Chennai Court February 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Fuller India Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-17-2012
W.P.No.14244 of 2002:This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in PA No.AAACFO448A/4-A, dated 22.3.2002 for the assessment year 1995-96, of the respondent and quash the same.W.P.No.14245 of 2002:This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in PA No.AAACFO448A/4-A, dated 22.3.2002 for the assessment year 1996-97, of the respondent and quash the same.C O M M O N O R D E R1. These writ petitions have been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to call for and quash the records relating to the impugned notices issued by the respondent, for the assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and quash the same.2. It has been stated that the petitioner is a company manufacturing cement machinery/equipment and it is engaged in the business of tur...
A.Ulaganathan Vs. the District Manager
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-17-2012
PrayerWrit petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the tender notice dated 01.02.2012 made in Na.Ka.No.C.V.9/30/12 and quash the said proceedings dated 01.02.2012 and consequently directing the respondent to issue a fresh tender notice in terms of Rule 10(1) of the Tamil Nadu Liquor Retail Vending (in Shops and Bars) Rules, 2003 by inserting the tender conditions viz., obtaining the non objection certificate from the owner of the building situated adjoining IMFS shop No.11842 located at 31, 32 Municipal Shopping Comples, Shivan Koil North, Sivakasi, so as to enable the petitioner to participate in the tender after obtaining the tender application from the respondent.COMMON ORDER1. By consent, the writ petitions itself are taken up for disposal at the admission stage.2. Heard Mr.A.Jenasenan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.M.Muniyasami learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.3. Challenging a t...
The District Social Welfare Officer. Vs. R.Aravind
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-17-2012
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Order dated 13.12.2006 made in M.C.O.P.No.3443 of 2000 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [IVth Small Causes Court], Chennai.JUDGMENT1. Aggrieved by the award of compensation by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (IV Small Causes Court), Chennai in the judgment dated 13.12.2006 made in M.C.O.P.No.2108 of 2009 for the injuries sustained by the Respondent, the Appellant has preferred this appeal.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-On 23.1.2000 at about 22.45 hours when the Respondent was travelling as pillion rider in motor cycle bearing registration No.TN 05 C 3765 from west to East in II Avenue, Anna Nagar, near the junction of III Main Road, the Jeep bearing registration No. TN 01 G.1113 belonging to Respondent was driven rashly and negligently in high speed from East to West in the same road and turned right without watching the on coming vehicle and hit against the motor...
V.Jayabalan Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-17-2012
PRAYER IN W.P.NO.38445/2004: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order of the 3rd respondent in O.Mu.No.13746/B2/2004 dated 08.12.2004 and quash the same and direct the 3rd respondent to approve the transfer and appointment as Headmaster in the YMCA Boys Town Higher Secondary School, Kottivakkam, Chennai 41, together with all monetary benefits. PRAYER IN W.P.NO.1748/2006: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the termination order dated 06.01.2006 of the first respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the first and second respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with continuity of service and all monetary benefits.COMMON ORDER1. The petitioner in both the writ petitions is the same person. Both the writ p...
Karthikeyan Vs. the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-17-2012
Prayer : Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in respect of impugned part of the award dated 3.3.2005 passed by the 1st respondent herein in I.D.No.181 of 2002 that had not granted backwages and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant backwages and other benefits to the petitioner.O R D E R1. The petitioner is a workman employed under the 2nd respondent Tamil Nadu State owned Transport Corporation having its Headquarters at Coimbatore. In this Writ Petition, he has come forward to challenge a portion of the award in I.D.No.181 OF 2002 denying backwages. In the said award, the Labour Court while granting reinstatement of the petitioner with continuity of service denied the backwages.2. Subsequent to the award, it transpires that the petitioner was reinstated in service. The petitioner has not explained as to why he has never reserved his right to file a Writ Petition challenging that port...
Madras High Court Yugei Traders Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-17-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue the sale bills with the name and address of the stockyard of the petitioner namely Yugei Traders, situated at S.No.89/3, measuring an extent of 1.08 acres in Vannivedu village, Walajah Taluk, Vellore District in the bills issued by the second respondent for any permitted vehicles namely, lorry, tractor and licensed bullock carts.O R D E R1. Mr.M.L.Mahendran, the learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents.2. With the consent of the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, this writ petition is taken up for disposal.3. It has been stated that the petitioner is doing business as a dealer in sand and other building materials. The petitioner is a registered dealer in the records of the sales tax department of the government of Tamil Nadu. Since, the bills issued by the second respondent do not conta...
S.G.Lokesh Kumar Vs. Appellate Authority and Joint
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-17-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in his letter No.A3/4804/2011, dated 30.12.2011, and order of the second respondent in his proceedings Order No.B2/27885/2011 dated 19.10.2011 quash the same and to direct the second respondent to forthwith return the original driving licence bearing No.TN 02200-80000755 to the petitioner herein.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for both sides.2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned letter of the first respondent, dated 30.12.2011, and the proceedings of the second respondent, dated 19.10.2011. The petitioner had also prayed for a direction to the second respondent to return the original driving licence, bearing No.TN 02200-80000755 to the petitioner.3. It had been stated that the petitioner, who has a valid driving licence, was driving the Ford Fiesta Car...
S.Rajasekaran Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-16-2012
W.P.Nos.24460 and 24461 of 2011 are preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to RCA 54/2010, dated 2.11.2010 of the second respondent and quash the same.COMMON ORDER1. Both writ petitions came to be posted before this court on being specially ordered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice.2.The petitioners in both writ petitions are the son and wife of one Sambandam. In these two writ petitions, the contentions raised are identical, i.e., two petitioners want to challenge the communication, dated 02.11.2010 issued by the Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), SIPCOT Orgadam and Irungattukottai Expansion Schemes and seek to quash the same.3.When the matter came up for final hearing on 31.01.2012, the counsel appearing for the SIPCOT stated that the matter cannot be heard without the SIPCOT being made as a party as they are the requesitioning body and that they are the necessa...
Jegatha Madhubala Vs. the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-16-2012
W.P.No.22231 of 2010 is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to Section 3(1) notification under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 issued by the first respondent published at pages 7-9 of Part II Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette No.209, dated 13.7.2010 in respect of the petitioners' land in S.Nos.182/1A, 182/1B, 182/1C, 182/1D, 182/1E, 182/2 and 187/3 and the consequential E-Form notice issued by the third respondent dated 18.8.2010 and quash the same. W.P.No.22232 of 2010 is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to Section 3(1) notification under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 issued by the first respondent published at pages 7-8 of Part II Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette No.211, dated 14...
M.Rajamani Vs. the Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-16-2012
Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner interest for the retiral benefits viz., Rs.2,52,351/- (Rupees Two lakhs fifty two thousand and three hundred and fifty one only) due to EL & UEL and Rs.4,16,192/- (Rupees Four lakhs sixteen thousand and one hundred and ninety two only) due to the pension arrears including communtation of pensiion for the period respectively from 01.10.2004 to 12.11.2009 and from 30.09.32004 to 02.03.2010 at a rate as may be fixed.O R D E R1. Petitioner prays for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus, to direct the respondents to pay to the petitioner interest on the retiral benefits i.e., Rs.2,52,351/- (Rupees Two lakhs fifty two thousand and three hundred and fifty one only) due to the petitioner under the unutilised leave and Rs.4,16,192/- (Rupees Four lakhs sixteen thousand and one hundred and ninety two only) due to the pension arrears i...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »