Chennai Court November 2012 Judgments

K. Kavitha Vs. Commissioner of Adi Dravidar Welfare and Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)MLJ119

(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.Ooa 1/10119/2012, dated 4.6.2012 and Na.Ka.Ooa 2/10119/2012, dated 4.7.2012 and quash the same and direct the respondents 1 to 3 to allow the petitioner to continue as Matron in Government Girls Hostel (ADW), Gingee, Villupuram District.) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner initially seeking for a direction to the respondents to allow her to continue as Matron in the Government Girls Hostel (ADW), Gingee, Villupuram District. 2. When the matter came up on 27.6.2012, this court while ordering notice to the official respondents to be taken by the learned Government Advocate, in respect of the 4th respondent, private notice was permitted. Thereafter, on 1.8.2012, once again private notice was permitted to the 4th respondent returnable by one we...

Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute Vs. the Union of India, ...

Court: Chennai

This Writ Petition has been filed, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records comprised in the proceedings of the first respondent dated 31.08.2010 in F.10-9/2007-U.3(A); quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the claims of the petitioner for issue of appropriate notification under Section 3 of the U.G.C.Act, by bringing the A.C.S.Medical College and Hospital under the ambit of Dr.M.G.R.Educational and Research Institute (Deemed University) with retrospective effect from the academic year 2008-2009 as positively recommended by the University Grants Commission as was done in the case of two other institutions namely Saveetha Medical College and Sathya Sai Medical College, which are similarly placed, so as to enable regularization of admissions made by the petitioner for the academic years 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 and also to enable the grant of renewal of permission for the academic year 2010-2011,...

P. Murugesan Vs. N.V. Kanniappan the Executive Officer and Another

Court: Chennai

(Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for not obeying the order dated 26.04.2011 made in W.P.No.7135 of 2011.) COMMON ORDER: These 12 contempt petitions were filed by 10 petitioners seeking to punish the respondents for having allegedly disobeyed a common order dated 26.04.2011 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.7135, 7314 to 7324 of 2011. Contempt Petition No.904 and 906 were filed by the same petitioner viz., V.Subramanian and Contempt Petition Nos.907 and 908 were filed by the same petitioner viz., S.Syed Jani. 2. These contempt petitions are classic example of the petitioners abusing the process of law. They have been filing series of writ petitions without any success. The number of petitions filed by them and the different orders obtained by them will clearly show their lack of bonafides and their exercise in filing innumerable petitions is a classic example of virtual raid on the Court. 3. When these contempt petitions came up on 2...

K. Vel Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Rep by Its Chairman, Corp ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of declaration declaring the decision of the third respondent Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner in his letter No.B9/TN/088/SRO-TRY/Exam.Estt./2012, dated 17.10.2012 directing the first respondent NLC management to hold an election consisting the members of the two recognized union to elect the representatives of employees to the NLC P.F. Board of Trust as illegal, null and void and contrary to Section 79-C(3) of the Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1952.) 1. The petitioner in this writ petition seeks for a declaration declaring that the decision of the third respondent Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub Regional Office, Trichy, dated 17.10.2012 directing the first respondent Neyveli Lignite Corporation (for short NLC) to hold an election consisting of the members of the two recognized unions for electing representatives of employees to the NLC P.F. Board o...

T. Vimala Rose Vs. the Director of School Education and Others

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the third respondent dated 4.7.2011 issued in his endorsement No. Ou.Mu.No.4030/2030/11, quash the same and consequently to direct the first respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for inclusion of his name in the appropriate place preferably over and above the 5th respondent in the regular panel of B.T. Assistant fit for promotion to the post of Head Masters of Government High Schools for the year 2011-2012 in the light of decision dated 6.10.2009 rendered in W.P.No.15689 of 2009 and consequently to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Head Master to Government High School from the date on which his immediate junior was promoted with all attendant service and monetary benefits. (Prayer amended as per order of the Court dated 2.7.2012 in M...

V.P. Radhakrishnan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Its Principal Secret ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)CWC368

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certioarified Mandamus calling for the records of the Respondents, particularly the 1st Respondent's impugned G.O.(D) No.455/HOME (CTS-VIA) Department, dated 4.6.12 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents to issue necessary orders to continue the petitioner's professional services under the Respondents as earlier.) 1. The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the order dated 4.6.2012 and direct the respondents to issue necessary orders to continue the petitioner's professional services under the respondents as earlier. 2. According to the petitioner, he is a practicing Advocate at Panruti having experience of more than 12 years. After considering the petitioner's bar experience and worthiness, the second respondent, with the consent of the first respondent, appointed him as Law Officer/Pleader for Government as Additional Public Prosecut...

Cuddalore District Saravanabhava Consumer Co-operative Whole Sale Stor ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Writ petitionfiled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent in his proceedings in miscellaneous petition No.44/2009 (Ka.No.2043/09/E2) dated 22.06.2010 quash the same. Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for having disobeyed the order in M.P.No.1 of 2010 in W.P.No.20630 of 2010 dated 07.09.2010.) Common Order 1. The petitioners in both writ petition and contempt petition is the Cooperative Society viz., Cuddalore District Saravanabhava Consumer Cooperative Wholesale Stores Limited, represented by its Special Officer, having office at 3, Beach Road, Cuddalore. 2. In the writ petition, the petitioner challenges an order of the Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Villupuram, dated 22.06.2010 and sought to set aside the said order. By the impugned order, the application filed by the second respondent Arulmigu Padaleswarar temple at...

Annai Indira Gandhi Aided Middle School Rep. by the Secretary D. Vasud ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Petition Nos. 21813 & 21814 of 2012 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Praying for a writ of Declaration declaring the impugned G.O. Ms. No. 4, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal program Department dated 06.01.2011 and consequent G.O. Ms. No. 72 dated 30.04.2012 issued by the respondent as Ultravires to the TNPSR Act 1973 and Aricle 14 of Constitution of India insofar as the petitioner are concerned and direct the respondent to select the Noon Meal Organisers, cooks and Noon Meal Assistants ( in respect of W.P. No. 22350/2012) and Noon Meal Organisers( in respect of W.P. No. 28294/2012), as per recommendation made by the individual school management as stipulated in G.O. Ms. No. 294, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme ( NMP-1 Department dated 21.10.1993.) Common Order: 1.These are the strange cases filed by the three managements of the private school running in Guidiyattam and Geerapalayam. In these two Writ Petitioners, the petitioners seek for a Declara...

N. Mathi Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvallur and Another

Court: Chennai

(This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings No.Rc.814/2009/A1 dated 11.02.2009 and quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all attendant benefits and other benefits.) This writ petition is filed by the petitioner, who was working as a Village Administrative Officer at Edamichi Village, Uthiramerur Taluk. In this writ petition, he had challenged an order of suspension dated 11.2.2009. The suspension order was made by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvallur, the first respondent herein. In the suspension order, it was stated that the petitioner had demanded and accepted a bribe of Rs.500/-. He was caught in a trap case laid by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption police and he was also arrested. Hence he was placed under ...

P. Pugalenthi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Chief Secretary to G ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer:-Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Declaration, declaring that the decision of the respondent - State of Tamil Nadu, dated 29.10.2012 to create "Tamil Nadu Youth Special Police Force" is null and void and directing the respondent -State of Tamil Nadu to fill in all the vacant posts of Grade II Constable by means of a special drive recruitment and to create adequate number of posts of Grade II Constable in Tamil Nadu.) 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the issuance of Writ of Declaration, declaring that the decision of the respondent - State of Tamil Nadu, dated 29.10.2012 to create "Tamil Nadu Youth Special Police Force" is null and void and directing the respondent to fill in all the vacant posts of Grade II Constable by means of a special drive recruitment and to create adequate number of posts of Grade II Constable in the State of Tamil Nadu. 2.On 29.10.2012, ...