shanmugapriya Granites Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to appoint a Competent Officer to conduct Spot inspection of the mining operation and to take measurement of the stone tablets and made necessary entries in the register enabling petitioner to carry on the business of mining in consonance with the lease agreement dated 04.02.2008 forthwith in respect of the ryotwari land measuring 1.00.0 Hectare in Survey No.172/1A (P) at Addakuriki Village Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for both sides.2. The main contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the third respondent had given oral instructions, to the petitioner, to stop quarrying operations in the land comprised in Survey No.172/1A (P) at Addakuriki Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District, measuring 1.00.0 Hectare.3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ...
Tag this Judgment!Ms.P.A.E.Ltd Vs. the Assistant Commissioner (Ct)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN No.33360600081/2007-08, dated 3.11.2011 and quash the same as illegal.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the impugned order of the respondent, dated 3.11.2011, in so far as it relates to the issue relating to the reversal of the Input Tax Credit, in respect of the stock transfer and the corresponding penalty imposed thereon, under Section 27(4) of the Tamilnadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, has to be set aside, in view of the fact that the notice, dated 25.5.2011, issued by the respondent, does not contain any proposal relating to the said issue.3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had also accepted the said contention made on beh...
Tag this Judgment!V.Natesan Vs. P.K.Periyathambi and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
PRAYER: This petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No. 6501 of 2001 from the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the orders passed by the respondents 2 & 3 in their Proc. Lr.No.Ser.3(1)/36382/ 95(SR) dated 8.12.2000 and Roc.46430/2000-3/A2 dated 16.8.2001 Roc.46430/2- 1(A2) dated 17.8.2001 respectively.O R D E R1. The petitioners being aggrieved by the reversion from the post of Deputy Tahsildar, had approached this Court, with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order of reversion.2 The petitioners were inducted to the cadre of Assistant by way of promotion from the post of Junior Assistant. The person holding qualification of graduation are appointed as Assistant directly. The next channel of promotion to the post of Assistant is to the post of Deputy Tahsildar. The petitioners seniority was fixed in the year 1992 and 1995.3 The State of Tamil Nadu in exercise ...
Tag this Judgment!A.Jenasenan Vs. the District Revenue Officer.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to dispose of the appeal dated 16.6.2010, pending before the first respondent, on merits, after hearing the concerned parties, within the time frame, as fixed by this Court.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court, with a prayer for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Mandamus, directing the District Revenue Officer, viz., the first respondent herein, to dispose of the Appeal, dated 16th June, 2010, on merits, after hearing the parties.2. The petitioner, along with two others, purchased land, measuring 22.240 sq.ft., comprised in S.No.414/1, which is part of Mylapore Division, Block No.8, Mylapore Triplicane Taluk, Madras District from Mr.T.V.Hari and others, vide a registered sale deed, dated 24.07.2006. The sale deed was registered, as Document No.2294 of 2006 with the Office of the Sub-Registrar, Mylapore. The petitioner, after purchase...
Tag this Judgment!T.R.K.Karthick Vs. Sumathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C praying to call for the records of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Madurai in Crl.M.P.No.4011 of 2011 in STC No.2681 of 2005, dated 20.09.2011 and to set aside the same.ORDER1. Heard both sides. Records were also perused.2.The de-facto complainant in a case instituted on the file of the trial court, namely the court of learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Madurai is the petitioner in the criminal revision case. He preferred a private complaint against the respondent alleging commission of an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, based on the dishonour of a cheque allegedly issued by the respondent in discharge of a debt due to the petitioner/complainant. The learned Judicial Magistrate, following the procedure prescribed for taking cognizance of case on private complaint took it on file as STC No.2681 of 2005 and issued process.3.On appearance, the respondent herein/accused denied havin...
Tag this Judgment!Tamadevi Jalasundaram Vs. the Special Transport Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
PRAYER: This petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No. 6891 of 2001 from the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order of the respondent in R.No.1/9481/2000, dated 15.05.2000, with consequential relief of issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, to direct the respondent to include the petitioner's name in the panel of Assistants fit for promotion to the post of Superintendent for the year 2000-2001 not taking into consideration of the pendency of the Criminal Appeal No.828/1996, pending before the Hon'ble High Court.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order of the respondent No.R.No.R1/9481/2000, dated 15.05.2000, with consequential relief of issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, to direct the respondent to include the petitioner's name in the panel of Assistants fit for promotion to the pos...
Tag this Judgment!T.Lakshmikanthan Vs. Union of India Rep. by the General Manager.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order dated 16.12.2011 of the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.1360 of 2010 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 4 to appoint the petitioner in an appropriate alternative post in clerk category falling under a CEY ONE category or any sedentary job by duly protecting Petitioner's grade pay of Rs.2000 in terms of the protection privileged in Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act 1995 on medical incapacitation.O R D E R(Order of the Court was made by Justice ELIPE DHARMA RAO)Challenging the order, dated 16.12.2011, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, in O.A.No.1360 of 2010, in dismissing the claim of the petitioner to quash the order, dated 19.10.2010 passed by the second respondent th...
Tag this Judgment!Malaichamy Vs. the Principal Secretary to Government.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
PrayerWrit petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the third and fourth respondents to forward the proposal of cancellation of the deferred punishment in PR No.24/2005 and 42/2006 and consequently direct the second respondent to forward the representation dated 09.02.2012 to the first respondent to include the petitioner in the panel of Inspectors fit for promotion as Deputy Superintendent of Police (Category I) for the year 2009-10.ORDER1. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. Heard Mr.R.Yashod Vardhan, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents.3. In this petition, a mandamus has been sought for seeking to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to forward the proposal of cancellation of the deferred punishment in PR No.24/2005 and 42/2006 and for a consequential direction to the second respondent to forward the representatio...
Tag this Judgment!Congregation of the Brothers Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
PRAYERPetition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the second respondent Director of School Education in Na.Ka.No.104064/G3/2004 dated 07.04.2005, quash the same insofar as the petitioner School is concerned, and further direct the respondents to sanction forthwith 09 additional posts to St.Joseph's Higher Secondary School, Muthupettai (06 Secondary Grade posts- now Middle Grade B.T, 1 Tamil Pandit and 2 P.E.Ts) in terms of G.O.Ms.No.525(School Education) dated 29.12.1997.ORDER1. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged proceedings of the second respondent dated 07.04.2005 and consequently seeking for a direction to sanction nine additional posts in terms of G.O.Ms.No.525 (School Education) dated 29.12.1997.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a Coordinator of the Schools of the Congregation of the Brothers of the Sacred Heart...
Tag this Judgment!Dr.K.Krishnaveni Vs. Ms. Madurai Jesuit Higher
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records culminating in the impugned proceedings of the second respondent dated 17/18.02.2009, in so far as the petitioner is concerned quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to restore the UGC scale of pay which was received by the petitioner from September, 2006 at the rate of Rs.10,000-325-15,200 scale and further revision of scale under Sixth Pay Commission which has been brought into effect by the respondent Management with effect from September 2009 with necessary pay benefits thereto including the arrears.O R D E R1. Heard M/s.G.Thilakavathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Issac Mohanlal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 4 and 5.2.At this stage of the hearing of the writ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »