Chennai Court December 2012 Judgments

M. Dhanabakkiam Vs. M. Mayavathi and Others

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree of the learned III Additional Sub Judge, Erode dated 17.02.2012 made in A.S. No. 68 of 2009 confirming the Judgment and Decree of the II Additional District Munsif, Erode dated 17.08.2009 in O.S.No.200 of 2006.) 1. The sole plaintiff in the original suit, who suffered a decree of dismissal of her suit in O.S.No.200 of 2006 dated 17.08.2009 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Erode, after unsuccessfully prosecuting the appeal before the lower Appellate court, namely, the court of the III Additional Sub Judge, Erode in A.S. No. 68 of 2009, has come forward with the present Second Appeal against the decree of the first Appellate Court dated 17.02.2012. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to, in accordance with their ranking had in their suit. 2. The plaintiff Dhanabakkiam, the 1st defendant Jayaselvi (since deceased), 2nd defendant Mayavathi and 3rd defenda...

S. Poothathan Vs. the Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Market ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(2)MLJ403

(Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of the first respondent bearing proceedings in Na.Ka.No.253/2011/AA3, dated 19.05.2011, confirming the order of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/8010/2010, dated 13.10.2010, quash the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service.) ORDER 1. The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service and quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.253/2011/AA3, dated 19.05.2011, confirming the order passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/8010/2010, dated 13.10.2010. 2. The petitioner was appointed as a Shop Salesman in Retail Vending Shops in Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC). While the petitioner was employed as a Shop Salesman in Retail Vending Shop No.436 at Shenoy Na...

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Jayanthi and Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)TNMAC63

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 08.02.2011 made in M.C.O.P.No.2565 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (IV Court of Small Causes), Chennai.) R.KARUPPIAH, J. 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the appellant/New India Assurance Company Limited, as against the judgment and decree dated 08.02.2011 passed by the learned IV Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, in M.C.O.P.No.2565 of 2006. 2. The respondents 1 to 4, who are the claimants 1 to 4 filed a claim petition before the Tribunal claiming compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- for the death of one Mr.R.Muthuraju in a road accident which occurred on 20.09.2005. 3. Briefly the case of the claimants is that on 20.09.2005 at about 10.00 a.m., while the deceased R.Muthuraju was going on his motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN-57-F-2319 at Ramavaram main road, near Srinivasa Engineering, Chennai, proceeding toward...

Ambattur Zone Residents Welfare Association, Rep. by Its President Mel ...

Court: Chennai

(PRAYERS: W.P.No.12929 of 2012 Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 10th respondent in P.P.P.D/L.O.No.16/2011 vide letter No.L1/4616/2011 dated 25.07.2011, and quash the same, and consequently, direct the respondents 1 to 19 to remove the encroachments made in tank bed lands comprised in S.No.583 in Ambattur by invoking the provisions of Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007, and restore the tank bed lands forthwith to protect the fundamental right to water and healthy environment as enshrined under Article 21 read with Articles 47, 48-A, 51-A(g) of the Constitution of India. W.P.No.30837 of 2012 Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent relating to G.O.(Ms.) No.1300, Revenue Department dated 29.04.1950, and quash the same, and ...

M/S Ramsays Corporation Private Limited Represented by Its Asst Genera ...

Court: Chennai

(Writ Petition No.31513 of 2012 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in TIN : 33430681183/2008-2009 and quash the impugned revised assessment order dated 9.10.2012 as passed contrary to the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and also against the principles of natural justice. Writ Petition No.31514 of 2012 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in TIN : 33430681183/2009-2010 and quash the impugned revised assessment order dated 11.10.2012 as passed contrary to the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and also against the principles of natural justice. Writ Petition No.31515 of 2012 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the impugned proceedings of the 1s...