Chennai Court November 2012 Judgments

Chloride Alloys (India) Limited, Karnataka Vs. Itus International Fze ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: This order shall dispose of A.No.2521 of 2012, 2522 of 2012 and 2945 of 2012, as the common question of fact and law are involved in all these applications. A.No.2521 of 2012: This application has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to furnish security for the suit claim of Rs.1,69,23,209/- (Rupees one crore sixty nine lakhs twenty three thousand two hundred and nine only); A.No. 2522 of 2012: This application has been filed with the prayer to furnish security to direct attachment of containers belonging to the defendants 2 to 5 upto maximum of 35 containers presently lying at the various locations as listed in detail in the schedule;) A.No.2945 of 2012: 1. This application has been filed for attachment of the bank account of the 5th respondent bearing Account No.222-0-526418-9 maintained with the Standard Chartered Bank, Mumbai, Garnishee. 2 In support of the applications, it is pleaded that the plaintiff/applicant had entered into a sales contract on 1.11.2011 with ...

B. Nallammal Vs. the Director of School Education, Chennai and Others

Court: Chennai

(Prayer in W.P.No.27377 of 2012: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to grant re-employment to the petitioner till the end of the academic year 2012-2013 (31.05.2013) as a B.T. Assistant (Science) from 31.10.2012 at Government High School, Maroorpatty, Namakkal District.) Common Order: 1. In all these five writ petitions, the petitioners are teachers employed in various schools as indicated in the following tabular column: ad>Sl.No.W.P.No.Name of the PetitionerSchool in which he/she is employedDate of retirement127377/12B.NallammalGovernmentHigh School, Maroorpatty, Namakkal District.31.10.2012227378/12K.JothiraniGovernment Girls Higher Secondary School, Thiruchangodu, Namakkal District.31.10.2012327397/12A.ParamasivamGovernment Higher Secondary School, Udyarpalayam, Rasipuram, Namakkal District.30.09.2012427398/12A.Mohamed EliasPanchayatUnion Middle School, S.K. Valavu, Veerapandi, Sa...

Aided Middle School Rep.by Its Correspondent Nagapattinam District Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer in W.P.No.18025 of 2012: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 1st respondent in G.O.Ms.No.4, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Program Department dated 06.01.2011 and quash the same and consequently directing the 1st respondent to select and appoint Noon Meal Organiser only from the panel sponsored by the Petitioner School Management.) COMMON ORDER: These are the strange cases filed by the managements of the private School running in Nagapattinam and other Districts. In these three Writ Petitions, the challenge made by the petitioners is the order passed by the State Government in G.O.Ms.No.4, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department dated 6.1.2011 and after setting aside the same seeks for a direction to select and appoint Noon Meal Organizers only from the panel sponsored by the petitioner management. 2. When Writ Petition Nos.18025 to 18...

P. Kasirajan Vs. Union of India, Rep.by the Director, Ministry of Pers ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(2)LLN195

(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the fifth respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his proceedings No.A/23456/GS/DIR/CAO/A-7(A) dated 06.05.2010 and proceedings No.A/23456/GS/DIR/CAO/A-7(A) dated 17.06.2010 and also the order of the fourth respondent bearing No.PU/Estt/NT10/2010-11/48 dated 21.05.2010 including the resolution of the third respondent bearing No.2010.103.47 and quash the same and direct the respondents to conduct direct recruitment for appointment to the post of Registrar of the third respondent viz. Pondicherry University and to consider the petitioner for such recruitment.) The petitioner has challenged the orders passed by the 5th respondent dated 6.5.2010 and 7.6.2010 and the order of the 4th respondent dated 21.5.2010 by which the 6th respondent was permanently absorbed in the 4th respondent University in the post...

M/S. S.R.S. Travels, Proprietor K.T. Rajashekar Vs. the State Transpor ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Writ Petition No.30316 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent and his Subordinates, namely, all Regional Transport Officers, Motor Vehicle Inspectors to accept Motor Vehicles Tax for Tamil Nadu at the rate of 1/10th of quarterly tax or one month tax or one quarter tax when tendered voluntarily by the petitioner or in advance for 7 days or 30 days or 90 days use in Tamil Nadu instead of collecting 7 days tax per entry into Tamil Nadu in respect of the petitioner's Vehicle - KA-42-9771. Writ Petition No.30317 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent and his Subordinates, namely, all Regional Transport Officers, Motor Vehicle Inspectors to accept Motor Vehicles Tax for Tamil Nadu at the rate of 1/10th of quarterly tax or one month tax or one quarter tax when tendered voluntarily by the petitioner or in advanc...

Osd Hrc Pipeline Engineers Pvt Ltd. Rep by Its Assistant General Manag ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)MLJ113

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for Notice Inviting Tender issued by the first respondent in News Paper "Times of India", Chennai Edition, dated 22.8.2012 as illegal, premature and quash the same consequently direct the first respondent to confirm the contract in pursuant to the earlier tender issued by the first respondent by dated 26.3.2012 on successful completion of technical and price bid respectively.) 1. This writ petition is filed seeing to quash the notification inviting tenders issued by the first respondent in the News Paper Times of India, Chennai Edition, dated 22.8.2012 and direct the first respondent to confirm the contract pursuant to the earlier tender issued by the first respondent on 26.3.2011 on successful completion of technical and price bid respectively. 2. Mr.K.M.Vijayan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner during the course of the arguments sub...

Dr. P. Murugesa Boopathi, the Vice Chancellor, Tamil Nadu Agricultural ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)CWC443

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the Fourth Respondent from conducting any enquiry against the Petitioner herein based upon the proceedings in DE.16/2009/AGRI/SIC, dated 6.1.2011.) 1. This Writ Petition at the instance of a former Personal Assistant to the Minister for Agriculture/former Vice Chancellor of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University seeks a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department, Chennai from conducting any enquiry against him pursuant to the proceedings dated 6th January 2011. The facts: 2. The Petitioner joined the service of the Agricultural Department as Agricultural Officer on 26th July 1972. He was appointed as Assistant Professor on 1st February 1989 in the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. He was later promoted as Professor. The Petitioner served as Technical Personal Assistant to the Minister for Agriculture, Government of Tamil Nadu....

Muthu Memorial Educational Trust Rep by Its Managing Trustee Vs. the G ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)CWC33

(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent relating to G.O.Ms.No.380, Higher Education B2 Department, dated 6.12.2010 and quash the same.) 1. The writ petition is filed challenging G.O.Ms.No.380, Higher Education (B2) Department, dated 6.12.2010 on a short issue that there has been gross violation of the principles of natural justice, arbitrariness and capriciousness in passing the impugned government order. It is also challenged on the ground that there is no application of mind and whatever has been stated in the government order is a verbatim reproduction of the statement made by the Commissioner of Technical Education, who has sent a proposal for cancellation of the No Objection Certificate. The Government has in turn not applied its mind, as to whether such recommendation of the Commissioner of Technical Education should be accepted or not. Without notice to the petitioner the i...

M/S. Shiva Polymers Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Kandamangal ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in G.D.No.75/2012-13 dated 16.11.2012 and quash the detention order as illegal and direct the respondent to release the goods detained in.) 1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in G.D.No.75/2012-13 dated 16.11.2012 and quash the detention order as illegal and direct the respondent to release the goods detained. 2. Mr.Aditya Reddy, learned Government Advocate (Tax) takes notice for the respondent. By consent the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. The writ petition is filed challenging the goods detention notice dated 6.11.2012 stating that it is contrary to the clarification issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai in Circular Acts Cell-IV/69980/2000 dated 23.11.2000. ...

Hindustan Corporation (Hyd) Private Ltd. Vs. M/S. Ssb Industries Limit ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)LW40; 2013(1)CTC279

(Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree of the Second Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai dated 20.07.2006 in A.S.No.704 of 2005 confirming the judgment and decree of the Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai dated 22.10.2003 in O.S.No.5378 of 1998.) The defendant in the original suit is the appellant. The original suit in O.S.No.5378 of 1998 was filed by the respondents 1 and 2 for the recovery of a sum of Rs.29,343/- as compensation for the damage caused to the goods transported in the appellant's/defendant's vehicle. The suit was decreed by the trial Court and the same was confirmed by the lower appellate Court. As against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below holding the appellant/defendant liable to pay the above said amount as damages with interest, the present second appeal has been filed. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to in accordance with their ranks in the original suit and if necessary, fu...